linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Cc: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/6] RDMA/rxe: Make rxe_alloc() take pool lock
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 20:16:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020231653.GA28428@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211010235931.24042-2-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 06:59:26PM -0500, Bob Pearson wrote:
> In rxe there are two separate pool APIs for creating a new object
> rxe_alloc() and rxe_alloc_locked(). Currently they are identical.
> Make rxe_alloc() take the pool lock which is in line with the other
> APIs in the library.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
>  drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c | 21 ++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> index ffa8420b4765..7a288ebacceb 100644
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> @@ -352,27 +352,14 @@ void *rxe_alloc_locked(struct rxe_pool *pool)
>  
>  void *rxe_alloc(struct rxe_pool *pool)
>  {
> -	struct rxe_type_info *info = &rxe_type_info[pool->type];
> -	struct rxe_pool_entry *elem;
> +	unsigned long flags;
>  	u8 *obj;
>  
> -	if (atomic_inc_return(&pool->num_elem) > pool->max_elem)
> -		goto out_cnt;
> -
> -	obj = kzalloc(info->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!obj)
> -		goto out_cnt;
> -
> -	elem = (struct rxe_pool_entry *)(obj + info->elem_offset);
> -
> -	elem->pool = pool;
> -	kref_init(&elem->ref_cnt);
> +	write_lock_irqsave(&pool->pool_lock, flags);
> +	obj = rxe_alloc_locked(pool);
> +	write_unlock_irqrestore(&pool->pool_lock, flags);

But why? This just makes a GFP_KERNEL allocation into a GFP_ATOMIC
allocation, which is bad.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-20 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-10 23:59 [PATCH for-next 0/6] RDMA/rxe: Fix potential races Bob Pearson
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 1/6] RDMA/rxe: Make rxe_alloc() take pool lock Bob Pearson
2021-10-20 23:16   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-10-21 17:46     ` Bob Pearson
2021-10-25 12:43       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-25 18:48         ` Robert Pearson
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 2/6] RDMA/rxe: Copy setup parameters into rxe_pool Bob Pearson
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 3/6] RDMA/rxe: Save object pointer in pool element Bob Pearson
2021-10-20 23:20   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-21 17:21     ` Bob Pearson
2021-10-25 15:40       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 4/6] RDMA/rxe: Combine rxe_add_index with rxe_alloc Bob Pearson
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 5/6] RDMA/rxe: Combine rxe_add_key " Bob Pearson
2021-10-10 23:59 ` [PATCH for-next 6/6] RDMA/rxe: Fix potential race condition in rxe_pool Bob Pearson
2021-10-20 23:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-12  6:34 ` [PATCH for-next 0/6] RDMA/rxe: Fix potential races Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-12 20:19   ` Bob Pearson
2021-10-19 13:07     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-10-19 16:35       ` Bob Pearson
2021-10-19 18:43         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-10-19 22:51           ` Bob Pearson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211020231653.GA28428@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).