From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06326C432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C930420640 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloud.ionos.com header.i=@cloud.ionos.com header.b="V66aROos" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727294AbfIYW03 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:26:29 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f47.google.com ([209.85.166.47]:39706 "EHLO mail-io1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727253AbfIYW02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:26:28 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f47.google.com with SMTP id a1so1138732ioc.6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:26:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloud.ionos.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C/DJUCljRILck0Po37+hrFOa0sfqWuVOPAKCUrIr84k=; b=V66aROosIMb5jBBfnluQ/ChzYYbV6SY6ODVcdVVDEGqvsGFciqGq4DuLnrFmOChuAc D+00HfAJi05ypBpkaukMnrYj1gmW3PMGDBeYbZQ6RDlf99pji/qetNlKZ2kMGRjDmIT4 ugHrYmSGX19gY6ydjvzlUb9F4RWS3DEAThFPC1t0Ri7AOvujQAsi5/ZQ0qzUh+Mbj6TB +g/ppjZyei7njxPGFgQ5rJ/Cgxtg9Hxd+oQQRCVC+gMM7j0DETVqDGocimqft/rMHAwg qQdU7xpxmzX9ExZfOrWiQVhEPrWuyzIegtq/sBe8m5vuraX35pSF8qwWBNHsehi0aPUp VKjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C/DJUCljRILck0Po37+hrFOa0sfqWuVOPAKCUrIr84k=; b=Am5YeEZiBRBSA1eDNLtBeEztDY8jaYKzsQ0lNLZ/+0KIPCPtuwDrcuu1HRXdghM7xb PEhfHHtFMcC0kjNvOSkNb4G5IX4qP1T1LdGztvcbhRpXxN1gzpAJUhexiW5q0ZyBpoPz WlI1EO4RlmAN/ivZHY+HnjaUuYfIw9LG7yq9vO4rl5dKt4rycF5x49b4/lIoAovB8Ua8 /kvZurURcvIzH1gBRQ1RpNBC4hjbbbtPknWf1B2JpV0GxWdLXJzg7Uk2mG+wzuocPRmP Xt8RytUiM6QYVhdiPnlKwzdqttgCq4IorSpvtdy0bgc1h8KQlIhFInkhqIX8Rfh3K5oJ 8DeA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIKrSr2ipq6QfR+IfZLY1ZzaDMA9wHCVFNevU6E8y7BTYSQgl/ wMl4I3qIMhrlCGfYYBf5f8sYEnP//e0Q3fGyFCNH X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmOrF9c5VHfSpju2N8flft/cTD7TG3CwX/rT27e1wK7P7lE0eImlkdroqKZji80vJDyR9L0D6s4qLhtkWaWJ0= X-Received: by 2002:a02:e47:: with SMTP id 68mr677176jae.126.1569450387555; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:26:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190620150337.7847-1-jinpuwang@gmail.com> <20190620150337.7847-18-jinpuwang@gmail.com> <5c5ff7df-2cce-ec26-7893-55911e4d8595@acm.org> <6f677d56-82b3-a321-f338-cbf8ff4e83eb@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <6f677d56-82b3-a321-f338-cbf8ff4e83eb@acm.org> From: Danil Kipnis Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:26:16 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/25] ibnbd: client: main functionality To: Bart Van Assche , Roman Pen Cc: Jack Wang , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Jason Gunthorpe , Doug Ledford , rpenyaev@suse.de, Jack Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 5:47 PM Bart Van Assche wrote: > Combining multiple queues (a) into a single queue (b) that is smaller > than the combined source queues without sacrificing performance is > tricky. We already have one such implementation in the block layer core > and it took considerable time to get that implementation right. See e.g. > blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx() and blk_mq_sched_restart(). Roma, can you please estimate the performance impact in case we switch to it?