From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3176C2D0C6 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9007214AF for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730500AbfLKQdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:33:49 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:12717 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730373AbfLKQdt (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:33:49 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Dec 2019 08:33:48 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,301,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="225586853" Received: from ddalessa-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.204.32]) ([10.254.204.32]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 11 Dec 2019 08:33:47 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 00/11] rdmavt/hfi1 updates for next To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: dledford@redhat.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org References: <20191126141055.58836.79452.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com> <3a570d5b-330b-bbc6-9a7a-60a112b1c66b@intel.com> <20191211162140.GB6622@ziepe.ca> From: Dennis Dalessandro Message-ID: <5c72c47c-e5c0-3389-a16f-4cf39f2d4a86@intel.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 11:33:45 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191211162140.GB6622@ziepe.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/2019 11:21 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:34:40AM -0500, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >> On 11/26/2019 9:12 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: >>> Here are some refactoring and code reorg patches for the merge window. Nothing >>> too scary, no new features. This lays the ground work for stuff coming in >>> future merge cycles. >>> >>> There is also one bug fix, from Kaike. >>> >>> Changes from v1 >>> Fix Review-by tags with corrupted email address. >>> >>> >>> Grzegorz Andrejczuk (3): >>> IB/hfi1: Move common receive IRQ code to function >>> IB/hfi1: Decouple IRQ name from type >>> IB/hfi1: Return void in packet receiving functions >>> >>> Kaike Wan (1): >>> IB/hfi1: Don't cancel unused work item >>> >>> Michael J. Ruhl (1): >>> IB/hfi1: List all receive contexts from debugfs >>> >>> Mike Marciniszyn (6): >>> IB/hfi1: Add accessor API routines to access context members >>> IB/hfi1: Move chip specific functions to chip.c >>> IB/hfi1: Add fast and slow handlers for receive context >>> IB/hfi1: IB/hfi1: Add an API to handle special case drop >>> IB/hfi1: Create API for auto activate >>> IB/rdmavt: Correct comments in rdmavt_qp.h header >> >> I guess these didn't catch the train for 5.5 merge window. Do I need to >> resubmit to break this into two series, one for RC and one for next? > > It is more reliable if it shows in patchworks as you want Ok, you can toss this series then if you haven't yet and I'll respin and resubmit. > >> I think 1, 9, 10, and 11 could/should probably go for RC. > > Make sure they have suitable commit messages please Will do. -Denny