From: Krishnamraju Eraparaju <krishna2@chelsio.com>
To: Bernard Metzler <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: "jgg@ziepe.ca" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>,
Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/siw: fix SQ/RQ drain logic to support ib_drain_qp
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 15:22:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191001095224.GA5448@chelsio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFFA5BB431.AD96EB3F-ON00258485.0054053B-00258485.0055D206@notes.na.collabserv.com>
On Monday, September 09/30/19, 2019 at 21:07:23 +0530, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> -----"Krishnamraju Eraparaju" <krishna2@chelsio.com> wrote: -----
>
> >To: jgg@ziepe.ca, bmt@zurich.ibm.com
> >From: "Krishnamraju Eraparaju" <krishna2@chelsio.com>
> >Date: 09/28/2019 12:16AM
> >Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bharat@chelsio.com,
> >nirranjan@chelsio.com, "Krishnamraju Eraparaju"
> ><krishna2@chelsio.com>
> >Subject: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH for-next] RDMA/siw: fix SQ/RQ drain logic
> >to support ib_drain_qp
> >
> >The storage ULPs(iSER & NVMeOF) uses ib_drain_qp() to drain
> >QP/CQ properly. But SIW is currently using it's own routines to
> >drain SQ & RQ, which can't help ULPs to determine the last CQE.
> >Failing to wait until last CQE causes touch after free issues:
>
> Hi Krishna,
>
> Before reviewing, please let me fully understand what is
> going on here/why we need that patch.
>
> Is this issue caused since the ulp expects the ib_drain_xx
> driver method to be blocking until all completions are reaped,
> and siw does not block?
Yes, SIW is currently using provider-specific drain_qp logic,
IE: siw_verbs_rq/sq_flush(), with this logic though all the SQ & RQ
entries are flushed to CQ but ULPs cannot ensure when exactly the
processing of all CQEs for those WRs, posted prior to ib_drain_xx(),
got completed.
Due to this uncertainity, sometimes iSER/NVMeOF driver(assuming all
the CQEs are processed) proceed to release resouces/destroy_qp,
causing touch after free issues.
>
> Is the ULP expected to call ib_drain_xx only if no other
> work is pending (SQ/RQ/CQ)? If not, shall all previous
> work be completed with FLUSH error?
In error cases(eg: link-down), I see iSER/NVMEOF drivers performing
disconnect/drain_qp though there is some pending work to be processed.
This may be valid due to the ERROR.
And all that pending work gets completed with FLUSH error.
>
> Many thanks!
> Bernard.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >[ +0.001831] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> >[ +0.000002] Call Trace:
> >[ +0.000026] ? __ib_process_cq+0x7a/0xc0 [ib_core]
> >[ +0.000008] ? ib_poll_handler+0x2c/0x80 [ib_core]
> >[ +0.000005] ? irq_poll_softirq+0xae/0x110
> >[ +0.000005] ? __do_softirq+0xda/0x2a8
> >[ +0.000004] ? run_ksoftirqd+0x26/0x40
> >[ +0.000005] ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x10e/0x160
> >[ +0.000004] ? kthread+0xf8/0x130
> >[ +0.000003] ? sort_range+0x20/0x20
> >[ +0.000003] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
> >[ +0.000003] ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> >
> >Hence, changing the SQ & RQ drain logic to support current IB/core
> >drain semantics, though this drain method does not naturally aligns
> >to iWARP spec(where post_send/recv calls are not allowed in
> >QP ERROR state). More on this was described in below commit:
> >commit 4fe7c2962e11 ("iw_cxgb4: refactor sq/rq drain logic")
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Krishnamraju Eraparaju <krishna2@chelsio.com>
> >---
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h | 3 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c | 4 +-
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c | 20 ---------
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 60
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> >b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> >index dba4535494ab..ad4f078e4587 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> >@@ -240,7 +240,8 @@ enum siw_qp_flags {
> > SIW_RDMA_READ_ENABLED = (1 << 2),
> > SIW_SIGNAL_ALL_WR = (1 << 3),
> > SIW_MPA_CRC = (1 << 4),
> >- SIW_QP_IN_DESTROY = (1 << 5)
> >+ SIW_QP_IN_DESTROY = (1 << 5),
> >+ SIW_QP_DRAINED_FINAL = (1 << 6)
> > };
> >
> > enum siw_qp_attr_mask {
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> >b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> >index 8c1931a57f4a..fb830622d32e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> >@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int siw_proc_mpareply(struct siw_cep *cep)
> > memset(&qp_attrs, 0, sizeof(qp_attrs));
> >
> > if (rep->params.bits & MPA_RR_FLAG_CRC)
> >- qp_attrs.flags = SIW_MPA_CRC;
> >+ qp_attrs.flags |= SIW_MPA_CRC;
> >
> > qp_attrs.irq_size = cep->ird;
> > qp_attrs.orq_size = cep->ord;
> >@@ -1675,7 +1675,7 @@ int siw_accept(struct iw_cm_id *id, struct
> >iw_cm_conn_param *params)
> > qp_attrs.irq_size = cep->ird;
> > qp_attrs.sk = cep->sock;
> > if (cep->mpa.hdr.params.bits & MPA_RR_FLAG_CRC)
> >- qp_attrs.flags = SIW_MPA_CRC;
> >+ qp_attrs.flags |= SIW_MPA_CRC;
> > qp_attrs.state = SIW_QP_STATE_RTS;
> >
> > siw_dbg_cep(cep, "[QP%u]: moving to rts\n", qp_id(qp));
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> >b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> >index 05a92f997f60..fb01407a310f 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c
> >@@ -248,24 +248,6 @@ static struct ib_qp *siw_get_base_qp(struct
> >ib_device *base_dev, int id)
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> >-static void siw_verbs_sq_flush(struct ib_qp *base_qp)
> >-{
> >- struct siw_qp *qp = to_siw_qp(base_qp);
> >-
> >- down_write(&qp->state_lock);
> >- siw_sq_flush(qp);
> >- up_write(&qp->state_lock);
> >-}
> >-
> >-static void siw_verbs_rq_flush(struct ib_qp *base_qp)
> >-{
> >- struct siw_qp *qp = to_siw_qp(base_qp);
> >-
> >- down_write(&qp->state_lock);
> >- siw_rq_flush(qp);
> >- up_write(&qp->state_lock);
> >-}
> >-
> > static const struct ib_device_ops siw_device_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > .uverbs_abi_ver = SIW_ABI_VERSION,
> >@@ -284,8 +266,6 @@ static const struct ib_device_ops siw_device_ops
> >= {
> > .destroy_cq = siw_destroy_cq,
> > .destroy_qp = siw_destroy_qp,
> > .destroy_srq = siw_destroy_srq,
> >- .drain_rq = siw_verbs_rq_flush,
> >- .drain_sq = siw_verbs_sq_flush,
> > .get_dma_mr = siw_get_dma_mr,
> > .get_port_immutable = siw_get_port_immutable,
> > .iw_accept = siw_accept,
> >diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> >b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> >index 869e02b69a01..5dd62946a649 100644
> >--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> >+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c
> >@@ -596,6 +596,13 @@ int siw_verbs_modify_qp(struct ib_qp *base_qp,
> >struct ib_qp_attr *attr,
> >
> > rv = siw_qp_modify(qp, &new_attrs, siw_attr_mask);
> >
> >+ /* QP state ERROR here ensures that all the SQ & RQ entries got
> >drained
> >+ * completely. And henceforth, no more entries will be added to the
> >CQ,
> >+ * exception is special drain CQEs via ib_drain_qp().
> >+ */
> >+ if (qp->attrs.state == SIW_QP_STATE_ERROR)
> >+ qp->attrs.flags |= SIW_QP_DRAINED_FINAL;
> >+
> > up_write(&qp->state_lock);
> > out:
> > return rv;
> >@@ -687,6 +694,44 @@ static int siw_copy_inline_sgl(const struct
> >ib_send_wr *core_wr,
> > return bytes;
> > }
> >
> >+/* SQ final completion routine to support ib_drain_sp(). */
> >+int siw_sq_final_comp(struct siw_qp *qp, const struct ib_send_wr
> >*wr,
> >+ const struct ib_send_wr **bad_wr)
> >+{
> >+ struct siw_sqe sqe = {};
> >+ int rv = 0;
> >+
> >+ while (wr) {
> >+ sqe.id = wr->wr_id;
> >+ sqe.opcode = wr->opcode;
> >+ rv = siw_sqe_complete(qp, &sqe, 0, SIW_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR);
> >+ if (rv) {
> >+ *bad_wr = wr;
> >+ break;
> >+ }
> >+ wr = wr->next;
> >+ }
> >+ return rv;
> >+}
> >+
> >+/* RQ final completion routine to support ib_drain_rp(). */
> >+int siw_rq_final_comp(struct siw_qp *qp, const struct ib_recv_wr
> >*wr,
> >+ const struct ib_recv_wr **bad_wr)
> >+{
> >+ struct siw_rqe rqe = {};
> >+ int rv = 0;
> >+
> >+ while (wr) {
> >+ rqe.id = wr->wr_id;
> >+ rv = siw_rqe_complete(qp, &rqe, 0, 0, SIW_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR);
> >+ if (rv) {
> >+ *bad_wr = wr;
> >+ break;
> >+ }
> >+ wr = wr->next;
> >+ }
> >+ return rv;
> >+}
> > /*
> > * siw_post_send()
> > *
> >@@ -705,6 +750,15 @@ int siw_post_send(struct ib_qp *base_qp, const
> >struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int rv = 0;
> >
> >+ /* Currently there is no way to distinguish between special drain
> >+ * WRs and normal WRs(?), so we do FLUSH_ERR for all the WRs
> >that've
> >+ * arrived in the ERROR/SIW_QP_DRAINED_FINAL state, assuming we get
> >+ * only special drain WRs in this state via ib_drain_sq().
> >+ */
> >+ if (qp->attrs.flags & SIW_QP_DRAINED_FINAL) {
> >+ rv = siw_sq_final_comp(qp, wr, bad_wr);
> >+ return rv;
> >+ }
> > /*
> > * Try to acquire QP state lock. Must be non-blocking
> > * to accommodate kernel clients needs.
> >@@ -919,6 +973,12 @@ int siw_post_receive(struct ib_qp *base_qp,
> >const struct ib_recv_wr *wr,
> > *bad_wr = wr;
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP; /* what else from errno.h? */
> > }
> >+
> >+ if (qp->attrs.flags & SIW_QP_DRAINED_FINAL) {
> >+ rv = siw_rq_final_comp(qp, wr, bad_wr);
> >+ return rv;
> >+ }
> >+
> > /*
> > * Try to acquire QP state lock. Must be non-blocking
> > * to accommodate kernel clients needs.
> >--
> >2.23.0.rc0
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-27 22:15 [PATCH for-next] RDMA/siw: fix SQ/RQ drain logic to support ib_drain_qp Krishnamraju Eraparaju
2019-09-30 15:37 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-01 9:52 ` Krishnamraju Eraparaju [this message]
2019-10-01 15:56 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-01 17:45 ` Krishnamraju Eraparaju
2019-10-02 11:27 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-03 10:51 ` Krishnamraju Eraparaju
2019-10-03 14:03 ` Bernard Metzler
2019-10-04 4:57 ` Krishnamraju Eraparaju
2019-10-04 13:47 ` Bernard Metzler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191001095224.GA5448@chelsio.com \
--to=krishna2@chelsio.com \
--cc=BMT@zurich.ibm.com \
--cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).