* [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path
@ 2019-09-06 11:18 Bernard Metzler
2019-09-06 22:31 ` Steve Wise
2019-09-09 12:25 ` Bernard Metzler
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Metzler @ 2019-09-06 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rdma; +Cc: dledford, Bernard Metzler
Since the transmit path is never executed in an atomic
context, we do not need kmap_atomic() and can always
use less demanding kmap().
Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
index 8e72f955921d..5d97bba0ce6d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
@@ -76,16 +76,15 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx *c_tx, void *paddr)
if (unlikely(!p))
return -EFAULT;
- buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
+ buffer = kmap(p);
if (likely(PAGE_SIZE - off >= bytes)) {
memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, bytes);
- kunmap_atomic(buffer);
} else {
unsigned long part = bytes - (PAGE_SIZE - off);
memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, part);
- kunmap_atomic(buffer);
+ kunmap(p);
if (!mem->is_pbl)
p = siw_get_upage(mem->umem,
@@ -97,11 +96,10 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx *c_tx, void *paddr)
if (unlikely(!p))
return -EFAULT;
- buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
- memcpy(paddr + part, buffer,
- bytes - part);
- kunmap_atomic(buffer);
+ buffer = kmap(p);
+ memcpy(paddr + part, buffer, bytes - part);
}
+ kunmap(p);
}
}
return (int)bytes;
--
2.17.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path
2019-09-06 11:18 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path Bernard Metzler
@ 2019-09-06 22:31 ` Steve Wise
2019-09-09 12:25 ` Bernard Metzler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steve Wise @ 2019-09-06 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bernard Metzler; +Cc: linux-rdma, dledford
Hey Bernard, is the code below called directly from the driver’s post_send function? If so it must use atomic...I think.
Stevo
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 6:18 AM, Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Since the transmit path is never executed in an atomic
> context, we do not need kmap_atomic() and can always
> use less demanding kmap().
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> index 8e72f955921d..5d97bba0ce6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
> @@ -76,16 +76,15 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx *c_tx, void *paddr)
> if (unlikely(!p))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
> + buffer = kmap(p);
>
> if (likely(PAGE_SIZE - off >= bytes)) {
> memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, bytes);
> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
> } else {
> unsigned long part = bytes - (PAGE_SIZE - off);
>
> memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, part);
> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
> + kunmap(p);
>
> if (!mem->is_pbl)
> p = siw_get_upage(mem->umem,
> @@ -97,11 +96,10 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx *c_tx, void *paddr)
> if (unlikely(!p))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
> - memcpy(paddr + part, buffer,
> - bytes - part);
> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
> + buffer = kmap(p);
> + memcpy(paddr + part, buffer, bytes - part);
> }
> + kunmap(p);
> }
> }
> return (int)bytes;
> --
> 2.17.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path
2019-09-06 11:18 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path Bernard Metzler
2019-09-06 22:31 ` Steve Wise
@ 2019-09-09 12:25 ` Bernard Metzler
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernard Metzler @ 2019-09-09 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve Wise; +Cc: linux-rdma, dledford
-----"Steve Wise" <larrystevenwise@gmail.com> wrote: -----
>To: "Bernard Metzler" <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
>From: "Steve Wise" <larrystevenwise@gmail.com>
>Date: 09/07/2019 12:31AM
>Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic()
>use in TX path
>
>Hey Bernard, is the code below called directly from the driver’s
>post_send function? If so it must use atomic...I think.
>
Hey Steve,
Only a kernel TX thread executes the TX path. It is not
executed directly from the drivers post_send() method,
which only queues work for TX processing and wakes up
the TX thread if it currently does not run.
The single exception is TX processing
out of a user space application context, if no TX
thread is currently running, but only for a small
burst. In any case, all TX processing is done out of
a non-atomic context.
Best,
Bernard.
>Stevo
>
>> On Sep 6, 2019, at 6:18 AM, Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
>wrote:
>>
>> Since the transmit path is never executed in an atomic
>> context, we do not need kmap_atomic() and can always
>> use less demanding kmap().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 12 +++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>> index 8e72f955921d..5d97bba0ce6d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c
>> @@ -76,16 +76,15 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx
>*c_tx, void *paddr)
>> if (unlikely(!p))
>> return -EFAULT;
>>
>> - buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
>> + buffer = kmap(p);
>>
>> if (likely(PAGE_SIZE - off >= bytes)) {
>> memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, bytes);
>> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
>> } else {
>> unsigned long part = bytes - (PAGE_SIZE - off);
>>
>> memcpy(paddr, buffer + off, part);
>> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
>> + kunmap(p);
>>
>> if (!mem->is_pbl)
>> p = siw_get_upage(mem->umem,
>> @@ -97,11 +96,10 @@ static int siw_try_1seg(struct siw_iwarp_tx
>*c_tx, void *paddr)
>> if (unlikely(!p))
>> return -EFAULT;
>>
>> - buffer = kmap_atomic(p);
>> - memcpy(paddr + part, buffer,
>> - bytes - part);
>> - kunmap_atomic(buffer);
>> + buffer = kmap(p);
>> + memcpy(paddr + part, buffer, bytes - part);
>> }
>> + kunmap(p);
>> }
>> }
>> return (int)bytes;
>> --
>> 2.17.2
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-09 12:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-06 11:18 [PATCH] RDMA/siw: Relax from kmap_atomic() use in TX path Bernard Metzler
2019-09-06 22:31 ` Steve Wise
2019-09-09 12:25 ` Bernard Metzler
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).