linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Dakshaja Uppalapati <dakshaja@chelsio.com>,
	dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	bharat@chelsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-rc] iw_cxgb4: Fix refcount underflow while destroying cqs.
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:06:07 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722120607.GE1117491@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YPkhhDkvYY2JVM+6@unreal>

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:43:00AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:51:55PM +0530, Dakshaja Uppalapati wrote:
> > Previous atomic increment decrement logic expects the atomic count
> > to be '0' after the final decrement. Replacing atomic count with
> > refcount does not allow that as refcount_dec() considers count of 1 as
> > underflow. Therefore fix the current refcount logic by decrementing
> > the refcount if one on the final deref in c4iw_destroy_cq().
> > 
> > Fixes: 7183451f846d (RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for reference counting")
> > Signed-off-by: Dakshaja Uppalapati <dakshaja@chelsio.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@chelsio.com>
> >  drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cq.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> 
> We have plenty of such errors, worth to check them:
> ➜  kernel git:(rdma-next) git grep refcount_read drivers/infiniband/ | grep -v WARN_ON
> drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:	if (!refcount_read(&ib_dev->refcount))
> drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:	if (refcount_read(&device->refcount) == 0 ||
> drivers/infiniband/core/iwpm_util.c:	if (!refcount_read(&iwpm_admin.refcount)) {
> drivers/infiniband/core/iwpm_util.c:	if (!refcount_read(&iwpm_admin.refcount)) {
> drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c:	if (refcount_read(&ctx->ref))
> drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cq.c:	wait_event(chp->wait, !refcount_read(&chp->refcnt));
> drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/utils.c:			   refcount_read(&cqp_request->refcnt) == 1, 1000);
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h:	wait_event(mmkey->wait, refcount_read(&mmkey->usecount) == 0);
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c:	    refcount_read(&mr->mmkey.usecount) != 0 &&

It isn't the read that is the problem, it is the naked dec.

This common pattern is just being done in an obtuse and arguably wrong
way

It is supposed to look like this:

void ib_device_put(struct ib_device *device)
{
        if (refcount_dec_and_test(&device->refcount))
                complete(&device->unreg_completion);
}

[..]

        ib_device_put(device);
        wait_for_completion(&device->unreg_completion);


Not use refcount_read() and a naked work queue

So I'd say these ones should be looked at:

drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb4/cq.c:       refcount_dec(&chp->refcnt);
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_db.c:        refcount_dec(&db->u.user_page->refcount);
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c:       refcount_dec(&cm_node->refcnt);
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c:               refcount_dec(&listener->refcnt);
drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/cm.c:                       refcount_dec(&listener->refcnt);

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 12:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21 11:21 [PATCH for-rc] iw_cxgb4: Fix refcount underflow while destroying cqs Dakshaja Uppalapati
2021-07-22  7:43 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-22 12:06   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-07-22 12:57     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-22 13:02       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-22 13:23         ` Dakshaja Uppalapati
2021-07-22 14:01         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-07-22 14:02           ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]             ` <20210803155919.GB11439@chelsio.com>
2021-08-03 16:09               ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210722120607.GE1117491@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bharat@chelsio.com \
    --cc=dakshaja@chelsio.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).