From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [net-next] i40iw/i40e: Remove link dependency on i40e Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 23:20:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20180523062024.GB4753@infradead.org> References: <20180522203831.20624-1-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> <20180522205612.GD7502@mellanox.com> <079ceee3bc8cd0ea50dd7ddc12b27512ca5ac49e.camel@intel.com> <20180522213334.GE7502@mellanox.com> <2fcc22b088fd04dafbdc1582d03c4bca21eefade.camel@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fcc22b088fd04dafbdc1582d03c4bca21eefade.camel@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Kirsher Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , davem@davemloft.net, dledford@redhat.com, Sindhu Devale , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com, jogreene@redhat.com, Shiraz Saleem List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 02:50:32PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > The ABI rarely changes, if at all. The issue OSV's are seeing is that > upgrading i40e, requires that i40iw be recompiled even though there > were no updates/changes to the ABI. So fscking what. If you upgrade one part of the kernel you have to rebuild anbything. If people try to get away without that that is their problem, an certainly not something in any way supported by Linux.