From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA52AC4CECD for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4B20678 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726271AbfIQJEe convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:04:34 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:34470 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726084AbfIQJEd (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:04:33 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8H93rVD070955 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:04:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com [192.155.248.81]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2v2set6n9m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 05:04:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP for from ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:31 -0000 Received: from us1a3-smtp06.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com (10.146.103.243) by smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com (10.106.227.88) with smtp.notes.na.collabserv.com ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:24 -0000 Received: from us1a3-mail162.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com ([10.146.71.4]) by us1a3-smtp06.a3.dal06.isc4sb.com with ESMTP id 2019091709042470-261544 ; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20190916162829.GA22329@ziepe.ca> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] iwcm: don't hold the irq disabled lock on iw_rem_ref From: "Bernard Metzler" To: "Jason Gunthorpe" Cc: "Krishnamraju Eraparaju" , "Steve Wise" , "Sagi Grimberg" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:04:24 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sensitivity: Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <20190916162829.GA22329@ziepe.ca>,<20190904212531.6488-1-sagi@grimberg.me> <20190910111759.GA5472@chelsio.com> <5cc42f23-bf60-ca8d-f40c-cbd8875f5756@grimberg.me> <20190910192157.GA5954@chelsio.com> <20190911155814.GA12639@chelsio.com> X-Mailer: IBM iNotes ($HaikuForm 1054) | IBM Domino Build SCN1812108_20180501T0841_FP57 August 05, 2019 at 12:42 X-LLNOutbound: False X-Disclaimed: 14559 X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 x-cbid: 19091709-3067-0000-0000-000000BA8E63 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: BY=0; FL=0; FP=0; FZ=0; HX=0; KW=0; PH=0; SC=0.40962; ST=0; TS=0; UL=0; ISC=; MB=0.000006 X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00011789; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000291; SDB=6.01262554; UDB=6.00667638; IPR=6.01044414; MB=3.00028662; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-09-17 09:04:30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unsuspicious REMOTE=unsuspicious XFE=unused X-IBM-AV-VERSION: SAVI=2019-09-17 02:42:02 - 6.00010416 x-cbparentid: 19091709-3068-0000-0000-000011D5E6F7 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-17_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Reason: safe Sender: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org -----"Jason Gunthorpe" wrote: ----- >To: "Krishnamraju Eraparaju" >From: "Jason Gunthorpe" >Date: 09/16/2019 06:28PM >Cc: "Steve Wise" , "Bernard Metzler" >, "Sagi Grimberg" , >"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" >Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [PATCH v3] iwcm: don't hold the irq >disabled lock on iw_rem_ref > >On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:28:16PM +0530, Krishnamraju Eraparaju >wrote: >> Hi Steve & Bernard, >> >> Thanks for the review comments. >> I will do those formating changes. > >I don't see anything in patchworks, but the consensus is to drop >Sagi's patch pending this future patch? > >Jason > This is my impression as well. But consensus should be explicit...Sagi, what do you think? Best regards, Bernard.