From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/4] Let IB core distribute cache update events
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:28:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200108002814.GA1937@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212113024.336702-1-leon@kernel.org>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 01:30:20PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> Parav Pandit (4):
> IB/mlx5: Do reverse sequence during device removal
> IB/core: Let IB core distribute cache update events
> IB/core: Cut down single member ib_cache structure
> IB/core: Prefix qp to event_handler_lock
I used qp_open_list_lock in the last patch, and I'm still interested
if/why globally serializing the qp handlers is required, or if that
could be rw spinlock too.
Otherwise applied to for-next
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-08 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-12 11:30 [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/4] Let IB core distribute cache update events Leon Romanovsky
2019-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 1/4] IB/mlx5: Do reverse sequence during device removal Leon Romanovsky
2019-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/4] IB/core: Let IB core distribute cache update events Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-07 21:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-01-08 11:35 ` Parav Pandit
2019-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 3/4] IB/core: Cut down single member ib_cache structure Leon Romanovsky
2019-12-12 11:30 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 4/4] IB/core: Prefix qp to event_handler_lock Leon Romanovsky
2020-01-08 0:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-01-08 11:42 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/4] Let IB core distribute cache update events Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200108002814.GA1937@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).