From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com
Cc: loic.pallardy@st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@st.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:24:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424202505.29562-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424202505.29562-1-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the memory
ranges since there is no correlation between them.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 0f9d02ca4f5a..91fd59af0ffe 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -127,10 +127,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
return 0;
}
-static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct platform_device *pdev,
+ struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
{
- struct device *parent, *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
- struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+ struct device *parent, *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np;
struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mems;
struct stm32_rproc_mem_ranges *mem_range;
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
- return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(rproc);
+ return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
}
static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-24 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 20:24 [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:24 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2020-05-14 4:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 4:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 13:37 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-30 20:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 4:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation " Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:03 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:24 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get coprocessor state Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 13:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:40 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] remoteproc: stm32: Get loaded resource table for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new start ops " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:50 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:52 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new parse fw ops for synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new loaded rsc " Mathieu Poirier
2020-05-14 5:15 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-24 20:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] remoteproc: stm32: Set synchronisation state machine if needed Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 14:47 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:54 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-29 15:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for synchronising with M4 Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-05-01 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200424202505.29562-2-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).