linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
To: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Cc: RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:12:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=hENc_gsbi+vJC1rP50yjzBVPRE1F5hWVFbs_iZC_9D+pjkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57235c86-0ed8-f75b-55ee-2a20b750340d@oracle.com>

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:20 PM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/18/21 7:25 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:00 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks for reporting the issue. I was able to reproduce the issue and
> >> have fixed it. Kindly try gain.
> > Do you make tests with rdma-core?
> >
> > IMHO, it is important to make tests with rdma-core before the commit
> > is sent to the community.
>
> Yes I did. However the issue shows up only when I configure an interface
> not just when module is loading.  Anyways, my apologies.

Thanks.
In my test environment, it can pass rdma-core tests.
But in this commit, a lot of default maximum values are changed.
Not sure if this will cause other issues.

Please wait for others' comments.

Thank you
Zhu Yanjun

>
> Shoaib
>
> >
> > Zhu Yanjun
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Shoaib
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/18/21 12:46 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote:
> >>> Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them.
> >>>
> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v
> >>> origin
> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$
> >>> (fetch)
> >>> origin
> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$  (push)
> >>>
> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa
> >>> fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not
> >>> in the working tree.
> >>>
> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware'
> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]#
> >>>
> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe
> >>> v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b
> >>>
> >>> You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which
> >>> value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you
> >>> are using as I have provided above.
> >>>
> >>> Shoaib
> >>>
> >>> On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Following is a link
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or just search for my name in the archive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you see any issues with this value?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem
> >>>>> "
> >>>>> [  639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded
> >>>>> [  679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded
> >>>>> [  691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem
> >>>>> "
> >>>>> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to
> >>>>> check this problem.
> >>>>> Thanks a lot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Zhu Yanjun
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I do not see the issue.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe
> >>>>> rdma_rxe              126976  0
> >>>>> ip6_udp_tunnel         16384  1 rdma_rxe
> >>>>> udp_tunnel             20480  1 rdma_rxe
> >>>>> ib_uverbs             147456  3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib
> >>>>> ib_core               364544  10
> >>>>> rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am using gdb to dump the values
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA
> >>>>> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1,
> >>>>>       RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576,
> >>>>>       RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512,
> >>>>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH =
> >>>>> 458752,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR
> >>>>> = 1,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64,
> >>>>>       RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576,
> >>>>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX =
> >>>>> 262144,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW =
> >>>>> 4096,
> >>>>>       RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144,
> >>>>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64,
> >>>>>       RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64,
> >>>>>       RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200,
> >>>>>       RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215}
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is possible that you are changing some values.
> >>>> I git clone the source code from
> >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$
> >>>> again.
> >>>> And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit.
> >>>> "
> >>>> 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum
> >>>> values used via uverbs
> >>>> 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware
> >>>> stats to device and port stats
> >>>> 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE
> >>>> "
> >>>>
> >>>> And when I tried to add a new rxe0,
> >>>> "
> >>>> error: Invalid argument
> >>>> "
> >>>> And the dmesg logs are as below:
> >>>>
> >>>> # dmesg
> >>>> "
> >>>> [   70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex,
> >>>> Flow Control: RX
> >>>> [   70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready
> >>>> [   79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded
> >>>> [   79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem
> >>>> [   79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8
> >>>> "
> >>>>
> >>>> Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again.
> >>>>
> >>>> Zhu Yanjun
> >>>>
> >>>>> Shoaib
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Shoaib
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In our internal testing we have found that the
> >>>>> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should
> >>>>> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported
> >>>>> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values
> >>>>> but they have been made suffiently large.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>     drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26
> >>>>> ++++++++++++++------------
> >>>>>     1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >>>>> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h
> >>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Zhu Yanjun
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>     static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu)
> >>>>>     {
> >>>>>            if (mtu < 256)
> >>>>> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int
> >>>>> mtu)
> >>>>>     enum rxe_device_param {
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE                 = -1ull,
> >>>>>            RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP               = 0xfffff000,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_QP_WR                   = 0x4000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_QP_WR                   = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS            = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR
> >>>>>                                            | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR
> >>>>>                                            | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG
> >>>>> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param {
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA             = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE -
> >>>>>                                              sizeof(struct
> >>>>> rxe_send_wqe),
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_SGE_RD                  = 32,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_CQ                      = 16384,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_CQ                      = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE                 = 15,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_PD                      = 0x7ffc,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_PD                      = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM              = 128,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM             = 0x3f000,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM         = 128,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP               = 8192,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH         = 56,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH     = 0x70000,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_AH                      = 100,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR                  = 0x4000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_AH                      = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR                  = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR                  = 1,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE                 = 27,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE                 = 1,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN       = 512,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_PKEYS                   = 1,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_PKEYS                   = 64,
> >>>>>            RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY          = 15,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT                = 512,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT                = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>            RXE_NUM_PORT                    = 1,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_QP                      = 0x10000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_QP                      = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX                = 16,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX                = 0x00020000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX                = 0x00040000,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_SRQ                     = 0x00001000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_SRQ                     = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX               = 0x00020001,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX               = 0x00040000,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_MR                      = 0x00001000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_MR                      = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_MW                      = 0x00001000,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX                = 0x00000001,
> >>>>> -       RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX                = 0x00010000,
> >>>>> +       RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX                = 0x00040000,
> >>>>>            RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX                = 0x00010001,
> >>>>>            RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX                = 0x00020000,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> 2.27.0
> >>>>>

      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-14  8:35 [PATCH v2 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs Rao Shoaib
2021-07-14  8:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Rao Shoaib
2021-07-15  5:02   ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-15 16:43     ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-16  4:07       ` Zhu Yanjun
     [not found]         ` <8eba2b02-36c5-e14c-3503-0e1cfeea4dd9@oracle.com>
2021-07-18  7:59           ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-18 19:46             ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-18 23:00               ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-19  2:25                 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-19  4:20                   ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-19  8:12                     ` Zhu Yanjun [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD=hENc_gsbi+vJC1rP50yjzBVPRE1F5hWVFbs_iZC_9D+pjkg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rao.shoaib@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).