From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 rdma-next 3/4] RDMA/hns: Add reset process for RoCE in hip08 Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 08:55:53 -0600 Message-ID: <20180525145553.GA27342@ziepe.ca> References: <1527070590-94399-1-git-send-email-xavier.huwei@huawei.com> <1527070590-94399-4-git-send-email-xavier.huwei@huawei.com> <20180524213143.GE3948@ziepe.ca> <5B07A517.7030507@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5B07A517.7030507@huawei.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 01:54:31PM +0800, Wei Hu (Xavier) wrote: > > > On 2018/5/25 5:31, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >> static const struct hnae3_client_ops hns_roce_hw_v2_ops = { > >> .init_instance = hns_roce_hw_v2_init_instance, > >> .uninit_instance = hns_roce_hw_v2_uninit_instance, > >> + .reset_notify = hns_roce_hw_v2_reset_notify, > >> }; > >> > >> static struct hnae3_client hns_roce_hw_v2_client = { > >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c > >> index 1b79a38..ac51372 100644 > >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c > >> @@ -332,6 +332,9 @@ static struct ib_ucontext *hns_roce_alloc_ucontext(struct ib_device *ib_dev, > >> struct hns_roce_ib_alloc_ucontext_resp resp = {}; > >> struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev = to_hr_dev(ib_dev); > >> > >> + if (!hr_dev->active) > >> + return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); > > This still doesn't make sense, ib_unregister_device already makes sure > > that hns_roce_alloc_ucontext isn't running and won't be called before > > returning, don't need another flag to do that. > > > > Since this is the only place the active flag is tested it can just be deleted > > entirely. > Hi, Jason > > roce reset process: > 1. hr_dev->active = false; //make sure no any process call > ibv_open_device. > 2. call ib_dispatch_event() function to report IB_EVENT_DEVICE_FATAL > event. > 3. msleep(100); // for some app to free resources > 4. call ib_unregister_device(). > 5. ... > 6. ... > > There are 2 steps as above before calling ib_unregister_device(), we > evaluate > hr_dev->active with false to avoid no any process call > ibv_open_device. If you think this is the right flow then it is core issue to block new opens, not an individual driver issue, send a core patch - eg add a 'ib_driver_fatal_error()' call that does the dispatch and call it from all the drivers using this IB_EVENT_DEVICE_FATAL I'm not completely sure this makes sense though, it might be better for the core code to force stuff a IB_EVENT_DEVICE_FATAL to contexts that open after the fatal event.. Jason