From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/17] remoteproc: Introducting new functions to start and stop an MCU References: <20200324214603.14979-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> <20200324214603.14979-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <160253ad-1be1-f8ea-573d-5a73af25b0c7@ti.com> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:08:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200324214603.14979-14-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mathieu Poirier , bjorn.andersson@linaro.org Cc: ohad@wizery.com, loic.pallardy@st.com, peng.fan@nxp.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, fabien.dessenne@st.com, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Mathieu, On 3/24/20 4:45 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Add new functions to replace direct calling of rproc->ops->start() and > rproc->ops->stop(). That way different behaviour can be played out > when booting an MCU or synchronising with it. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier > --- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++--- > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > index 488723fcb142..d3c4d7e6ca25 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c > @@ -1330,7 +1330,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > } > > /* power up the remote processor */ > - ret = rproc->ops->start(rproc); > + ret = rproc_start_hw(rproc); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "can't start rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret); > goto unprepare_subdevices; > @@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > return 0; > > stop_rproc: > - rproc->ops->stop(rproc); > + rproc_stop_hw(rproc); > unprepare_subdevices: > rproc_unprepare_subdevices(rproc); > reset_table_ptr: > @@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ static int rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc, bool crashed) > rproc->table_ptr = rproc->cached_table; > > /* power off the remote processor */ > - ret = rproc->ops->stop(rproc); > + ret = rproc_stop_hw(rproc); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "can't stop rproc: %d\n", ret); > return ret; > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > index 5f711ceb97ba..7ca23d46dfd4 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h > @@ -160,4 +160,16 @@ struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, > return NULL; > } > > +static inline int rproc_start_hw(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(start, rproc); > + return -EINVAL; > +} > + > +static inline int rproc_stop_hw(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(stop, rproc); > + return -EINVAL; > +} Since we already have the concept of subdevices, how about we call these rproc_{start/stop}_device? regards Suman > + > #endif /* REMOTEPROC_INTERNAL_H */ >