From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714B9C2D0C2 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048421835 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="WUTQZDd0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728373AbgACUrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:47:11 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com ([209.85.219.65]:35899 "EHLO mail-qv1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727848AbgACUrL (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:47:11 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id m14so796221qvl.3 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 12:47:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HWSgfSNckyAPcKwlqkqymBcotOO8BjxRLt7B5UyU6qI=; b=WUTQZDd0eg+P2NQ9vupdbwGad7KeEdwooyufB+PSJjEHnyflRGaunTcRKM7+nNZ4Fh 6zHjOQbS6aVAuCnyMUXOpVXupFqgtGRSs1hbaeoyWG3zlgdjE5gmSMjAvVSVJwHnfltc LvzFFp+BouK4qT4nZcWZQjKLdJsegEb7kQ+NDfgF7YJDOqbCPPGP26ZvNn8V/HuwhmN8 WcIAsThx5VSdGxcF0bKdv6PAU9KSzTgT3KjJheN/FhniD1tvoQvPUUdZp7wYM/bziKFN Ttjd+wrdCJa/ZiEFaI6cc8eHOKb5YE/IC2/yZuNEzJU10pQLjZj6kTZQ26N3me1A3x3r iPkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HWSgfSNckyAPcKwlqkqymBcotOO8BjxRLt7B5UyU6qI=; b=FyPlBI2BjAR3ozOfhcrJABRlmJ9VNYineAuA1KAiOw2hrLK/CoclIINhJseHieV3/W nxNUFx7Vf9VLuN7gzSI10PYIXDn05rS+5HM7jTSKqGvi2ocwPntsPEazLqaJAHYndGep B0ctUSy3rVk1/oGSHso536ka1e5vnCvK+P1N5cAc9T63bS262VVMIPknwGdNhWxNz+jA NUf7sIl9wFcO3OKR0AotViqbibHJD/JfJVlYWazd5D3BXmxFCoEj6kam2YUVApRz9Jq6 2pKmKLBdgy0AGZi2FNueYAfdY7LmCTMQRoDPE4g1nuO4TbMhr6dsOZ9JQ92dSBkHzRY7 Prhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKx+g0xc+2lKQ6rStph2R1LmSETFyVw55I+8ykZHnjoBDLQAgK WBU1F+J6/WXRhBwSIzeVBfDbig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz41nkq9lyt4ariwh1rlwK9va08w8y1fceIe/Vdut5EoDdiyk5BDoepM0s6g6WaDot83UH+pg== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:acc6:: with SMTP id n6mr70193159qvc.26.1578084430515; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 12:47:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-68-57-212.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.68.57.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24sm17187506qka.32.2020.01.03.12.47.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Jan 2020 12:47:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1inTqf-0002z0-Gc; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 16:47:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:47:09 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc 0/4] Patches for 5.5 rc Message-ID: <20200103204709.GA11402@ziepe.ca> References: <20191219211609.58387.86077.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191219211609.58387.86077.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > The first two patches I wouldn't ordinarily have sent for -rc but I noticed we > did this in the previous -rc post, add an API because we use it in the next fix. > That's what the first two patches here do. It's understandable if you are > skeptical that those are OK for -rc and in which case you can drop and we can > send for next. > > > Kaike Wan (1): > IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item As I said before, I took this one to -rc > Michael J. Ruhl (1): > IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs This version of the patch now applies cleanly, so please disregard my earlier email > Mike Marciniszyn (2): > IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members > IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header These three are applied to -next Thanks, Jason