From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Ralph Campbell" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Felix.Kuehling@amd.com" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Zhou" <David1.Zhou@amd.com>,
"Dennis Dalessandro" <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Mike Marciniszyn" <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>,
"Oleksandr Andrushchenko" <oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com>,
"Petr Cvek" <petrcvekcz@gmail.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"Philip Yang" <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 16:46:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191113164620.GG21728@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113135952.GB20531@infradead.org>
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 05:59:52AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +int mmu_interval_notifier_insert(struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
> > + struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned long length,
> > + const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops *ops);
> > +int mmu_interval_notifier_insert_locked(
> > + struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + unsigned long start, unsigned long length,
> > + const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops *ops);
>
> Very inconsistent indentation between these two related functions.
clang-format.. The kernel config is set to prefer a line up under the
( if all the arguments will fit within the 80 cols otherwise it does a
1 tab continuation indent.
> > + /*
> > + * The inv_end incorporates a deferred mechanism like
> > + * rtnl_unlock(). Adds and removes are queued until the final inv_end
> > + * happens then they are progressed. This arrangement for tree updates
> > + * is used to avoid using a blocking lock during
> > + * invalidate_range_start.
>
> Nitpick: That comment can be condensed into one less line:
The rtnl_unlock can move up a line too. My editor is failing me on
this.
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: Since we already have a spinlock above, this would be faster
> > + * as wake_up_q
> > + */
> > + if (need_wake)
> > + wake_up_all(&mmn_mm->wq);
>
> So why is this important enough for a TODO comment, but not important
> enough to do right away?
Lets drop the comment, I'm noto sure wake_up_q is even a function this
layer should be calling.
> > + * release semantics on the initialization of the mmu_notifier_mm's
> > + * contents are provided for unlocked readers. acquire can only be
> > + * used while holding the mmgrab or mmget, and is safe because once
> > + * created the mmu_notififer_mm is not freed until the mm is
> > + * destroyed. As above, users holding the mmap_sem or one of the
> > + * mm_take_all_locks() do not need to use acquire semantics.
> > */
>
> Some spaces instead of tabs here.
Got it
> > +static int __mmu_interval_notifier_insert(
> > + struct mmu_interval_notifier *mni, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + struct mmu_notifier_mm *mmn_mm, unsigned long start,
> > + unsigned long length, const struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops *ops)
>
> Odd indentation - we usuall do two tabs (my preference) or align after
> the opening brace.
This is one tab. I don't think one tab is odd, it seems pretty popular
even just in mm/.
But two tabs is considered usual? I didn't even know that.
> > + * This function must be paired with mmu_interval_notifier_insert(). It cannot be
>
> line > 80 chars.
got it, was missed during the rename
> Otherwise this looks good and very similar to what I reviewed earlier:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks a bunch, your comments have been very helpful on this series!
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-13 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 20:22 [PATCH hmm v3 00/14] Consolidate the mmu notifier interval_tree and locking Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] mm/mmu_notifier: define the header pre-processor parts even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-13 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-13 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 16:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-11-23 0:54 ` Ralph Campbell
2019-11-23 23:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] mm/hmm: allow hmm_range to be used with a mmu_interval_notifier or hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-13 14:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] mm/hmm: define the pre-processor related parts of hmm.h even if disabled Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-13 14:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] RDMA/odp: Use mmu_interval_notifier_insert() Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] RDMA/hfi1: Use mmu_interval_notifier_insert for user_exp_rcv Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] drm/radeon: use mmu_interval_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] nouveau: use mmu_notifier directly for invalidate_range_start Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] nouveau: use mmu_interval_notifier instead of hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] drm/amdgpu: Call find_vma under mmap_sem Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_interval_insert instead of hmm_mirror Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] drm/amdgpu: Use mmu_interval_notifier " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-19 19:59 ` Philip Yang
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] mm/hmm: remove hmm_mirror and related Jason Gunthorpe
2019-11-13 14:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-12 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] xen/gntdev: use mmu_interval_notifier_insert Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191113164620.GG21728@mellanox.com \
--to=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=David1.Zhou@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.marciniszyn@intel.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com \
--cc=petrcvekcz@gmail.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).