From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D865BC2D0EF for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE44B221F9 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="LYwsa1/Z" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728074AbgDQAU4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:20:56 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:41630 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726245AbgDQAU4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 20:20:56 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03H0KggD001366; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1587082842; bh=oOw75QBlpG6pb5O0bLrWeNZVrUQRVB6S4zef2wEvNww=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=LYwsa1/ZbpUDLhWUwjm55cR6Go531gQBBWc/ZrEVGak8g7Vk1LXVfmnEUAwYavQBF JJYFGKFEQ8Ag+IsmPubwW/Ma1ay+/eH58ooTGiN08oGy5xVIImlnpD/atjdqfVcB2B JpSCuEENe6ryyqVu4S4cxntsDJs55jX25Rn6mpJQ= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03H0KgSR060172 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:42 -0500 Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:42 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:41 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 03H0KfbN020917; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:41 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.70.56]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 03H0Kfkk060529; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:41 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier CC: , , , Suman Anna Subject: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Use a local copy for the name field Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:20:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20200417002036.24359-3-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0 In-Reply-To: <20200417002036.24359-1-s-anna@ti.com> References: <20200417002036.24359-1-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-remoteproc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20200417002036.f36G2BdW2J-4i5SEO_d-ozuzR79BIi-YEBLM1fqeR5Q@z> The current name field used in the remoteproc structure is simply a pointer to a name field supplied during the rproc_alloc() call. The pointer passed in by remoteproc drivers during registration is typically a dev_name pointer, but it is possible that the pointer will no longer remain valid if the devices themselves were created at runtime like in the case of of_platform_populate(), and were deleted upon any failures within the respective remoteproc driver probe function. So, allocate and maintain a local copy for this name field to keep it agnostic of the logic used in the remoteproc drivers. Signed-off-by: Suman Anna --- v1: - Patch baselined on top of Mathieu's rproc_alloc() refactor series, and so addresses Bjorn's simplified cleanup comments - Switch to {kstrdup/kfree}_const variants v0: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456385/ drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index e38f627059ac..3cebface3f26 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ static void rproc_type_release(struct device *dev) kfree(rproc->firmware); kfree(rproc->ops); + kfree_const(rproc->name); kfree(rproc); } @@ -2069,7 +2070,6 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, if (!rproc) return NULL; - rproc->name = name; rproc->priv = &rproc[1]; rproc->auto_boot = true; rproc->elf_class = ELFCLASS32; @@ -2081,6 +2081,10 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name, rproc->dev.driver_data = rproc; idr_init(&rproc->notifyids); + rproc->name = kstrdup_const(name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!rproc->name) + goto put_device; + if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware)) goto put_device; -- 2.26.0