[PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[Suman Anna]

Hi All,

The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
devm_rproc_alloc()").

v2 includes a new remoteproc core patch (patch 1) that adds an OF helper
for parsing the firmware-name property. This is refactored out to avoid
replicating the code in various remoteproc drivers. Please see the
individual patches for detailed changes. 

The main dependent patches from the previous series are now staged in
rproc-next branch. The only dependency for this series is the common
ti-sci-proc helper between R5 and DSP drivers [1]. Please see the initial
cover-letter [2] for v1 details.

regards
Suman

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456379/
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11458573/

Suman Anna (4):
  remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper
  dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs
  remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs
  remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs

 .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 +++++
 drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |  13 +
 drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |   1 +
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          |  23 +
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   2 +
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c     | 773 ++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 1002 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c

-- 
2.26.0

[PATCH v2 1/4] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper

[Suman Anna]

Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc
core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the
the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property
is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid
repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2: New patch

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init);
 
+/**
+ * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name
+ * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc
+ * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval
+ * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware
+ *           name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise.
+ *
+ * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for
+ * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer
+ * in @fw_name on success.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure.
+ */
+int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name",
+					    index, fw_name);
+	return ret ? ret : 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware);
+
 /*
  * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in
  * enum fw_resource_type.
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
 void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
 irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
 void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref);
+int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index,
+			    const char **fw_name);
 
 /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */
 int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id);
-- 
2.26.0

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed 20 May 17:10 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc
> core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the
> the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property
> is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid
> repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
> v2: New patch
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init);
>  
> +/**
> + * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name
> + * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc
> + * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval
> + * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware
> + *           name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise.
> + *
> + * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for
> + * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer
> + * in @fw_name on success.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure.
> + */
> +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name",
> +					    index, fw_name);
> +	return ret ? ret : 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware);
> +
>  /*
>   * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in
>   * enum fw_resource_type.
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
>  void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
>  irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
>  void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref);
> +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index,
> +			    const char **fw_name);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */
>  int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id);
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:03PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> Add a new helper function rproc_of_parse_firmware() to the remoteproc
> core that can be used by various remoteproc drivers to look up the
> the "firmware-name" property from a rproc device node. This property
> is already being used by multiple drivers, so this helper can avoid
> repeating equivalent code in remoteproc drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v2: New patch
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c     | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 9f04c30c4aaf..c458b218d524 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1034,6 +1034,29 @@ rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(struct device *dev, u32 of_resm_idx, size_t len,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init);
>  
> +/**
> + * rproc_of_parse_firmware() - parse and return the firmware-name
> + * @dev: pointer on device struct representing a rproc
> + * @index: index to use for the firmware-name retrieval
> + * @fw_name: pointer to a character string, in which the firmware
> + *           name is returned on success and unmodified otherwise.
> + *
> + * This is an OF helper function that parses a device's DT node for
> + * the "firmware-name" property and returns the firmware name pointer
> + * in @fw_name on success.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, or an appropriate failure.
> + */
> +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index, const char **fw_name)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, "firmware-name",
> +					    index, fw_name);
> +	return ret ? ret : 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_of_parse_firmware);
> +
>  /*
>   * A lookup table for resource handlers. The indices are defined in
>   * enum fw_resource_type.
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 4ba7cb59d3e8..e5341e91d2fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
>  void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
>  irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
>  void rproc_vdev_release(struct kref *ref);
> +int rproc_of_parse_firmware(struct device *dev, int index,
> +			    const char **fw_name);
>  
>  /* from remoteproc_virtio.c */
>  int rproc_add_virtio_dev(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int id);
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

[PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs

[Suman Anna]

Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal
Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x
CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem.
Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these
SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP
device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
 - Updated the example to include the root-node to fix the bot errors from v1
 - Added maxItems to resets, mboxes, memory-region, sram properties
 - Changed the ti,sci-proc-ids $ref to uint-array from uint-matrix
 - Addressed the minor review comments from Mathieu
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458571/

 .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cdf649655838
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: TI K3 DSP devices
+
+maintainers:
+  - Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
+
+description: |
+  The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems
+  that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms,
+  for achieving various system level goals.
+
+  These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like
+  L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory
+  controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor
+  cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a
+  TMS320C71x CorePac processor.
+
+  Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a
+  number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the
+  host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote
+  processor and to communicate with the remote processor.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp
+    description:
+      Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs
+
+  reg:
+    description: |
+      Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'.
+      Each entry should have the memory region's start address
+      and the size of the region, the representation matching
+      the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values.
+    minItems: 3
+    maxItems: 3
+
+  reg-names:
+    description: |
+      Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal
+      memory regions, and should be defined in this order
+    maxItems: 3
+    items:
+      - const: l2sram
+      - const: l1pram
+      - const: l1dram
+
+  ti,sci:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+    description:
+      Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node
+
+  ti,sci-dev-id:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+    description: |
+      Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the DSP core.
+      Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation
+      for valid values for the DSP cores.
+
+  ti,sci-proc-ids:
+    description: Should contain a single tuple of <proc_id host_id>.
+    allOf:
+      - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
+      - maxItems: 1
+        items:
+          items:
+            - description: TI-SCI processor id for the DSP core device
+            - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control
+                           ownership should be transferred to
+
+  resets:
+    description: |
+      Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node
+      managing the local resets for this device, and a reset
+      specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings
+      for the reset argument specifier,
+      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  firmware-name:
+    description: |
+      Should contain the name of the default firmware image
+      file located on the firmware search path
+
+  mboxes:
+    description: |
+      OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
+      communication with the remote processor. This property should match
+      with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The specifier
+      format is as per the bindings,
+      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  memory-region:
+    minItems: 2
+    maxItems: 8
+    description: |
+      phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc
+      device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes defined - the
+      first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring
+      buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image sections. The
+      reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as
+      per the bindings in
+      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
+
+# Optional properties:
+# --------------------
+
+  sram:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 4
+    description: |
+      phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions
+      should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
+      should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
+      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - reg-names
+ - ti,sci
+ - ti,sci-dev-id
+ - ti,sci-proc-ids
+ - resets
+ - firmware-name
+ - mboxes
+ - memory-region
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    / {
+        model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC";
+        compatible = "ti,j721e";
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        /* DSP Carveout reserved memory nodes */
+        reserved-memory {
+            #address-cells = <2>;
+            #size-cells = <2>;
+            ranges;
+
+            c66_0_dma_memory_region: c66-dma-memory@a6000000 {
+                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+                reg = <0x00 0xa6000000 0x00 0x100000>;
+                no-map;
+            };
+
+            c66_0_memory_region: c66-memory@a6100000 {
+                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+                reg = <0x00 0xa6100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
+                no-map;
+            };
+        };
+
+        cbass_main: bus@100000 {
+            compatible = "simple-bus";
+            #address-cells = <2>;
+            #size-cells = <2>;
+            ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */
+                     <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */
+                     <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */
+
+            /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */
+            c66_0: dsp@4d80800000 {
+                compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp";
+                reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>,
+                      <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>,
+                      <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>;
+                reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram";
+                ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
+                ti,sci-dev-id = <142>;
+                ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>;
+                resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>;
+                firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw";
+                memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>,
+                                <&c66_0_memory_region>;
+                mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>;
+            };
+        };
+    };
-- 
2.26.0

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:04PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal
> Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x
> CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem.
> Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these
> SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP
> device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Updated the example to include the root-node to fix the bot errors from v1

Pretty sure that was not why you had errors.

>  - Added maxItems to resets, mboxes, memory-region, sram properties
>  - Changed the ti,sci-proc-ids $ref to uint-array from uint-matrix
>  - Addressed the minor review comments from Mathieu
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458571/
> 
>  .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cdf649655838
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI K3 DSP devices
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems
> +  that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms,
> +  for achieving various system level goals.
> +
> +  These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like
> +  L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory
> +  controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor
> +  cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a
> +  TMS320C71x CorePac processor.
> +
> +  Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a
> +  number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the
> +  host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote
> +  processor and to communicate with the remote processor.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp
> +    description:
> +      Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs

What else are you going to use? There's only one compatible string. Drop 
description.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'.
> +      Each entry should have the memory region's start address
> +      and the size of the region, the representation matching
> +      the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values.

Don't need generic descriptions. That's every 'reg'.

What you can do is an 'items' list describing what each region is.

> +    minItems: 3
> +    maxItems: 3
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal
> +      memory regions, and should be defined in this order

Again, drop.

> +    maxItems: 3
> +    items:
> +      - const: l2sram
> +      - const: l1pram
> +      - const: l1dram
> +
> +  ti,sci:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> +    description:
> +      Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node
> +
> +  ti,sci-dev-id:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the DSP core.
> +      Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation
> +      for valid values for the DSP cores.
> +
> +  ti,sci-proc-ids:
> +    description: Should contain a single tuple of <proc_id host_id>.
> +    allOf:
> +      - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> +      - maxItems: 1
> +        items:
> +          items:
> +            - description: TI-SCI processor id for the DSP core device
> +            - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control
> +                           ownership should be transferred to

I assume these properties appear in multiple TI nodes? We don't need 
them defined multiple times. Create a schema for them that you can 
include here.

> +
> +  resets:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node
> +      managing the local resets for this device, and a reset
> +      specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings
> +      for the reset argument specifier,
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt

Drop.

> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  firmware-name:
> +    description: |
> +      Should contain the name of the default firmware image
> +      file located on the firmware search path
> +
> +  mboxes:
> +    description: |
> +      OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
> +      communication with the remote processor. This property should match
> +      with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The specifier
> +      format is as per the bindings,
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt

Drop. What mailbox provider is used is outside the scope of this 
binding.

> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  memory-region:
> +    minItems: 2
> +    maxItems: 8
> +    description: |
> +      phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc
> +      device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes defined - the
> +      first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring
> +      buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image sections. The
> +      reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as
> +      per the bindings in
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt

items:
  - description: dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring buffers
  - description: firmware image section ???
  - description: firmware image section ???

> +
> +# Optional properties:
> +# --------------------
> +
> +  sram:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> +    minItems: 1
> +    maxItems: 4
> +    description: |
> +      phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions
> +      should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
> +      should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - ti,sci
> + - ti,sci-dev-id
> + - ti,sci-proc-ids
> + - resets
> + - firmware-name
> + - mboxes
> + - memory-region
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    / {
> +        model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC";
> +        compatible = "ti,j721e";
> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        /* DSP Carveout reserved memory nodes */
> +        reserved-memory {
> +            #address-cells = <2>;
> +            #size-cells = <2>;
> +            ranges;
> +
> +            c66_0_dma_memory_region: c66-dma-memory@a6000000 {
> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6000000 0x00 0x100000>;
> +                no-map;
> +            };
> +
> +            c66_0_memory_region: c66-memory@a6100000 {
> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
> +                no-map;
> +            };
> +        };

Drop all of this. Outside the scope of this binding. And will likely 
start failing validation as schemas become more complete.

> +
> +        cbass_main: bus@100000 {

Drop unused labels.

> +            compatible = "simple-bus";
> +            #address-cells = <2>;
> +            #size-cells = <2>;
> +            ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */
> +                     <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */
> +                     <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */
> +
> +            /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */
> +            c66_0: dsp@4d80800000 {
> +                compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp";
> +                reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>,
> +                      <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>,
> +                      <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>;
> +                reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram";
> +                ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
> +                ti,sci-dev-id = <142>;
> +                ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>;
> +                resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>;
> +                firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw";
> +                memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>,
> +                                <&c66_0_memory_region>;
> +                mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>;
> +            };
> +        };
> +    };
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs

[Suman Anna]

Hi Rob,

On 5/28/20 5:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:04PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
>> Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal
>> Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x
>> CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem.
>> Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these
>> SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP
>> device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>>   - Updated the example to include the root-node to fix the bot errors from v1
> 
> Pretty sure that was not why you had errors.

It is because of the default values used for #address-cells and 
#size-cells in the example_template and example_start variables used in 
the dt-extract-example script. They are 1 by default, so the generated 
template ended up with the root-node using 1, and the actual example 
using 2 resulting in the mismatch.

When I updated the script to use 2 for both #address-cells and 
#size-cells, then the warnings go away. This is the reason, dtbs_check 
on my actual dts files goes through fine.

> 
>>   - Added maxItems to resets, mboxes, memory-region, sram properties
>>   - Changed the ti,sci-proc-ids $ref to uint-array from uint-matrix
>>   - Addressed the minor review comments from Mathieu
>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458571/
>>
>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..cdf649655838
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: TI K3 DSP devices
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> +  - Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> +  The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core sub-systems
>> +  that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or algorithms,
>> +  for achieving various system level goals.
>> +
>> +  These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules like
>> +  L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external memory
>> +  controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP processor
>> +  cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac processor or a
>> +  TMS320C71x CorePac processor.
>> +
>> +  Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each node has a
>> +  number of required or optional properties that enable the OS running on the
>> +  host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of the remote
>> +  processor and to communicate with the remote processor.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> +  compatible:
>> +    const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp
>> +    description:
>> +      Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs
> 
> What else are you going to use? There's only one compatible string. Drop
> description.

Is updated in a subsequent binding update where I added the C71 support.

> 
>> +
>> +  reg:
>> +    description: |
>> +      Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'.
>> +      Each entry should have the memory region's start address
>> +      and the size of the region, the representation matching
>> +      the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values.
> 
> Don't need generic descriptions. That's every 'reg'.
> 
> What you can do is an 'items' list describing what each region is.

OK, I am bit confused here. I have listed the items under the reg-names, 
while using just the minItems or maxItems here. What is the convention, 
aren't reg and reg-names associative.

> 
>> +    minItems: 3
>> +    maxItems: 3
>> +
>> +  reg-names:
>> +    description: |
>> +      Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal
>> +      memory regions, and should be defined in this order
> 
> Again, drop.

OK

> 
>> +    maxItems: 3
>> +    items:
>> +      - const: l2sram
>> +      - const: l1pram
>> +      - const: l1dram
>> +
>> +  ti,sci:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>> +    description:
>> +      Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node
>> +
>> +  ti,sci-dev-id:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>> +    description: |
>> +      Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the DSP core.
>> +      Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation
>> +      for valid values for the DSP cores.
>> +
>> +  ti,sci-proc-ids:
>> +    description: Should contain a single tuple of <proc_id host_id>.
>> +    allOf:
>> +      - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>> +      - maxItems: 1
>> +        items:
>> +          items:
>> +            - description: TI-SCI processor id for the DSP core device
>> +            - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control
>> +                           ownership should be transferred to
> 
> I assume these properties appear in multiple TI nodes? We don't need
> them defined multiple times. Create a schema for them that you can
> include here.

Only the remoteprocs, so they are limited to this binding and one more 
R5F remoteproc binding.

> 
>> +
>> +  resets:
>> +    description: |
>> +      Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node
>> +      managing the local resets for this device, and a reset
>> +      specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings
>> +      for the reset argument specifier,
>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt
> 
> Drop.

Entire description or just the reference to the reset bindings file?

> 
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  firmware-name:
>> +    description: |
>> +      Should contain the name of the default firmware image
>> +      file located on the firmware search path
>> +
>> +  mboxes:
>> +    description: |
>> +      OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
>> +      communication with the remote processor. This property should match
>> +      with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The specifier
>> +      format is as per the bindings,
>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
> 
> Drop. What mailbox provider is used is outside the scope of this
> binding.

OK.

> 
>> +    maxItems: 1
>> +
>> +  memory-region:
>> +    minItems: 2
>> +    maxItems: 8
>> +    description: |
>> +      phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the remoteproc
>> +      device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes defined - the
>> +      first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring
>> +      buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image sections. The
>> +      reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be defined as
>> +      per the bindings in
>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
> 
> items:
>    - description: dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring buffers
>    - description: firmware image section ???
>    - description: firmware image section ???

Yeah, this is scalable if we will have multiple separate DDR regions. I 
had to choose a decent maxItems value, so I chose 8. Wouldn't listing 
the individual items override the number of minItems/maxItems?

> 
>> +
>> +# Optional properties:
>> +# --------------------
>> +
>> +  sram:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>> +    minItems: 1
>> +    maxItems: 4
>> +    description: |
>> +      phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The regions
>> +      should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
>> +      should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - reg-names
>> + - ti,sci
>> + - ti,sci-dev-id
>> + - ti,sci-proc-ids
>> + - resets
>> + - firmware-name
>> + - mboxes
>> + - memory-region
>> +
>> +additionalProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    / {
>> +        model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC";
>> +        compatible = "ti,j721e";
>> +        #address-cells = <2>;
>> +        #size-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +        /* DSP Carveout reserved memory nodes */
>> +        reserved-memory {
>> +            #address-cells = <2>;
>> +            #size-cells = <2>;
>> +            ranges;
>> +
>> +            c66_0_dma_memory_region: c66-dma-memory@a6000000 {
>> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6000000 0x00 0x100000>;
>> +                no-map;
>> +            };
>> +
>> +            c66_0_memory_region: c66-memory@a6100000 {
>> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
>> +                no-map;
>> +            };
>> +        };
> 
> Drop all of this. Outside the scope of this binding. And will likely
> start failing validation as schemas become more complete.

This is a complete example because of the memory-region references below.

> 
>> +
>> +        cbass_main: bus@100000 {
> 
> Drop unused labels.

OK.

regards
Suman

> 
>> +            compatible = "simple-bus";
>> +            #address-cells = <2>;
>> +            #size-cells = <2>;
>> +            ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */
>> +                     <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */
>> +                     <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */
>> +
>> +            /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */
>> +            c66_0: dsp@4d80800000 {
>> +                compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp";
>> +                reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>,
>> +                      <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>,
>> +                      <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>;
>> +                reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram";
>> +                ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>> +                ti,sci-dev-id = <142>;
>> +                ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>;
>> +                resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>;
>> +                firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw";
>> +                memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>,
>> +                                <&c66_0_memory_region>;
>> +                mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>;
>> +            };
>> +        };
>> +    };
>> -- 
>> 2.26.0
>>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs

[Suman Anna]

Hi Rob,

On 5/28/20 5:47 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On 5/28/20 5:32 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:04PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
>>> Some Texas Instruments K3 family of SoCs have one of more Digital Signal
>>> Processor (DSP) subsystems that are comprised of either a TMS320C66x
>>> CorePac and/or a next-generation TMS320C71x CorePac processor subsystem.
>>> Add the device tree bindings document for the C66x DSP devices on these
>>> SoCs. The added example illustrates the DT nodes for the first C66x DSP
>>> device present on the K3 J721E family of SoCs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>>   - Updated the example to include the root-node to fix the bot 
>>> errors from v1
>>
>> Pretty sure that was not why you had errors.
> 
> It is because of the default values used for #address-cells and 
> #size-cells in the example_template and example_start variables used in 
> the dt-extract-example script. They are 1 by default, so the generated 
> template ended up with the root-node using 1, and the actual example 
> using 2 resulting in the mismatch.
> 
> When I updated the script to use 2 for both #address-cells and 
> #size-cells, then the warnings go away. This is the reason, dtbs_check 
> on my actual dts files goes through fine.

Just to clarify, the warnings were only because of the mismatched 
'ranges'. If I limit the example to just the dsp node, eliminating all 
ranges usage, then it passes fine.

So, you would see this with any example that uses ranges with 
#address-cells and #size-cells as 2 without explicitly using the 
appropriate top-level #address-cells and #size-cells.

> 
>>
>>>   - Added maxItems to resets, mboxes, memory-region, sram properties
>>>   - Changed the ti,sci-proc-ids $ref to uint-array from uint-matrix
>>>   - Addressed the minor review comments from Mathieu
>>> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458571/
>>>
>>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 190 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..cdf649655838
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: TI K3 DSP devices
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> +  The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more TI DSP Core 
>>> sub-systems
>>> +  that are used to offload some of the processor-intensive tasks or 
>>> algorithms,
>>> +  for achieving various system level goals.
>>> +
>>> +  These processor sub-systems usually contain additional sub-modules 
>>> like
>>> +  L1 and/or L2 caches/SRAMs, an Interrupt Controller, an external 
>>> memory
>>> +  controller, a dedicated local power/sleep controller etc. The DSP 
>>> processor
>>> +  cores in the K3 SoCs are usually either a TMS320C66x CorePac 
>>> processor or a
>>> +  TMS320C71x CorePac processor.
>>> +
>>> +  Each DSP Core sub-system is represented as a single DT node. Each 
>>> node has a
>>> +  number of required or optional properties that enable the OS 
>>> running on the
>>> +  host processor (Arm CorePac) to perform the device management of 
>>> the remote
>>> +  processor and to communicate with the remote processor.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: ti,j721e-c66-dsp
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Use "ti,j721e-c66-dsp" for C66x DSPs on K3 J721E SoCs
>>
>> What else are you going to use? There's only one compatible string. Drop
>> description.
> 
> Is updated in a subsequent binding update where I added the C71 support.

See https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11563231/.

Let me know if you prefer that I combine both of them. Any changes to 
this patch will also affect the other.

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Should contain an entry for each value in 'reg-names'.
>>> +      Each entry should have the memory region's start address
>>> +      and the size of the region, the representation matching
>>> +      the parent node's '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' values.
>>
>> Don't need generic descriptions. That's every 'reg'.
>>
>> What you can do is an 'items' list describing what each region is.
> 
> OK, I am bit confused here. I have listed the items under the reg-names, 
> while using just the minItems or maxItems here. What is the convention, 
> aren't reg and reg-names associative.
> 
>>
>>> +    minItems: 3
>>> +    maxItems: 3
>>> +
>>> +  reg-names:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Should contain strings with the names of the specific internal
>>> +      memory regions, and should be defined in this order
>>
>> Again, drop.
> 
> OK
> 
>>
>>> +    maxItems: 3
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: l2sram
>>> +      - const: l1pram
>>> +      - const: l1dram
>>> +
>>> +  ti,sci:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node
>>> +
>>> +  ti,sci-dev-id:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the DSP 
>>> core.
>>> +      Please refer to the corresponding System Controller documentation
>>> +      for valid values for the DSP cores.
>>> +
>>> +  ti,sci-proc-ids:
>>> +    description: Should contain a single tuple of <proc_id host_id>.
>>> +    allOf:
>>> +      - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
>>> +      - maxItems: 1
>>> +        items:
>>> +          items:
>>> +            - description: TI-SCI processor id for the DSP core device
>>> +            - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control
>>> +                           ownership should be transferred to
>>
>> I assume these properties appear in multiple TI nodes? We don't need
>> them defined multiple times. Create a schema for them that you can
>> include here.
> 
> Only the remoteprocs, so they are limited to this binding and one more 
> R5F remoteproc binding.

Can you confirm if these are the properties you want moved - ti,sci, 
ti,sci-dev-id and ti,sci-proc-ids? Any recommended path I should be 
using, is remoteproc folder still fine for this?

regards
Suman

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +  resets:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Should contain the phandle to the reset controller node
>>> +      managing the local resets for this device, and a reset
>>> +      specifier. Please refer to the following reset bindings
>>> +      for the reset argument specifier,
>>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti,sci-reset.txt
>>
>> Drop.
> 
> Entire description or just the reference to the reset bindings file?
> 
>>
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  firmware-name:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      Should contain the name of the default firmware image
>>> +      file located on the firmware search path
>>> +
>>> +  mboxes:
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      OMAP Mailbox specifier denoting the sub-mailbox, to be used for
>>> +      communication with the remote processor. This property should 
>>> match
>>> +      with the sub-mailbox node used in the firmware image. The 
>>> specifier
>>> +      format is as per the bindings,
>>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/omap-mailbox.txt
>>
>> Drop. What mailbox provider is used is outside the scope of this
>> binding.
> 
> OK.
> 
>>
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  memory-region:
>>> +    minItems: 2
>>> +    maxItems: 8
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      phandle to the reserved memory nodes to be associated with the 
>>> remoteproc
>>> +      device. There should be at least two reserved memory nodes 
>>> defined - the
>>> +      first one would be used for dynamic DMA allocations like 
>>> vrings and vring
>>> +      buffers, and the remaining ones used for the firmware image 
>>> sections. The
>>> +      reserved memory nodes should be carveout nodes, and should be 
>>> defined as
>>> +      per the bindings in
>>> +      
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
>>
>> items:
>>    - description: dynamic DMA allocations like vrings and vring buffers
>>    - description: firmware image section ???
>>    - description: firmware image section ???
> 
> Yeah, this is scalable if we will have multiple separate DDR regions. I 
> had to choose a decent maxItems value, so I chose 8. Wouldn't listing 
> the individual items override the number of minItems/maxItems?
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +# Optional properties:
>>> +# --------------------
>>> +
>>> +  sram:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>>> +    minItems: 1
>>> +    maxItems: 4
>>> +    description: |
>>> +      phandles to one or more reserved on-chip SRAM regions. The 
>>> regions
>>> +      should be defined as child nodes of the respective SRAM node, and
>>> +      should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
>>> +      Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - reg-names
>>> + - ti,sci
>>> + - ti,sci-dev-id
>>> + - ti,sci-proc-ids
>>> + - resets
>>> + - firmware-name
>>> + - mboxes
>>> + - memory-region
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    / {
>>> +        model = "Texas Instruments K3 J721E SoC";
>>> +        compatible = "ti,j721e";
>>> +        #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +        #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> +        /* DSP Carveout reserved memory nodes */
>>> +        reserved-memory {
>>> +            #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +            ranges;
>>> +
>>> +            c66_0_dma_memory_region: c66-dma-memory@a6000000 {
>>> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>>> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6000000 0x00 0x100000>;
>>> +                no-map;
>>> +            };
>>> +
>>> +            c66_0_memory_region: c66-memory@a6100000 {
>>> +                compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
>>> +                reg = <0x00 0xa6100000 0x00 0xf00000>;
>>> +                no-map;
>>> +            };
>>> +        };
>>
>> Drop all of this. Outside the scope of this binding. And will likely
>> start failing validation as schemas become more complete.
> 
> This is a complete example because of the memory-region references below.
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +        cbass_main: bus@100000 {
>>
>> Drop unused labels.
> 
> OK.
> 
> regards
> Suman
> 
>>
>>> +            compatible = "simple-bus";
>>> +            #address-cells = <2>;
>>> +            #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +            ranges = <0x00 0x00100000 0x00 0x00100000 0x00 
>>> 0x00020000>, /* ctrl mmr */
>>> +                     <0x4d 0x80800000 0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 
>>> 0x00800000>, /* C66_0 */
>>> +                     <0x4d 0x81800000 0x4d 0x81800000 0x00 
>>> 0x00800000>; /* C66_1 */
>>> +
>>> +            /* J721E C66_0 DSP node */
>>> +            c66_0: dsp@4d80800000 {
>>> +                compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp";
>>> +                reg = <0x4d 0x80800000 0x00 0x00048000>,
>>> +                      <0x4d 0x80e00000 0x00 0x00008000>,
>>> +                      <0x4d 0x80f00000 0x00 0x00008000>;
>>> +                reg-names = "l2sram", "l1pram", "l1dram";
>>> +                ti,sci = <&dmsc>;
>>> +                ti,sci-dev-id = <142>;
>>> +                ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x03 0xFF>;
>>> +                resets = <&k3_reset 142 1>;
>>> +                firmware-name = "j7-c66_0-fw";
>>> +                memory-region = <&c66_0_dma_memory_region>,
>>> +                                <&c66_0_memory_region>;
>>> +                mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster3 &mbox_c66_0>;
>>> +            };
>>> +        };
>>> +    };
>>> -- 
>>> 2.26.0
>>>
> 

[PATCH v2 3/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs

[Suman Anna]

The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN
voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac
module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each
of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM
and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as
either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA),
External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a
Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address
extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown
Controller (PDC).

A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of
these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external
DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and
any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support
is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout
regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB.
Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported.

The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory
carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this
is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the
remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the
DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers.
The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe
time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image
segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware
image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout
regions will be errored out.

The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller
(DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these
cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through
the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
 - Dropped the pm_runtime usage
 - Replaced the private k3_dsp_rproc_get_firmware() with the newly introduced
   rproc_of_parse_firmware()
 - Addressed other minor comments from Mathieu - Revised help on Kconfig, reordered
   header files, whitespace indentation fixes, remove the stale memset comment on
   internal memories, renamed struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem to struct k3_dsp_mem.
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458577/

 drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                |  13 +
 drivers/remoteproc/Makefile               |   1 +
 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 701 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 715 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
index 2c9fb870a276..ef787774b52b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
 	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
 	  a slave processor
 
+config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC
+	tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support"
+	depends on ARCH_K3
+	select MAILBOX
+	select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
+	help
+	  Say m here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor
+	  subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote
+	  processor framework.
+
+	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
+	  the DSP slave processors.
+
 endif # REMOTEPROC
 
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
index ea0c6812e4fc..9f87d222744c 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
@@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC)		+= st_remoteproc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC)	+= st_slim_rproc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC)		+= stm32_rproc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e4036f5992fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,701 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
+ *	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
+#include <linux/omap-mailbox.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
+
+#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
+#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
+#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
+
+#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK	(SZ_16M - 1)
+
+/**
+ * struct k3_dsp_mem - internal memory structure
+ * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
+ * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region
+ * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view
+ * @size: Size of the memory region
+ */
+struct k3_dsp_mem {
+	void __iomem *cpu_addr;
+	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
+	u32 dev_addr;
+	size_t size;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP
+ * @name: name for this memory entry
+ * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
+ */
+struct k3_dsp_mem_data {
+	const char *name;
+	const u32 dev_addr;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP
+ * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP
+ * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
+ * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
+ * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
+ */
+struct k3_dsp_dev_data {
+	const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems;
+	u32 num_mems;
+	u32 boot_align_addr;
+	bool uses_lreset;
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure
+ * @dev: cached device pointer
+ * @rproc: remoteproc device handle
+ * @mem: internal memory regions data
+ * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions
+ * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
+ * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
+ * @reset: reset control handle
+ * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data
+ * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
+ * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
+ * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
+ * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
+ * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
+ */
+struct k3_dsp_rproc {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct rproc *rproc;
+	struct k3_dsp_mem *mem;
+	int num_mems;
+	struct k3_dsp_mem *rmem;
+	int num_rmems;
+	struct reset_control *reset;
+	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
+	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
+	const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
+	u32 ti_sci_id;
+	struct mbox_chan *mbox;
+	struct mbox_client client;
+};
+
+/**
+ * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler
+ * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel
+ * @data: mailbox payload
+ *
+ * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox
+ * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains
+ * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor,
+ * and we let remoteproc core handle it.
+ *
+ * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values
+ * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very
+ * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices.
+ */
+static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc,
+						  client);
+	struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent;
+	const char *name = kproc->rproc->name;
+	u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
+
+	switch (msg) {
+	case RP_MBOX_CRASH:
+		/*
+		 * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not
+		 * supported. So, just log this for now
+		 */
+		dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name);
+		break;
+	case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY:
+		dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name);
+		break;
+	default:
+		/* silently handle all other valid messages */
+		if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG)
+			return;
+		if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) {
+			dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg);
+			return;
+		}
+		/* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */
+		if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE)
+			dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages.
+ * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed
+ * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register),
+ * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues.
+ */
+static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
+	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
+			ret);
+}
+
+/* Put the DSP processor into reset */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
+						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset))
+			dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/* Release the DSP processor from reset */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
+						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
+							  kproc->ti_sci_id))
+			dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Power up the DSP remote processor.
+ *
+ * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc
+ * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements
+ * were met.
+ */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	u32 boot_addr;
+	int ret;
+
+	client->dev = dev;
+	client->tx_done = NULL;
+	client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback;
+	client->tx_block = false;
+	client->knows_txdone = false;
+
+	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
+			PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
+	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
+	 *
+	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
+	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
+	 */
+	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
+		goto put_mbox;
+	}
+
+	boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr;
+	if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n",
+			boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto put_mbox;
+	}
+
+	dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr);
+	ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0);
+	if (ret)
+		goto put_mbox;
+
+	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc);
+	if (ret)
+		goto put_mbox;
+
+	return 0;
+
+put_mbox:
+	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Stop the DSP remote processor.
+ *
+ * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing
+ * of any pending messages.
+ */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+
+	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
+
+	k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a
+ * kernel virtual address.  The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal
+ * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these
+ * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses
+ * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel
+ * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
+ */
+static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	void __iomem *va = NULL;
+	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
+	u32 dev_addr, offset;
+	size_t size;
+	int i;
+
+	if (len == 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) {
+		bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr;
+		dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
+		size = kproc->mem[i].size;
+
+		if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) {
+			/* handle DSP-view addresses */
+			if (da >= dev_addr &&
+			    ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
+				offset = da - dev_addr;
+				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
+				return (__force void *)va;
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* handle SoC-view addresses */
+			if (da >= bus_addr &&
+			    (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) {
+				offset = da - bus_addr;
+				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
+				return (__force void *)va;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */
+	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) {
+		dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr;
+		size = kproc->rmem[i].size;
+
+		if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
+			offset = da - dev_addr;
+			va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
+			return (__force void *)va;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
+	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
+	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
+	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
+	.da_to_va	= k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va,
+};
+
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
+					struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
+{
+	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct resource *res;
+	int num_mems = 0;
+	int i;
+
+	num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
+	kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
+				  sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!kproc->mem)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
+		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+						   data->mems[i].name);
+		if (!res) {
+			dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
+				data->mems[i].name);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
+					     resource_size(res),
+					     dev_name(dev))) {
+			dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
+				data->mems[i].name);
+			return -EBUSY;
+		}
+
+		kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
+							 resource_size(res));
+		if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
+				data->mems[i].name);
+			return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
+		}
+		kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
+		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
+		kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
+
+		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
+			data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
+			kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
+			kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
+	}
+	kproc->num_mems = num_mems;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct device_node *rmem_np;
+	struct reserved_mem *rmem;
+	int num_rmems;
+	int ret, i;
+
+	num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
+						    sizeof(phandle));
+	if (num_rmems <= 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n",
+			num_rmems);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (num_rmems < 2) {
+		dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n",
+			num_rmems);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */
+	ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	num_rmems--;
+	kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!kproc->rmem) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto release_rmem;
+	}
+
+	/* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
+	for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
+		rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
+		if (!rmem_np) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto unmap_rmem;
+		}
+
+		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
+		if (!rmem) {
+			of_node_put(rmem_np);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+			goto unmap_rmem;
+		}
+		of_node_put(rmem_np);
+
+		kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
+		/* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */
+		kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
+		kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
+		kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size);
+		if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
+				i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto unmap_rmem;
+		}
+
+		dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
+			i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr,
+			kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr,
+			kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr);
+	}
+	kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
+
+	return 0;
+
+unmap_rmem:
+	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
+		if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr)
+			iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
+	}
+	kfree(kproc->rmem);
+release_rmem:
+	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++)
+		iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
+	kfree(kproc->rmem);
+
+	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
+}
+
+static
+struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
+					    const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
+{
+	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
+	u32 temp[2];
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
+					 temp, 2);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
+
+	tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tsp)
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+	tsp->dev = dev;
+	tsp->sci = sci;
+	tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
+	tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
+	tsp->host_id = temp[1];
+
+	return tsp;
+}
+
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc;
+	struct rproc *rproc;
+	const char *fw_name;
+	int ret = 0;
+	int ret1;
+
+	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name,
+			    sizeof(*kproc));
+	if (!rproc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	rproc->has_iommu = false;
+	rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
+	kproc = rproc->priv;
+	kproc->rproc = rproc;
+	kproc->dev = dev;
+	kproc->data = data;
+
+	kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci");
+	if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci);
+		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n",
+				ret);
+		}
+		kproc->ti_sci = NULL;
+		goto free_rproc;
+	}
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
+		goto put_sci;
+	}
+
+	kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset);
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret);
+		goto put_sci;
+	}
+
+	kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
+	if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp);
+		goto put_sci;
+	}
+
+	ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		goto free_tsp;
+	}
+
+	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc);
+	if (ret)
+		goto release_tsp;
+
+	ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+		goto release_tsp;
+	}
+
+	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
+			ret);
+		goto release_mem;
+	}
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc);
+
+	return 0;
+
+release_mem:
+	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
+release_tsp:
+	ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
+	if (ret1)
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1);
+free_tsp:
+	kfree(kproc->tsp);
+put_sci:
+	ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
+	if (ret1)
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1);
+free_rproc:
+	rproc_free(rproc);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	rproc_del(kproc->rproc);
+
+	ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret);
+
+	kfree(kproc->tsp);
+
+	ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret);
+
+	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
+	rproc_free(kproc->rproc);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = {
+	{ .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 },
+	{ .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 },
+	{ .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 },
+};
+
+static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = {
+	.mems = c66_mems,
+	.num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems),
+	.boot_align_addr = SZ_1K,
+	.uses_lreset = true,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, },
+	{ /* sentinel */ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = {
+	.probe	= k3_dsp_rproc_probe,
+	.remove	= k3_dsp_rproc_remove,
+	.driver	= {
+		.name = "k3-dsp-rproc",
+		.of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match,
+	},
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver");
-- 
2.26.0

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed 20 May 17:10 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN
> voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac
> module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each
> of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM
> and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as
> either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA),
> External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a
> Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address
> extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown
> Controller (PDC).
> 
> A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of
> these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external
> DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and
> any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support
> is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout
> regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB.
> Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported.
> 
> The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory
> carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this
> is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the
> remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the
> DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers.
> The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe
> time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image
> segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware
> image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout
> regions will be errored out.
> 
> The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller
> (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these
> cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through
> the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes.
> 

There's room for more devm_ usage, but this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Dropped the pm_runtime usage
>  - Replaced the private k3_dsp_rproc_get_firmware() with the newly introduced
>    rproc_of_parse_firmware()
>  - Addressed other minor comments from Mathieu - Revised help on Kconfig, reordered
>    header files, whitespace indentation fixes, remove the stale memset comment on
>    internal memories, renamed struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem to struct k3_dsp_mem.
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458577/
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                |  13 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/Makefile               |   1 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 701 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 715 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> index 2c9fb870a276..ef787774b52b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> @@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>  	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>  	  a slave processor
>  
> +config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC
> +	tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support"
> +	depends on ARCH_K3
> +	select MAILBOX
> +	select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
> +	help
> +	  Say m here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor
> +	  subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote
> +	  processor framework.
> +
> +	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> +	  the DSP slave processors.
> +
>  endif # REMOTEPROC
>  
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index ea0c6812e4fc..9f87d222744c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC)		+= st_remoteproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC)	+= st_slim_rproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC)		+= stm32_rproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e4036f5992fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,701 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> + *	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/omap-mailbox.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
> +
> +#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
> +
> +#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK	(SZ_16M - 1)
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_mem - internal memory structure
> + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region
> + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view
> + * @size: Size of the memory region
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_mem {
> +	void __iomem *cpu_addr;
> +	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> +	u32 dev_addr;
> +	size_t size;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP
> + * @name: name for this memory entry
> + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_mem_data {
> +	const char *name;
> +	const u32 dev_addr;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP
> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP
> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_dev_data {
> +	const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems;
> +	u32 num_mems;
> +	u32 boot_align_addr;
> +	bool uses_lreset;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure
> + * @dev: cached device pointer
> + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle
> + * @mem: internal memory regions data
> + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions
> + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
> + * @reset: reset control handle
> + * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data
> + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
> + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
> + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
> + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_rproc {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	struct k3_dsp_mem *mem;
> +	int num_mems;
> +	struct k3_dsp_mem *rmem;
> +	int num_rmems;
> +	struct reset_control *reset;
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
> +	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> +	const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> +	u32 ti_sci_id;
> +	struct mbox_chan *mbox;
> +	struct mbox_client client;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler
> + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel
> + * @data: mailbox payload
> + *
> + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox
> + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains
> + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor,
> + * and we let remoteproc core handle it.
> + *
> + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values
> + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very
> + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices.
> + */
> +static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc,
> +						  client);
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent;
> +	const char *name = kproc->rproc->name;
> +	u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
> +
> +	switch (msg) {
> +	case RP_MBOX_CRASH:
> +		/*
> +		 * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not
> +		 * supported. So, just log this for now
> +		 */
> +		dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name);
> +		break;
> +	case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY:
> +		dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/* silently handle all other valid messages */
> +		if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG)
> +			return;
> +		if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		/* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */
> +		if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE)
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages.
> + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed
> + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register),
> + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues.
> + */
> +static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +}
> +
> +/* Put the DSP processor into reset */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset))
> +			dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Release the DSP processor from reset */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +							  kproc->ti_sci_id))
> +			dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Power up the DSP remote processor.
> + *
> + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc
> + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements
> + * were met.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	u32 boot_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	client->dev = dev;
> +	client->tx_done = NULL;
> +	client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback;
> +	client->tx_block = false;
> +	client->knows_txdone = false;
> +
> +	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> +			PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> +	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
> +	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
> +	 */
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +	}
> +
> +	boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr;
> +	if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n",
> +			boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr);
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +put_mbox:
> +	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Stop the DSP remote processor.
> + *
> + * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing
> + * of any pending messages.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> +
> +	k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a
> + * kernel virtual address.  The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal
> + * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these
> + * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses
> + * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel
> + * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
> + */
> +static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	void __iomem *va = NULL;
> +	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> +	u32 dev_addr, offset;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (len == 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) {
> +		bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr;
> +		dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
> +		size = kproc->mem[i].size;
> +
> +		if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) {
> +			/* handle DSP-view addresses */
> +			if (da >= dev_addr &&
> +			    ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> +				offset = da - dev_addr;
> +				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +				return (__force void *)va;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* handle SoC-view addresses */
> +			if (da >= bus_addr &&
> +			    (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) {
> +				offset = da - bus_addr;
> +				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +				return (__force void *)va;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) {
> +		dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr;
> +		size = kproc->rmem[i].size;
> +
> +		if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> +			offset = da - dev_addr;
> +			va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +			return (__force void *)va;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> +	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
> +	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
> +	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
> +	.da_to_va	= k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va,
> +};
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +					struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int num_mems = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
> +	kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
> +				  sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kproc->mem)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> +		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +						   data->mems[i].name);
> +		if (!res) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +		if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> +					     resource_size(res),
> +					     dev_name(dev))) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
> +
> +		kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
> +							 resource_size(res));
> +		if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
> +		}
> +		kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> +		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
> +		kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
> +
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> +			data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> +			kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
> +			kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
> +	}
> +	kproc->num_mems = num_mems;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *rmem_np;
> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> +	int num_rmems;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> +						    sizeof(phandle));
> +	if (num_rmems <= 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n",
> +			num_rmems);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	if (num_rmems < 2) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n",
> +			num_rmems);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */
> +	ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	num_rmems--;
> +	kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kproc->rmem) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto release_rmem;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
> +		rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
> +		if (!rmem_np) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +
> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> +		if (!rmem) {
> +			of_node_put(rmem_np);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +		of_node_put(rmem_np);
> +
> +		kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
> +		/* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */
> +		kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
> +		kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
> +		kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> +		if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
> +				i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> +			i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr,
> +			kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr,
> +			kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr);
> +	}
> +	kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +unmap_rmem:
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr)
> +			iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
> +	}
> +	kfree(kproc->rmem);
> +release_rmem:
> +	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++)
> +		iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
> +	kfree(kproc->rmem);
> +
> +	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static
> +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> +					    const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> +	u32 temp[2];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> +					 temp, 2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tsp)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	tsp->dev = dev;
> +	tsp->sci = sci;
> +	tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> +	tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> +	tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> +
> +	return tsp;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	const char *fw_name;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret1;
> +
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name,
> +			    sizeof(*kproc));
> +	if (!rproc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	rproc->has_iommu = false;
> +	rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> +	kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	kproc->rproc = rproc;
> +	kproc->dev = dev;
> +	kproc->data = data;
> +
> +	kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci");
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci);
> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +		}
> +		kproc->ti_sci = NULL;
> +		goto free_rproc;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset);
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp);
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto free_tsp;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto release_tsp;
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto release_tsp;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		goto release_mem;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +release_mem:
> +	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
> +release_tsp:
> +	ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret1)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1);
> +free_tsp:
> +	kfree(kproc->tsp);
> +put_sci:
> +	ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (ret1)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1);
> +free_rproc:
> +	rproc_free(rproc);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rproc_del(kproc->rproc);
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	kfree(kproc->tsp);
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
> +	rproc_free(kproc->rproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = {
> +	{ .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 },
> +	{ .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 },
> +	{ .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = {
> +	.mems = c66_mems,
> +	.num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems),
> +	.boot_align_addr = SZ_1K,
> +	.uses_lreset = true,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = {
> +	.probe	= k3_dsp_rproc_probe,
> +	.remove	= k3_dsp_rproc_remove,
> +	.driver	= {
> +		.name = "k3-dsp-rproc",
> +		.of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver");
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:05PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> The Texas Instrument's K3 J721E SoCs have two C66x DSP Subsystems in MAIN
> voltage domain that are based on the TI's standard TMS320C66x DSP CorePac
> module. Each subsystem has a Fixed/Floating-Point DSP CPU, with 32 KB each
> of L1P & L1D SRAMs that can be configured and partitioned as either RAM
> and/or Cache, and 288 KB of L2 SRAM with 256 KB of memory configurable as
> either RAM and/or Cache. The CorePac also includes an Internal DMA (IDMA),
> External Memory Controller (EMC), Extended Memory Controller (XMC) with a
> Region Address Translator (RAT) unit for 32-bit to 48-bit address
> extension/translations, an Interrupt Controller (INTC) and a Powerdown
> Controller (PDC).
> 
> A new remoteproc module is added to perform the device management of
> these DSP devices. The support is limited to images using only external
> DDR memory at the moment, the loading support to internal memories and
> any on-chip RAM memories will be added in a subsequent patch. RAT support
> is also left for a future patch, and as such the reserved memory carveout
> regions are all expected to be using memory regions within the first 2 GB.
> Error Recovery and Power Management features are not currently supported.
> 
> The C66x remote processors do not have an MMU, and so require fixed memory
> carveout regions matching the firmware image addresses. Support for this
> is provided by mandating multiple memory regions to be attached to the
> remoteproc device. The first memory region will be used to serve as the
> DMA pool for all dynamic allocations like the vrings and vring buffers.
> The remaining memory regions are mapped into the kernel at device probe
> time, and are used to provide address translations for firmware image
> segments without the need for any RSC_CARVEOUT entries. Any firmware
> image using memory outside of the supplied reserved memory carveout
> regions will be errored out.
> 
> The driver uses various TI-SCI interfaces to talk to the System Controller
> (DMSC) for managing configuration, power and reset management of these
> cores. IPC between the A72 cores and the DSP cores is supported through
> the virtio rpmsg stack using shared memory and OMAP Mailboxes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Dropped the pm_runtime usage
>  - Replaced the private k3_dsp_rproc_get_firmware() with the newly introduced
>    rproc_of_parse_firmware()
>  - Addressed other minor comments from Mathieu - Revised help on Kconfig, reordered
>    header files, whitespace indentation fixes, remove the stale memset comment on
>    internal memories, renamed struct k3_dsp_rproc_mem to struct k3_dsp_mem.
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458577/
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                |  13 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/Makefile               |   1 +
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 701 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 715 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
>

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> index 2c9fb870a276..ef787774b52b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> @@ -265,6 +265,19 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>  	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>  	  a slave processor
>  
> +config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC
> +	tristate "TI K3 DSP remoteproc support"
> +	depends on ARCH_K3
> +	select MAILBOX
> +	select OMAP2PLUS_MBOX
> +	help
> +	  Say m here to support TI's C66x and C71x DSP remote processor
> +	  subsystems on various TI K3 family of SoCs through the remote
> +	  processor framework.
> +
> +	  It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> +	  the DSP slave processors.
> +
>  endif # REMOTEPROC
>  
>  endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> index ea0c6812e4fc..9f87d222744c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> @@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC)		+= st_remoteproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC)	+= st_slim_rproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC)		+= stm32_rproc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC)	+= ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e4036f5992fe
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,701 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * TI K3 DSP Remote Processor(s) driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com/
> + *	Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> +#include <linux/omap-mailbox.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +#include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
> +
> +#include "omap_remoteproc.h"
> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> +#include "ti_sci_proc.h"
> +
> +#define KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK	(SZ_16M - 1)
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_mem - internal memory structure
> + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region
> + * @dev_addr: Device address of the memory region from DSP view
> + * @size: Size of the memory region
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_mem {
> +	void __iomem *cpu_addr;
> +	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> +	u32 dev_addr;
> +	size_t size;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_mem_data - memory definitions for a DSP
> + * @name: name for this memory entry
> + * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_mem_data {
> +	const char *name;
> +	const u32 dev_addr;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_dev_data - device data structure for a DSP
> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a DSP
> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_dev_data {
> +	const struct k3_dsp_mem_data *mems;
> +	u32 num_mems;
> +	u32 boot_align_addr;
> +	bool uses_lreset;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * struct k3_dsp_rproc - k3 DSP remote processor driver structure
> + * @dev: cached device pointer
> + * @rproc: remoteproc device handle
> + * @mem: internal memory regions data
> + * @num_mems: number of internal memory regions
> + * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> + * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
> + * @reset: reset control handle
> + * @data: pointer to DSP-specific device data
> + * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
> + * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
> + * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> + * @mbox: mailbox channel handle
> + * @client: mailbox client to request the mailbox channel
> + */
> +struct k3_dsp_rproc {
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	struct k3_dsp_mem *mem;
> +	int num_mems;
> +	struct k3_dsp_mem *rmem;
> +	int num_rmems;
> +	struct reset_control *reset;
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
> +	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> +	const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> +	u32 ti_sci_id;
> +	struct mbox_chan *mbox;
> +	struct mbox_client client;
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback() - inbound mailbox message handler
> + * @client: mailbox client pointer used for requesting the mailbox channel
> + * @data: mailbox payload
> + *
> + * This handler is invoked by the OMAP mailbox driver whenever a mailbox
> + * message is received. Usually, the mailbox payload simply contains
> + * the index of the virtqueue that is kicked by the remote processor,
> + * and we let remoteproc core handle it.
> + *
> + * In addition to virtqueue indices, we also have some out-of-band values
> + * that indicate different events. Those values are deliberately very
> + * large so they don't coincide with virtqueue indices.
> + */
> +static void k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback(struct mbox_client *client, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = container_of(client, struct k3_dsp_rproc,
> +						  client);
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->rproc->dev.parent;
> +	const char *name = kproc->rproc->name;
> +	u32 msg = omap_mbox_message(data);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "mbox msg: 0x%x\n", msg);
> +
> +	switch (msg) {
> +	case RP_MBOX_CRASH:
> +		/*
> +		 * remoteproc detected an exception, but error recovery is not
> +		 * supported. So, just log this for now
> +		 */
> +		dev_err(dev, "K3 DSP rproc %s crashed\n", name);
> +		break;
> +	case RP_MBOX_ECHO_REPLY:
> +		dev_info(dev, "received echo reply from %s\n", name);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/* silently handle all other valid messages */
> +		if (msg >= RP_MBOX_READY && msg < RP_MBOX_END_MSG)
> +			return;
> +		if (msg > kproc->rproc->max_notifyid) {
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "dropping unknown message 0x%x", msg);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		/* msg contains the index of the triggered vring */
> +		if (rproc_vq_interrupt(kproc->rproc, msg) == IRQ_NONE)
> +			dev_dbg(dev, "no message was found in vqid %d\n", msg);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Kick the remote processor to notify about pending unprocessed messages.
> + * The vqid usage is not used and is inconsequential, as the kick is performed
> + * through a simulated GPIO (a bit in an IPC interrupt-triggering register),
> + * the remote processor is expected to process both its Tx and Rx virtqueues.
> + */
> +static void k3_dsp_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	mbox_msg_t msg = (mbox_msg_t)vqid;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* send the index of the triggered virtqueue in the mailbox payload */
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)msg);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to send mailbox message, status = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +}
> +
> +/* Put the DSP processor into reset */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_assert(kproc->reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "local-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		if (reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset))
> +			dev_warn(dev, "local-reset deassert back failed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* Release the DSP processor from reset */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		if (kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +							  kproc->ti_sci_id))
> +			dev_warn(dev, "module-reset assert back failed\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Power up the DSP remote processor.
> + *
> + * This function will be invoked only after the firmware for this rproc
> + * was loaded, parsed successfully, and all of its resource requirements
> + * were met.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct mbox_client *client = &kproc->client;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	u32 boot_addr;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	client->dev = dev;
> +	client->tx_done = NULL;
> +	client->rx_callback = k3_dsp_rproc_mbox_callback;
> +	client->tx_block = false;
> +	client->knows_txdone = false;
> +
> +	kproc->mbox = mbox_request_channel(client, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->mbox)) {
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		dev_err(dev, "mbox_request_channel failed: %ld\n",
> +			PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox));
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now;
> +	 * there is no functional effect whatsoever.
> +	 *
> +	 * Note that the reply will _not_ arrive immediately: this message
> +	 * will wait in the mailbox fifo until the remote processor is booted.
> +	 */
> +	ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed: %d\n", ret);
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +	}
> +
> +	boot_addr = rproc->bootaddr;
> +	if (boot_addr & (kproc->data->boot_align_addr - 1)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "invalid boot address 0x%x, must be aligned on a 0x%x boundary\n",
> +			boot_addr, kproc->data->boot_align_addr);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +	}
> +
> +	dev_err(dev, "booting DSP core using boot addr = 0x%x\n", boot_addr);
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_set_config(kproc->tsp, boot_addr, 0, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_release(kproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto put_mbox;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +put_mbox:
> +	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Stop the DSP remote processor.
> + *
> + * This function puts the DSP processor into reset, and finishes processing
> + * of any pending messages.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
> +
> +	k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Custom function to translate a DSP device address (internal RAMs only) to a
> + * kernel virtual address.  The DSPs can access their RAMs at either an internal
> + * address visible only from a DSP, or at the SoC-level bus address. Both these
> + * addresses need to be looked through for translation. The translated addresses
> + * can be used either by the remoteproc core for loading (when using kernel
> + * remoteproc loader), or by any rpmsg bus drivers.
> + */
> +static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	void __iomem *va = NULL;
> +	phys_addr_t bus_addr;
> +	u32 dev_addr, offset;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (len == 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_mems; i++) {
> +		bus_addr = kproc->mem[i].bus_addr;
> +		dev_addr = kproc->mem[i].dev_addr;
> +		size = kproc->mem[i].size;
> +
> +		if (da < KEYSTONE_RPROC_LOCAL_ADDRESS_MASK) {
> +			/* handle DSP-view addresses */
> +			if (da >= dev_addr &&
> +			    ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> +				offset = da - dev_addr;
> +				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +				return (__force void *)va;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* handle SoC-view addresses */
> +			if (da >= bus_addr &&
> +			    (da + len) <= (bus_addr + size)) {
> +				offset = da - bus_addr;
> +				va = kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +				return (__force void *)va;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* handle static DDR reserved memory regions */
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++) {
> +		dev_addr = kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr;
> +		size = kproc->rmem[i].size;
> +
> +		if (da >= dev_addr && ((da + len) <= (dev_addr + size))) {
> +			offset = da - dev_addr;
> +			va = kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr + offset;
> +			return (__force void *)va;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> +	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
> +	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
> +	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
> +	.da_to_va	= k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va,
> +};
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +					struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int num_mems = 0;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
> +	kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
> +				  sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kproc->mem)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> +		res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +						   data->mems[i].name);
> +		if (!res) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +		if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> +					     resource_size(res),
> +					     dev_name(dev))) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +		}
> +
> +		kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, res->start,
> +							 resource_size(res));
> +		if (IS_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> +				data->mems[i].name);
> +			return PTR_ERR(kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr);
> +		}
> +		kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> +		kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
> +		kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
> +
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> +			data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> +			kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
> +			kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
> +	}
> +	kproc->num_mems = num_mems;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *rmem_np;
> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> +	int num_rmems;
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	num_rmems = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> +						    sizeof(phandle));
> +	if (num_rmems <= 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device does not reserved memory regions, ret = %d\n",
> +			num_rmems);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +	if (num_rmems < 2) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device needs atleast two memory regions to be defined, num = %d\n",
> +			num_rmems);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* use reserved memory region 0 for vring DMA allocations */
> +	ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx(dev, np, 0);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device cannot initialize DMA pool, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	num_rmems--;
> +	kproc->rmem = kcalloc(num_rmems, sizeof(*kproc->rmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!kproc->rmem) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto release_rmem;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
> +		rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
> +		if (!rmem_np) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +
> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> +		if (!rmem) {
> +			of_node_put(rmem_np);
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +		of_node_put(rmem_np);
> +
> +		kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
> +		/* 64-bit address regions currently not supported */
> +		kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
> +		kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
> +		kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size);
> +		if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
> +				i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto unmap_rmem;
> +		}
> +
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> +			i + 1, &kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr,
> +			kproc->rmem[i].size, kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr,
> +			kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr);
> +	}
> +	kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +unmap_rmem:
> +	for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
> +		if (kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr)
> +			iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
> +	}
> +	kfree(kproc->rmem);
> +release_rmem:
> +	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++)
> +		iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
> +	kfree(kproc->rmem);
> +
> +	of_reserved_mem_device_release(kproc->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static
> +struct ti_sci_proc *k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(struct device *dev,
> +					    const struct ti_sci_handle *sci)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> +	u32 temp[2];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "ti,sci-proc-ids",
> +					 temp, 2);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	tsp = kzalloc(sizeof(*tsp), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tsp)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	tsp->dev = dev;
> +	tsp->sci = sci;
> +	tsp->ops = &sci->ops.proc_ops;
> +	tsp->proc_id = temp[0];
> +	tsp->host_id = temp[1];
> +
> +	return tsp;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	const struct k3_dsp_dev_data *data;
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc;
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	const char *fw_name;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret1;
> +
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to parse firmware-name property, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &k3_dsp_rproc_ops, fw_name,
> +			    sizeof(*kproc));
> +	if (!rproc)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	rproc->has_iommu = false;
> +	rproc->recovery_disabled = true;
> +	kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	kproc->rproc = rproc;
> +	kproc->dev = dev;
> +	kproc->data = data;
> +
> +	kproc->ti_sci = ti_sci_get_by_phandle(np, "ti,sci");
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->ti_sci)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->ti_sci);
> +		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get ti-sci handle, ret = %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +		}
> +		kproc->ti_sci = NULL;
> +		goto free_rproc;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "ti,sci-dev-id", &kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "missing 'ti,sci-dev-id' property\n");
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	kproc->reset = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->reset)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->reset);
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset, status = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	kproc->tsp = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_tsp(dev, kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (IS_ERR(kproc->tsp)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to construct ti-sci proc control, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(kproc->tsp);
> +		goto put_sci;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_request(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "ti_sci_proc_request failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto free_tsp;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_rproc_of_get_memories(pdev, kproc);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto release_tsp;
> +
> +	ret = k3_dsp_reserved_mem_init(kproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "reserved memory init failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +		goto release_tsp;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +		goto release_mem;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, kproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +release_mem:
> +	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
> +release_tsp:
> +	ret1 = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret1)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret1);
> +free_tsp:
> +	kfree(kproc->tsp);
> +put_sci:
> +	ret1 = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (ret1)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret1);
> +free_rproc:
> +	rproc_free(rproc);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rproc_del(kproc->rproc);
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_proc_release(kproc->tsp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to release proc, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	kfree(kproc->tsp);
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_put_handle(kproc->ti_sci);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "failed to put ti_sci handle, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	k3_dsp_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
> +	rproc_free(kproc->rproc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = {
> +	{ .name = "l2sram", .dev_addr = 0x800000 },
> +	{ .name = "l1pram", .dev_addr = 0xe00000 },
> +	{ .name = "l1dram", .dev_addr = 0xf00000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct k3_dsp_dev_data c66_data = {
> +	.mems = c66_mems,
> +	.num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(c66_mems),
> +	.boot_align_addr = SZ_1K,
> +	.uses_lreset = true,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id k3_dsp_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,j721e-c66-dsp", .data = &c66_data, },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_dsp_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver k3_dsp_rproc_driver = {
> +	.probe	= k3_dsp_rproc_probe,
> +	.remove	= k3_dsp_rproc_remove,
> +	.driver	= {
> +		.name = "k3-dsp-rproc",
> +		.of_match_table = k3_dsp_of_match,
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +module_platform_driver(k3_dsp_rproc_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI K3 DSP Remoteproc driver");
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

[PATCH v2 4/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs

[Suman Anna]

The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the
Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two
resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local
reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other
sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems.

The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to
boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the
local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using
the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support
for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on
SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc
mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine.

Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware
does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs.

Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
---
v2:
 - Dropped the local-reset no-op checks from k3_dsp_rproc_prepare/unprepare()
   callbacks. The logic will be adjusted back in the C71 patch series.
 - The C71 local reset references are also removed from the comments for the
   k3_dsp_rproc_prepare() function.
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458579/

 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
index e4036f5992fe..610fbbf85ee6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
@@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
+		return ret;
+
 	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
 						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -191,6 +194,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
 	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
+		goto lreset;
+
 	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
 						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+lreset:
 	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
@@ -209,6 +216,53 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+/*
+ * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
+ * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal
+ * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is
+ * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP
+ * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any
+ * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to
+ * actually let the C66x DSP cores run.
+ */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
+						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n",
+			ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary
+ * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the
+ * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of
+ * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the
+ * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked
+ * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global
+ * reset.
+ */
+static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
+						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Power up the DSP remote processor.
  *
@@ -352,6 +406,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
 }
 
 static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
+	.prepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_prepare,
+	.unprepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
 	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
 	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
@@ -614,6 +670,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto release_tsp;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't
+	 * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released.
+	 */
+	if (data->uses_lreset) {
+		ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n",
+				ret);
+			goto release_mem;
+		} else if (ret == 0) {
+			dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n");
+			k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
-- 
2.26.0

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Wed 20 May 17:10 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the
> Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two
> resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local
> reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other
> sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems.
> 
> The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to
> boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the
> local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using
> the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support
> for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on
> SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc
> mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine.
> 
> Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware
> does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
> v2:
>  - Dropped the local-reset no-op checks from k3_dsp_rproc_prepare/unprepare()
>    callbacks. The logic will be adjusted back in the C71 patch series.
>  - The C71 local reset references are also removed from the comments for the
>    k3_dsp_rproc_prepare() function.
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458579/
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index e4036f5992fe..610fbbf85ee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
>  						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -191,6 +194,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> +		goto lreset;
> +
>  	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
>  						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +lreset:
>  	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> @@ -209,6 +216,53 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
> + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal
> + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is
> + * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP
> + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any
> + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to
> + * actually let the C66x DSP cores run.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary
> + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the
> + * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of
> + * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the
> + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked
> + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global
> + * reset.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Power up the DSP remote processor.
>   *
> @@ -352,6 +406,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> +	.prepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_prepare,
> +	.unprepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
>  	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
>  	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
> @@ -614,6 +670,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto release_tsp;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't
> +	 * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released.
> +	 */
> +	if (data->uses_lreset) {
> +		ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +			goto release_mem;
> +		} else if (ret == 0) {
> +			dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n");
> +			k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 07:10:06PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> The resets for the DSP processors on K3 SoCs are managed through the
> Power and Sleep Controller (PSC) module. Each DSP typically has two
> resets - a global module reset for powering on the device, and a local
> reset that affects only the CPU while allowing access to the other
> sub-modules within the DSP processor sub-systems.
> 
> The C66x DSPs have two levels of internal RAMs that can be used to
> boot from, and the firmware loading into these RAMs require the
> local reset to be asserted with the device powered on/enabled using
> the module reset. Enhance the K3 DSP remoteproc driver to add support
> for loading into the internal RAMs. The local reset is deasserted on
> SoC power-on-reset, so logic has to be added in probe in remoteproc
> mode to balance the remoteproc state-machine.
> 
> Note that the local resets are a no-op on C71x cores, and the hardware
> does not supporting loading into its internal RAMs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
> ---
> v2:
>  - Dropped the local-reset no-op checks from k3_dsp_rproc_prepare/unprepare()
>    callbacks. The logic will be adjusted back in the C71 patch series.
>  - The C71 local reset references are also removed from the comments for the
>    k3_dsp_rproc_prepare() function.
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11458579/
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> index e4036f5992fe..610fbbf85ee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_reset(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
>  						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -191,6 +194,9 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	if (kproc->data->uses_lreset)
> +		goto lreset;
> +
>  	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
>  						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
>  	if (ret) {
> @@ -198,6 +204,7 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +lreset:
>  	ret = reset_control_deassert(kproc->reset);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "local-reset deassert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> @@ -209,6 +216,53 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * The C66x DSP cores have a local reset that affects only the CPU, and a
> + * generic module reset that powers on the device and allows the DSP internal
> + * memories to be accessed while the local reset is asserted. This function is
> + * used to release the global reset on C66x DSPs to allow loading into the DSP
> + * internal RAMs. The .prepare() ops is invoked by remoteproc core before any
> + * firmware loading, and is followed by the .start() ops after loading to
> + * actually let the C66x DSP cores run.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.get_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset deassert failed, cannot enable internal RAM loading, ret = %d\n",
> +			ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function implements the .unprepare() ops and performs the complimentary
> + * operations to that of the .prepare() ops. The function is used to assert the
> + * global reset on applicable C66x cores. This completes the second portion of
> + * powering down the C66x DSP cores. The cores themselves are only halted in the
> + * .stop() callback through the local reset, and the .unprepare() ops is invoked
> + * by the remoteproc core after the remoteproc is stopped to balance the global
> + * reset.
> + */
> +static int k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = kproc->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.put_device(kproc->ti_sci,
> +						    kproc->ti_sci_id);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(dev, "module-reset assert failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Power up the DSP remote processor.
>   *
> @@ -352,6 +406,8 @@ static void *k3_dsp_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct rproc_ops k3_dsp_rproc_ops = {
> +	.prepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_prepare,
> +	.unprepare	= k3_dsp_rproc_unprepare,
>  	.start		= k3_dsp_rproc_start,
>  	.stop		= k3_dsp_rproc_stop,
>  	.kick		= k3_dsp_rproc_kick,
> @@ -614,6 +670,22 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto release_tsp;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * ensure the DSP local reset is asserted to ensure the DSP doesn't
> +	 * execute bogus code in .prepare() when the module reset is released.
> +	 */
> +	if (data->uses_lreset) {
> +		ret = reset_control_status(kproc->reset);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get reset status, status = %d\n",
> +				ret);
> +			goto release_mem;
> +		} else if (ret == 0) {
> +			dev_warn(dev, "local reset is deasserted for device\n");
> +			k3_dsp_rproc_reset(kproc);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to add register device with remoteproc core, status = %d\n",
> -- 
> 2.26.0
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[Suman Anna]

Hi Bjorn,

On 5/20/20 7:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
> on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
> rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
> devm_rproc_alloc()").

I realized I also had the R5F patches on my branch, so the third patch 
won't apply cleanly (conflict on Makefile). Let me know if you want a 
new revision posted for you to pick up the series.

regards
Suman

> 
> v2 includes a new remoteproc core patch (patch 1) that adds an OF helper
> for parsing the firmware-name property. This is refactored out to avoid
> replicating the code in various remoteproc drivers. Please see the
> individual patches for detailed changes.
> 
> The main dependent patches from the previous series are now staged in
> rproc-next branch. The only dependency for this series is the common
> ti-sci-proc helper between R5 and DSP drivers [1]. Please see the initial
> cover-letter [2] for v1 details.
> 
> regards
> Suman
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456379/
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11458573/
> 
> Suman Anna (4):
>    remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper
>    dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs
>    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs
>    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs
> 
>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 +++++
>   drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |  13 +
>   drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |   1 +
>   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          |  23 +
>   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   2 +
>   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c     | 773 ++++++++++++++++++
>   6 files changed, 1002 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
>   create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu 21 May 11:59 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> On 5/20/20 7:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
> > on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
> > rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
> > devm_rproc_alloc()").
> 
> I realized I also had the R5F patches on my branch, so the third patch won't
> apply cleanly (conflict on Makefile). Let me know if you want a new revision
> posted for you to pick up the series.
> 

That should be fine, thanks for the heads up!

Will give Mathieu a day or two to take a look as well.

Regards,
Bjorn

> regards
> Suman
> 
> > 
> > v2 includes a new remoteproc core patch (patch 1) that adds an OF helper
> > for parsing the firmware-name property. This is refactored out to avoid
> > replicating the code in various remoteproc drivers. Please see the
> > individual patches for detailed changes.
> > 
> > The main dependent patches from the previous series are now staged in
> > rproc-next branch. The only dependency for this series is the common
> > ti-sci-proc helper between R5 and DSP drivers [1]. Please see the initial
> > cover-letter [2] for v1 details.
> > 
> > regards
> > Suman
> > 
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456379/
> > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11458573/
> > 
> > Suman Anna (4):
> >    remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper
> >    dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs
> >    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs
> >    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs
> > 
> >   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 +++++
> >   drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |  13 +
> >   drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |   1 +
> >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          |  23 +
> >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   2 +
> >   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c     | 773 ++++++++++++++++++
> >   6 files changed, 1002 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> > 
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[Mathieu Poirier]

Gents,

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:01:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 21 May 11:59 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> 
> > Hi Bjorn,
> > 
> > On 5/20/20 7:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
> > > on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
> > > rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
> > > devm_rproc_alloc()").
> > 
> > I realized I also had the R5F patches on my branch, so the third patch won't
> > apply cleanly (conflict on Makefile). Let me know if you want a new revision
> > posted for you to pick up the series.
> > 
> 
> That should be fine, thanks for the heads up!
> 
> Will give Mathieu a day or two to take a look as well.

I don't see having the time to review this set before the middle/end of next
week.  I also understand we are crunched by time if we want to get this in
for the upcoming merge window.

If memory serves me well there wasn't anything controversial about this work.
Under normal circumstances I'd give it a final look but I trust Suman to have
carried out what we agreed on.

Bjorn - if you are happy with this set then go ahead and queue it.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
> > regards
> > Suman
> > 
> > > 
> > > v2 includes a new remoteproc core patch (patch 1) that adds an OF helper
> > > for parsing the firmware-name property. This is refactored out to avoid
> > > replicating the code in various remoteproc drivers. Please see the
> > > individual patches for detailed changes.
> > > 
> > > The main dependent patches from the previous series are now staged in
> > > rproc-next branch. The only dependency for this series is the common
> > > ti-sci-proc helper between R5 and DSP drivers [1]. Please see the initial
> > > cover-letter [2] for v1 details.
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Suman
> > > 
> > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11456379/
> > > [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11458573/
> > > 
> > > Suman Anna (4):
> > >    remoteproc: Introduce rproc_of_parse_firmware() helper
> > >    dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add bindings for C66x DSPs on TI K3 SoCs
> > >    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add a remoteproc driver of K3 C66x DSPs
> > >    remoteproc/k3-dsp: Add support for L2RAM loading on C66x DSPs
> > > 
> > >   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml  | 190 +++++
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig                    |  13 +
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/Makefile                   |   1 +
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c          |  23 +
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h      |   2 +
> > >   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c     | 773 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >   6 files changed, 1002 insertions(+)
> > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml
> > >   create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c
> > > 
> > 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] TI K3 DSP remoteproc driver for C66x DSPs

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Thu 21 May 15:23 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

> Gents,
> 
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 12:01:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 21 May 11:59 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Bjorn,
> > > 
> > > On 5/20/20 7:10 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > 
> > > > The following is v2 of the K3 DSP remoteproc driver supporting the C66x DSPs
> > > > on the TI K3 J721E SoCs. The patches are based on the latest commit on the
> > > > rproc-next branch, 7dcef3988eed ("remoteproc: Fix an error code in
> > > > devm_rproc_alloc()").
> > > 
> > > I realized I also had the R5F patches on my branch, so the third patch won't
> > > apply cleanly (conflict on Makefile). Let me know if you want a new revision
> > > posted for you to pick up the series.
> > > 
> > 
> > That should be fine, thanks for the heads up!
> > 
> > Will give Mathieu a day or two to take a look as well.
> 
> I don't see having the time to review this set before the middle/end of next
> week.  I also understand we are crunched by time if we want to get this in
> for the upcoming merge window.
> 
> If memory serves me well there wasn't anything controversial about this work.
> Under normal circumstances I'd give it a final look but I trust Suman to have
> carried out what we agreed on.
> 
> Bjorn - if you are happy with this set then go ahead and queue it.
> 

Thanks Mathieu.

I looked through the patches again and saw that we're still waiting for
a ack on the dt binding, so I guess I need to hold off on this a little
bit longer.

Regards,
Bjorn