From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5497FC32751 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:13:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1647A214C6 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:13:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565111631; bh=GcwPgkJicx4YCfVs1IPwu6WwyqpK78qeXeT/YMfDkko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=kmfDf4uZRm00rQdLYXWF+LhE/U5EhQ/Gg6QX6uQgkMhR1NhKuU+XrILTLuFO5o1dW lqloNNVRwKbd3qkmoQEZ5YIl3qnPAj0QenPlngYVT5GManKThbubghBgR7NyqHsPQc xSDVW6BH1KoVB9EB+U9DN88wP//nEHhT8VU5/rJw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733115AbfHFRNr (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:13:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42228 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728189AbfHFRNq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:13:46 -0400 Received: from willie-the-truck (236.31.169.217.in-addr.arpa [217.169.31.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7ACF82086D; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:13:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1565111625; bh=GcwPgkJicx4YCfVs1IPwu6WwyqpK78qeXeT/YMfDkko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rTAT9bH7GKNJUZdS8BRtbH8phw4qgZ5+dRNFkldjVWk6dGxX0O1d/RnE/0V20gryu PTJMl31RRRdUsoRUBPiBr87DgRaB/HWSPKLtCibTJQQUtSYBOvQ2oBVDM1HUaAlT2q mkbOtB7+YYYk5DiFCNquMbqioXWuU2alu3yKrGRo= Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:13:36 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Will Deacon Cc: Andrey Konovalov , Vincenzo Frascino , Andrew Morton , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Szabolcs Nagy , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Kostya Serebryany , Khalid Aziz , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Felix Kuehling , Jacob Bramley , Leon Romanovsky , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jason Gunthorpe , Linux ARM , Dave Martin , Evgeniy Stepanov , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Brodsky , Kees Cook , Ruben Ayrapetyan , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Alex Williamson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dmitry Vyukov , Linux Memory Management List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Yishai Hadas , LKML , Jens Wiklander , Lee Smith , Alexander Deucher , enh , Robin Murphy , Christian Koenig , Luc Van Oostenryck Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 00/15] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel Message-ID: <20190806171335.4dzjex5asoertaob@willie-the-truck> References: <20190724140212.qzvbcx5j2gi5lcoj@willie-the-truck> <20190724142059.GC21234@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190724142059.GC21234@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:02 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:03:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > > > > Should this go through the mm or the arm tree? > > > > > > I would certainly prefer to take at least the arm64 bits via the arm64 tree > > > (i.e. patches 1, 2 and 15). We also need a Documentation patch describing > > > the new ABI. > > > > Sounds good! Should I post those patches together with the > > Documentation patches from Vincenzo as a separate patchset? > > Yes, please (although as you say below, we need a new version of those > patches from Vincenzo to address the feedback on v5). The other thing I > should say is that I'd be happy to queue the other patches in the series > too, but some of them are missing acks from the relevant maintainers (e.g. > the mm/ and fs/ changes). Ok, I've queued patches 1, 2, and 15 on a stable branch here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/tbi which should find its way into -next shortly via our for-next/core branch. If you want to make changes, please send additional patches on top. This is targetting 5.4, but I will drop it before the merge window if we don't have both of the following in place: * Updated ABI documentation with Acks from Catalin and Kevin * The other patches in the series either Acked (so I can pick them up) or queued via some other tree(s) for 5.4. Make sense? Cheers, Will