linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@amd.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com>,
	"Liu, Shaoyun" <Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>,
	Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
	Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@broadcom.com>,
	Jay Cornwall <Jay.Cornwall@amd.com>
Subject: Re: crash observed with pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root on VF devices.
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:03:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <978872c2-f2c7-dcc3-14d5-799755cf0726@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210908155145.GA867184@bjorn-Precision-5520>

Am 2021-09-08 um 11:51 a.m. schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
> [+cc Devesh, Jay, Felix]
>
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 06:41:50PM +0530, Selvin Xavier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A recent patch merged to 5.14 in the Broadcom RDMA driver  to call
>> pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root crashes the host while creating VFs. The
>> crash is seen when pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root is called with
>> a VF pci device.  pdev->bus->self is NULL.  Is this expected for VF?
> Sorry I missed this before.  I think you're referring to 35f5ace5dea4
> ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Enable global atomic ops if platform supports") [1],
> so I cc'd Devesh (the author).
>
> It *is* expected that virtual buses added for SR-IOV have
> bus->self == NULL, but I don't think adding a check for that is
> sufficient.
>
> The AtomicOp Requester Enable bit is in the Device Control 2 register,
> and per PCIe r5.0, sec 9.3.5.10, it is reserved in VFs and the PF
> value applies to all associated VFs.
>
> pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() does not appear to take that into
> account, so I also cc'd Jay and Felix, the authors of 430a23689dea
> ("PCI: Add pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root()") [2].
>
> It looks like we need to enable AtomicOps in the *PF*, not in the VF.
> Maybe that means pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root() should return failure
> when called on a VF, and it should be up to the driver to call it on
> the PF instead?  I'm not an expert on how VFs are used, but I don't
> like the idea of device B reaching out to change the configuration
> of device A, especially when the change also affects devices C, D,
> E, ...

Interesting timing. [+Shaoyun] is just working on SR-IOV problems with
atomic operations these days.

I think it makes sense for pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root to fail on VFs.
The guest driver either has to work without atomic ops, or it has to
rely on side-band information from the host (PF) driver to know whether
atomic ops are available.

Regards,
  Felix


>
> Bjorn
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/35f5ace5dea4
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/linus/430a23689dea
>
>> Here is the stack trace for your reference.
>> crash> bt
>> PID: 4481   TASK: ffff89c6941b0000  CPU: 53  COMMAND: "bash"
>>  #0 [ffff9a94817136d8] machine_kexec at ffffffffb90601a4
>>  #1 [ffff9a9481713728] __crash_kexec at ffffffffb9190d5d
>>  #2 [ffff9a94817137f0] crash_kexec at ffffffffb9191c4d
>>  #3 [ffff9a9481713808] oops_end at ffffffffb9025cd6
>>  #4 [ffff9a9481713828] page_fault_oops at ffffffffb906e417
>>  #5 [ffff9a9481713888] exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9a0ad14
>>  #6 [ffff9a94817138b0] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffffb9c00ace
>>     [exception RIP: pcie_capability_read_dword+28]
>>     RIP: ffffffffb952fd5c  RSP: ffff9a9481713960  RFLAGS: 00010246
>>     RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: ffff89c6b1096000  RCX: 0000000000000000
>>     RDX: ffff9a9481713990  RSI: 0000000000000024  RDI: 0000000000000000
>>     RBP: 0000000000000080   R8: 0000000000000008   R9: ffff89c64341a2f8
>>     R10: 0000000000000002  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff89c648bab000
>>     R13: 0000000000000000  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: ffff89c648bab0c8
>>     ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
>>  #7 [ffff9a9481713988] pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root at ffffffffb95359a6
>>  #8 [ffff9a94817139c0] bnxt_qplib_determine_atomics at
>> ffffffffc08c1a33 [bnxt_re]
>>  #9 [ffff9a94817139d0] bnxt_re_dev_init at ffffffffc08ba2d1 [bnxt_re]
>> #10 [ffff9a9481713a78] bnxt_re_netdev_event at ffffffffc08bab8f [bnxt_re]
>> #11 [ffff9a9481713aa8] raw_notifier_call_chain at ffffffffb9102cbe
>> #12 [ffff9a9481713ad0] register_netdevice at ffffffffb9803ff3
>> #13 [ffff9a9481713b08] register_netdev at ffffffffb980410a
>> #14 [ffff9a9481713b18] bnxt_init_one at ffffffffc0349572 [bnxt_en]
>> #15 [ffff9a9481713b70] local_pci_probe at ffffffffb953b92f
>> #16 [ffff9a9481713ba0] pci_device_probe at ffffffffb953cf8f
>> #17 [ffff9a9481713be8] really_probe at ffffffffb9659619
>> #18 [ffff9a9481713c08] __driver_probe_device at ffffffffb96598fb
>> #19 [ffff9a9481713c28] driver_probe_device at ffffffffb965998f
>> #20 [ffff9a9481713c48] __device_attach_driver at ffffffffb9659cd2
>> #21 [ffff9a9481713c70] bus_for_each_drv at ffffffffb9657307
>> #22 [ffff9a9481713ca8] __device_attach at ffffffffb96593e0
>> #23 [ffff9a9481713ce8] pci_bus_add_device at ffffffffb9530b7a
>> #24 [ffff9a9481713d00] pci_iov_add_virtfn at ffffffffb955b1ca
>> #25 [ffff9a9481713d40] sriov_enable at ffffffffb955b54b
>> #26 [ffff9a9481713d90] bnxt_sriov_configure at ffffffffc034d913 [bnxt_en]
>> #27 [ffff9a9481713dd8] sriov_numvfs_store at ffffffffb955acb4
>> #28 [ffff9a9481713e10] kernfs_fop_write_iter at ffffffffb93f09ad
>> #29 [ffff9a9481713e48] new_sync_write at ffffffffb933b82c
>> #30 [ffff9a9481713ed0] vfs_write at ffffffffb933db64
>> #31 [ffff9a9481713f00] ksys_write at ffffffffb933dd99
>> #32 [ffff9a9481713f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffb9a07897
>> #33 [ffff9a9481713f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffb9c0007c
>>     RIP: 00007f450602f648  RSP: 00007ffe880869e8  RFLAGS: 00000246
>>     RAX: ffffffffffffffda  RBX: 0000000000000002  RCX: 00007f450602f648
>>     RDX: 0000000000000002  RSI: 0000555c566c4a60  RDI: 0000000000000001
>>     RBP: 0000555c566c4a60   R8: 000000000000000a   R9: 00007f45060c2580
>>     R10: 000000000000000a  R11: 0000000000000246  R12: 00007f45063026e0
>>     R13: 0000000000000002  R14: 00007f45062fd880  R15: 0000000000000002
>>     ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001  CS: 0033  SS: 002b
>>
>> Please suggest a fix for solving this issue. Is adding a NULL check
>> for bus->self sounds okay?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Selvin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-08 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-01 13:11 crash observed with pci_enable_atomic_ops_to_root on VF devices Selvin Xavier
2021-09-07 10:49 ` Selvin Xavier
2021-09-08 15:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-08 16:03   ` Felix Kuehling [this message]
2021-09-08 17:57     ` Liu, Shaoyun
2021-09-09  9:45       ` Selvin Xavier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=978872c2-f2c7-dcc3-14d5-799755cf0726@amd.com \
    --to=felix.kuehling@amd.com \
    --cc=Jay.Cornwall@amd.com \
    --cc=Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devesh.sharma@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).