From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D59C43603 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D908B222C2 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="Wje4NA+I" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727360AbfLTNrs (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:47:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:41727 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727344AbfLTNrs (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:47:48 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id k40so8218155qtk.8 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:47:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q6GyF0QcTOJsUW+37VpjrWotJWCHXQwH4nGmsUY28S4=; b=Wje4NA+I0loo/ADCzzVPBusWP6DiLDcm24fqVi7+SZWZxgJkPWTyUFH/THRV+BwIMA yFB2PM8ADuRyAwSJJAkz548QVSmWb1A+uXSiXd/Kr60GHFK1gf3u+xHnEnOG7zpa6n8a 1ydZM4pp9eC0l1fgoxLzC/nQ9BQ4Beq/loOsafYGyjPaH859DkpJ3g7brjndqXJTLRAz XiiOpLFixIt9BowfCwSkrmHefdoHh6CTFKhn2V3FD93uTa9BWMZ5h0IIQY2NR2ee77ER f/zqEEuMiE2c0o//jJ5r3EFwVQRmFo3vMc4BlcXZkA1+BYUN9YnRqeWk44ooLCUnBiCB EL7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Q6GyF0QcTOJsUW+37VpjrWotJWCHXQwH4nGmsUY28S4=; b=l1G7AmPK0dfa7OHBKoZbR1WPbIPjEKFrdseje3jq1Tkuj8S78t4RAbQ/yEDfUP5Z1R eRdSbmHD0ywnzTlTWchoE2eG0W5xRnXJ90ie+NHt/VQN6HYstbFMWZvfTB9vUIxvqObd 15e+9NMF9E0o7o29z21Z9yML3Qc5q7FhwGQhV1a1mcFJ9h6x9cuPICPcTgxcMbhkKxqL X7NTpw+zMY/pBoGnrBFvfxmmdI8T7RGKSDuR8w7pzt1mHrHoSUw2VioOBAFdxA5BEkLJ MwPsIMYp7GdcZ6Ty85AIpeHWdVtKwoPLZmfWn5wX6YmMuREr+avuWiHTKrAqItvjb5V/ Pr9g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDUKel9Boa1xR4fguNGfizFCuyf+/yWzXWTGFGyuXM2tViTg1p YLLLrxuFyKgW3tD7EJNedurPlA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUC07HcIR+VcneRTOyaRRo1PO6O4VpNIi81m9oCayPyW3zc+6n6LlCNGqlTrPo6/IS5cTyMQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5442:: with SMTP id d2mr12101119qtq.297.1576849667421; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:47:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-68-57-212.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.68.57.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t73sm2881828qke.71.2019.12.20.05.47.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 05:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iiId8-00040V-7H; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:47:46 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:47:46 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc 0/4] Patches for 5.5 rc Message-ID: <20191220134746.GD13506@ziepe.ca> References: <20191219211609.58387.86077.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191219211609.58387.86077.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > The first two patches I wouldn't ordinarily have sent for -rc but I noticed we > did this in the previous -rc post, add an API because we use it in the next fix. > That's what the first two patches here do. It's understandable if you are > skeptical that those are OK for -rc and in which case you can drop and we can > send for next. The only one that looks RC worthy to me is: > Kaike Wan (1): > IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item > > Mike Marciniszyn (2): > IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members > IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header How is correcting comments a needed fix? Jason