From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
To: "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "cai@lca.pw" <cai@lca.pw>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>,
Feras Daoud <ferasda@mellanox.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@mellanox.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
Erez Shitrit <erezsh@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx5: reduce stack usage in FW tracer
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 21:53:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5abccf6452a9d4efa2a1593c0af6d41703d4f16f.camel@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0_VhZ9hYmc6P3Qx+Z6WSHh3PVZ7JZh7Tr=R1CAKvqWmA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 22:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 9:39 PM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 17:11 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/diag/fw_tracer.c
> > > @@ -557,16 +557,16 @@ static void mlx5_tracer_print_trace(struct
> > > tracer_string_format *str_frmt,
> > > struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,
> > > u64 trace_timestamp)
> > > {
> > > - char tmp[512];
> > > -
> >
> > Hi Arnd, thanks for the patch,
> > this function is very perfomance critical when fw traces are
> > activated
> > to pull some fw content on error situations, using kmalloc here
> > might
> > become a problem and stall the system further more if the problem
> > was
> > initially due to lack of memory.
> >
> > since this function only needs 512 bytes maybe we should mark it as
> > noinline to avoid any extra stack usages on the caller function
> > mlx5_fw_tracer_handle_traces ?
>
> That would shut up the warning, but doesn't sound right either.
>
> If it's performance critical indeed, maybe the best solution would
> be to also avoid the snprintf(), as that is also a rather heavyweight
> function?
>
> I could not find an easy solution for this, but I did notice the
> unusual way
> this deals with a variable format string passed into
> mlx5_tracer_print_trace
> along with a set of parameters, which opens up a set of possible
> format string vulnerabilities as well as making
> mlx5_tracer_print_trace()
> a bit expensive. You also take a mutex and free memory in there,
> which obviously then also got allocated in the fast path.
>
> To do this right, a better approach may be to just rely on ftrace,
> storing
> the (pointer to the) format string and the arguments in the buffer
> without
> creating a string. Would that be an option here?
I am not sure how this would work, since the format parameters can
changes depending on the FW string and the specific traces.
>
> A more minimal approach might be to move what is now the on-stack
> buffer into the mlx5_fw_tracer function. I see that you already store
> a copy of the string in there from mlx5_fw_tracer_save_trace(),
> which conveniently also holds a mutex already that protects
> it from concurrent access.
>
This sounds plausible.
So for now let's do this or the noinline approach, Please let me know
which one do you prefer, if it is the mutex protected buffer, i can do
it myself.
I will open an internal task and discussion then address your valuable
points in a future submission, since we already in rc8 I don't want to
take the risk now.
Thanks for your feedback !
Saeed.
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 15:11 [PATCH] net/mlx5: reduce stack usage in FW tracer Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-09 19:39 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-09-09 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-09 21:53 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2019-09-10 8:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-09-10 15:38 ` David Laight
2019-09-10 19:13 ` Saeed Mahameed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5abccf6452a9d4efa2a1593c0af6d41703d4f16f.camel@mellanox.com \
--to=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranbe@mellanox.com \
--cc=erezsh@mellanox.com \
--cc=ferasda@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moshe@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).