linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@marvell.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>,
	"dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH rdma-next 1/2] RDMA/qedr: Fix synchronization methods and memory leaks in qedr
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 19:33:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB318226121DAB349647E1903CA19F0@MN2PR18MB3182.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191003161633.GA15026@ziepe.ca>

> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 7:17 PM
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 03:03:41PM +0300, Michal Kalderon wrote:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr_iw_cm.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr_iw_cm.c
> > index 22881d4442b9..ebc6bc25a0e2 100644
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qedr/qedr_iw_cm.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,28 @@ qedr_fill_sockaddr6(const struct qed_iwarp_cm_info
> *cm_info,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >
> > +static void qedr_iw_free_qp(struct kref *ref) {
> > +	struct qedr_qp *qp = container_of(ref, struct qedr_qp, refcnt);
> > +
> > +	xa_erase_irq(&qp->dev->qps, qp->qp_id);
> 
> why is it _irq? Where are we in an irq when using the xa_lock on this xarray?
We could be under a spin lock when called from several locations in core/iwcm.c
> 
> 
> > +	kfree(qp);
> 
> [..]
> 
> > @@ -516,8 +548,10 @@ int qedr_iw_connect(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id,
> struct iw_cm_conn_param *conn_param)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >  	ep->dev = dev;
> > +	kref_init(&ep->refcnt);
> > +
> > +	kref_get(&qp->refcnt);
> 
> Here 'qp' comes out of an xa_load, but the QP is still visible in the xarray with
> a 0 refcount, so this is invalid.
The core/iwcm takes a refcnt of the QP before calling connect, so it can't be with
refcnt zero

> 
> Also, the xa_load doesn't have any locking around it, so the entire thing looks
> wrong to me.
Since the functions calling it from core/iwcm ( connect / accept ) take a qp
Ref-cnt before the calling there's no risk of the entry being deleted while
xa_load is called

> 
> Most probably you want to hold the xa_lock during xa_load and then use a
> kref_get_not_zero - failure of the get also means the qp is not in the xarray
> 
> Or rework things so the qp is removed from the xarray earlier, I'm not sure.
This would make qedr more robust, but I think it not needed given the existing
Core/iwcm implementation. 

Thanks,
Michal
> 
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-03 12:03 [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] RDMA/qedr: Fix memory leaks and synchronization Michal Kalderon
2019-10-03 12:03 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/2] RDMA/qedr: Fix synchronization methods and memory leaks in qedr Michal Kalderon
2019-10-03 16:16   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-03 19:33     ` Michal Kalderon [this message]
2019-10-04  0:36       ` [EXT] " Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-04 17:10         ` Michal Kalderon
2019-10-04 17:28           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-06 19:49             ` Michal Kalderon
2019-10-03 12:03 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/2] RDMA/qedr: Fix memory leak in user qp and mr Michal Kalderon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR18MB318226121DAB349647E1903CA19F0@MN2PR18MB3182.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=mkalderon@marvell.com \
    --cc=aelior@marvell.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).