From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull RDMA subsystem changes Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 13:33:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20180201203309.GO23352@mellanox.com> References: <20180131174735.GA18568@ziepe.ca> <20180131210457.GE23352@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Doug Ledford , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 11:12:43AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > For pure testing of temporary kernels that aren't actually in any way > upstream anyway, is there any reason why you can't just have a > separate kernel with the merges in place, but not make them part of > your development tree? Okay, thanks, I appreciate the clarity here. We can work something like this into our process, a temporary throw away branch is certainly easy enough to create. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html