linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>,
	target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/7] Add Enhanced Connection Established (ECE)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:36:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420133607.GD121146@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200413141538.935574-1-leon@kernel.org>

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 05:15:31PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
>
> Changelog:
>  v2:
>  * Rebased on latest rdma-next and removed already accepted patches.
>  * Updated all rdma_reject in-kernel users to provide reject reason.
>  v1: Dropped field_avail patch in favor of mass conversion to use function
>      which already exists in the kernel code.
>  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200310091438.248429-1-leon@kernel.org
>  v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200305150105.207959-1-leon@kernel.org
>
> Enhanced Connection Established or ECE is new negotiation scheme
> introduced in IBTA v1.4 to exchange extra information about nodes
> capabilities and later negotiate them at the connection establishment
> phase.
>
> The RDMA-CM messages (REQ, REP, SIDR_REQ and SIDR_REP) were extended
> to carry two fields, one new and another gained new functionality:
>  * VendorID is a new field that indicates that common subset of vendor
>    option bits are supported as indicated by that VendorID.
>  * AttributeModifier already exists, but overloaded to indicate which
>    vendor options are supported by this VendorID.
>
> This is kernel part of such functionality which is responsible to get data
> from librdmacm and properly create and handle RDMA-CM messages.
>
> Thanks
>
> Leon Romanovsky (7):
>   RDMA/cm: Add Enhanced Connection Establishment (ECE) bits
>   RDMA/uapi: Add ECE definitions to UCMA
>   RDMA/ucma: Extend ucma_connect to receive ECE parameters
>   RDMA/ucma: Deliver ECE parameters through UCMA events
>   RDMA/cm: Send and receive ECE parameter over the wire
>   RDMA/cma: Connect ECE to rdma_accept
>   RDMA/cma: Provide ECE reject reason

PR: https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/745

Thanks

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-13 14:15 [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/7] Add Enhanced Connection Established (ECE) Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 1/7] RDMA/cm: Add Enhanced Connection Establishment (ECE) bits Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 2/7] RDMA/uapi: Add ECE definitions to UCMA Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 3/7] RDMA/ucma: Extend ucma_connect to receive ECE parameters Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 17:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 17:47     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 18:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 18:23         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 4/7] RDMA/ucma: Deliver ECE parameters through UCMA events Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 5/7] RDMA/cm: Send and receive ECE parameter over the wire Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 17:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 18:02     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 6/7] RDMA/cma: Connect ECE to rdma_accept Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-13 14:15 ` [PATCH rdma-next v2 7/7] RDMA/cma: Provide ECE reject reason Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 18:14   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 18:22     ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-05-25 18:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-26  5:49         ` Leon Romanovsky
2020-04-20 13:36 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420133607.GD121146@unreal \
    --to=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).