[PATCH net-next v4 0/3] check return value of rhashtable_init in mlx5e, ipv6, mac80211

[PATCH net-next v4 0/3] check return value of rhashtable_init in mlx5e, ipv6, mac80211

[MichelleJin]

When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.
The three patches are essentially the same logic.

v1->v2:
 - change commit message
 - fix possible memory leaks
v2->v3:
 - split patch into mlx5e, ipv6, mac80211
v3->v4:
 - fix newly created warnings due to patches in net/ipv6/seg6.c


MichelleJin (3):
  net/mlx5e: check return value of rhashtable_init
  net: ipv6: check return value of rhashtable_init
  net: mac80211: check return value of rhashtable_init

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c                            |  6 +++++-
 net/ipv6/seg6.c                                    |  8 ++++++--
 net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c                               |  4 +---
 net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c                        |  5 ++++-
 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/mlx5e: check return value of rhashtable_init

[MichelleJin]

When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.

Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
---

v1->v2:
 - change commit message
 - fix unneeded destroying of ht
v2->v3:
 - nothing changed
v3->v4:
 - nothing changed

 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
index 6c949abcd2e1..225748a9e52a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
@@ -2127,12 +2127,20 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_fs_chains *chains,
 
 	ct_priv->post_act = post_act;
 	mutex_init(&ct_priv->control_lock);
-	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params);
-	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params);
-	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params);
+	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params))
+		goto err_ct_zone_ht;
+	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params))
+		goto err_ct_tuples_ht;
+	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params))
+		goto err_ct_tuples_nat_ht;
 
 	return ct_priv;
 
+err_ct_tuples_nat_ht:
+	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht);
+err_ct_tuples_ht:
+	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->zone_ht);
+err_ct_zone_ht:
 err_ct_nat_tbl:
 	mlx5_chains_destroy_global_table(chains, ct_priv->ct);
 err_ct_tbl:
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net: ipv6: check return value of rhashtable_init

[MichelleJin]

When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.

Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
---

v1->v2:
 - change commit message
 - fix possible memory leaks
v2->v3:
 - nothing changed
v3->v4:
 - fix newly created warnings due to patches

 net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c | 6 +++++-
 net/ipv6/seg6.c         | 8 ++++++--
 net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c    | 4 +---
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c b/net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c
index a1ac0e3d8c60..47447f0241df 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ila/ila_xlat.c
@@ -610,7 +610,11 @@ int ila_xlat_init_net(struct net *net)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	rhashtable_init(&ilan->xlat.rhash_table, &rht_params);
+	err = rhashtable_init(&ilan->xlat.rhash_table, &rht_params);
+	if (err) {
+		free_bucket_spinlocks(ilan->xlat.locks);
+		return err;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6.c b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
index e412817fba2f..65744f2d38da 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6.c
@@ -374,7 +374,11 @@ static int __net_init seg6_net_init(struct net *net)
 	net->ipv6.seg6_data = sdata;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC
-	seg6_hmac_net_init(net);
+	if (seg6_hmac_net_init(net)) {
+		kfree(sdata);
+		kfree(rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src));
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	};
 #endif
 
 	return 0;
@@ -388,7 +392,7 @@ static void __net_exit seg6_net_exit(struct net *net)
 	seg6_hmac_net_exit(net);
 #endif
 
-	kfree(sdata->tun_src);
+	kfree(rcu_dereference_raw(sdata->tun_src));
 	kfree(sdata);
 }
 
diff --git a/net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c b/net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c
index 687d95dce085..29bc4e7c3046 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/seg6_hmac.c
@@ -405,9 +405,7 @@ int __net_init seg6_hmac_net_init(struct net *net)
 {
 	struct seg6_pernet_data *sdata = seg6_pernet(net);
 
-	rhashtable_init(&sdata->hmac_infos, &rht_params);
-
-	return 0;
+	return rhashtable_init(&sdata->hmac_infos, &rht_params);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(seg6_hmac_net_init);
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH net-next v4 3/3] net: mac80211: check return value of rhashtable_init

[MichelleJin]

When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.

Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
---

v1->v2:
 - change commit message
 - fix possible memory leaks
v2->v3:
 - nothing changed
v3-> v4:
 - nothing changed

 net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
index efbefcbac3ac..7cab1cf09bf1 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c
@@ -60,7 +60,10 @@ static struct mesh_table *mesh_table_alloc(void)
 	atomic_set(&newtbl->entries,  0);
 	spin_lock_init(&newtbl->gates_lock);
 	spin_lock_init(&newtbl->walk_lock);
-	rhashtable_init(&newtbl->rhead, &mesh_rht_params);
+	if (rhashtable_init(&newtbl->rhead, &mesh_rht_params)) {
+		kfree(newtbl);
+		return NULL;
+	}
 
 	return newtbl;
 }
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net: ipv6: check return value of rhashtable_init

[David Ahern]

On 9/26/21 9:34 PM, MichelleJin wrote:
> When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
> However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
> it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
> So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] check return value of rhashtable_init in mlx5e, ipv6, mac80211

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 03:34:54 +0000 you wrote:
> When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
> However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
> it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
> So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.
> The three patches are essentially the same logic.
> 
> v1->v2:
>  - change commit message
>  - fix possible memory leaks
> v2->v3:
>  - split patch into mlx5e, ipv6, mac80211
> v3->v4:
>  - fix newly created warnings due to patches in net/ipv6/seg6.c
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v4,1/3] net/mlx5e: check return value of rhashtable_init
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d7cade513752
  - [net-next,v4,2/3] net: ipv6: check return value of rhashtable_init
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f04ed7d277e8
  - [net-next,v4,3/3] net: mac80211: check return value of rhashtable_init
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f43bed7193a3

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net/mlx5e: check return value of rhashtable_init

[Roi Dayan]

On 2021-09-27 6:34 AM, MichelleJin wrote:
> When rhashtable_init() fails, it returns -EINVAL.
> However, since error return value of rhashtable_init is not checked,
> it can cause use of uninitialized pointers.
> So, fix unhandled errors of rhashtable_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2:
>   - change commit message
>   - fix unneeded destroying of ht
> v2->v3:
>   - nothing changed
> v3->v4:
>   - nothing changed
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> index 6c949abcd2e1..225748a9e52a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_ct.c
> @@ -2127,12 +2127,20 @@ mlx5_tc_ct_init(struct mlx5e_priv *priv, struct mlx5_fs_chains *chains,
>   
>   	ct_priv->post_act = post_act;
>   	mutex_init(&ct_priv->control_lock);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params);
> -	rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params);
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->zone_ht, &zone_params))
> +		goto err_ct_zone_ht;
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht, &tuples_ht_params))
> +		goto err_ct_tuples_ht;
> +	if (rhashtable_init(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_nat_ht, &tuples_nat_ht_params))
> +		goto err_ct_tuples_nat_ht;
>   
>   	return ct_priv;
>   
> +err_ct_tuples_nat_ht:
> +	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->ct_tuples_ht);
> +err_ct_tuples_ht:
> +	rhashtable_destroy(&ct_priv->zone_ht);
> +err_ct_zone_ht:
>   err_ct_nat_tbl:
>   	mlx5_chains_destroy_global_table(chains, ct_priv->ct);
>   err_ct_tbl:
> 

Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>