[PATCH v5 00/11] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for attaching to M4

[PATCH v5 00/11] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for attaching to M4

[Mathieu Poirier]

This set applies on top of [1] and refactors the STM32 platform code in
order to attach to the M4 remote processor when it has been started by the
boot loader.

New to V5:
1) Added Bjorn's reviewed-by to patch 06.
2) Removed Loic's reviewed-by from patch 08, it has changed too much.

Patches that need to be reviewed: 7, 8, 9 and 10.

Tested on ST's mp157c development board.

Thanks,
Mathieu

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=314523

Mathieu Poirier (11):
  remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
  remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device
  remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing
  remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing
  remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation
  remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching
  remoteproc: Make function rproc_resource_cleanup() public
  remoteproc: stm32: Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw()
  remoteproc: stm32: Properly handle the resource table when attaching
  remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new attach() operation
  remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop()

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c |   3 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c     | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |   1 +
 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 01/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the memory
ranges since there is no correlation between them.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 062797a447c6..2973ba201c1d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(struct platform_device *pdev,
+					      struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
 {
-	struct device *parent, *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
-	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	struct device *parent, *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np;
 	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mems;
 	struct stm32_rproc_mem_ranges *mem_range;
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
 
-	return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(rproc);
+	return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
 }
 
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 02/11] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device

[Mathieu Poirier]

Request IRQ with platform device rather than remote proc in order to
call stm32_rproc_parse_dt() before rproc_alloc().  That way we can
know whether we need to synchronise with the MCU or not.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 2973ba201c1d..c00f60d42ab6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 
 static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
 {
-	struct rproc *rproc = data;
+	struct platform_device *pdev = data;
+	struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
 	rproc_report_crash(rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
 
@@ -554,7 +555,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	if (irq > 0) {
 		err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, stm32_rproc_wdg, 0,
-				       dev_name(dev), rproc);
+				       dev_name(dev), pdev);
 		if (err) {
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to request wdg irq\n");
 			return err;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 03/11] remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing

[Mathieu Poirier]

Remove the remote processor from the process of parsing the device tree
since (1) there is no correlation between them and (2) to use the
information that was gathered to make a decision on whether to
synchronise with the M4 or not.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index c00f60d42ab6..cbba995a80a2 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -539,12 +539,11 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_syscon(struct device_node *np, const char *prop,
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				struct stm32_rproc *ddata, bool *auto_boot)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
-	struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
 	struct stm32_syscon tz;
 	unsigned int tzen;
 	int err, irq;
@@ -590,7 +589,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	err = regmap_read(tz.map, tz.reg, &tzen);
 	if (err) {
-		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to read tzen\n");
 		return err;
 	}
 	ddata->secured_soc = tzen & tz.mask;
@@ -606,7 +605,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err)
 		dev_info(dev, "failed to get pdds\n");
 
-	rproc->auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
+	*auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
 
 	return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
 }
@@ -627,9 +626,15 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ddata = rproc->priv;
+
 	rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
+
+	ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_rproc;
+
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
-	ddata = rproc->priv;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
@@ -639,13 +644,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
 
-	ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev);
-	if (ret)
-		goto free_wkq;
-
 	ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
 	if (ret)
-		goto free_rproc;
+		goto free_wkq;
 
 	ret = rproc_add(rproc);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 04/11] remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing

[Mathieu Poirier]

Other than one has to be done after the other, there is no correlation
between memory translation and DT parsing.  As such move function
stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations() to stm32_rproc_probe() so that
stm32_rproc_parse_dt() can be extended to look for attach bindings
in a clean way.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index cbba995a80a2..986f34a336a7 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	*auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
 
-	return stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -634,6 +634,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
+	ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_rproc;
+
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 05/11] remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Get from the DT the syncon to probe the state of the remote processor
and the location of the resource table.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 986f34a336a7..961a53f67ec5 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ struct stm32_rproc {
 	struct reset_control *rst;
 	struct stm32_syscon hold_boot;
 	struct stm32_syscon pdds;
+	struct stm32_syscon m4_state;
+	struct stm32_syscon rsctbl;
 	int wdg_irq;
 	u32 nb_rmems;
 	struct stm32_rproc_mem *rmems;
@@ -607,6 +609,30 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	*auto_boot = of_property_read_bool(np, "st,auto-boot");
 
+	/*
+	 * See if we can check the M4 status, i.e if it was started
+	 * from the boot loader or not.
+	 */
+	err = stm32_rproc_get_syscon(np, "st,syscfg-m4-state",
+				     &ddata->m4_state);
+	if (err) {
+		/* remember this */
+		ddata->m4_state.map = NULL;
+		/* no coprocessor state syscon (optional) */
+		dev_warn(dev, "m4 state not supported\n");
+
+		/* no need to go further */
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* See if we can get the resource table */
+	err = stm32_rproc_get_syscon(np, "st,syscfg-rsc-tbl",
+				     &ddata->rsctbl);
+	if (err) {
+		/* no rsc table syscon (optional) */
+		dev_warn(dev, "rsc tbl syscon not supported\n");
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce the required mechanic to set the state of the M4 in order
to properly deal with scenarios where the co-processor has been
started by another entity.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 961a53f67ec5..cbeb5ceb15c5 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
 #define STM32_MBX_VQ1_ID	1
 #define STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN	"shutdown"
 
+#define M4_STATE_OFF		0
+#define M4_STATE_INI		1
+#define M4_STATE_CRUN		2
+#define M4_STATE_CSTOP		3
+#define M4_STATE_STANDBY	4
+#define M4_STATE_CRASH		5
+
 struct stm32_syscon {
 	struct regmap *map;
 	u32 reg;
@@ -636,12 +643,30 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
+				     unsigned int *state)
+{
+	/* See stm32_rproc_parse_dt() */
+	if (!ddata->m4_state.map) {
+		/*
+		 * We couldn't get the coprocessor's state, assume
+		 * it is not running.
+		 */
+		state = M4_STATE_OFF;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
+}
+
+
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct rproc *rproc;
+	unsigned int state;
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
@@ -664,6 +689,13 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
+	ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_rproc;
+
+	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
+		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
+
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 07/11] remoteproc: Make function rproc_resource_cleanup() public

[Mathieu Poirier]

Make function rproc_resource_cleanup() public so that it can be
used by platform drivers when allocating resources to be used by
a detached remote processor.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 3 ++-
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 099c76ab198f..6e0f985e9c9a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1271,7 +1271,7 @@ static void rproc_coredump_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
  * This function will free all resources acquired for @rproc, and it
  * is called whenever @rproc either shuts down or fails to boot.
  */
-static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
+void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct rproc_mem_entry *entry, *tmp;
 	struct rproc_debug_trace *trace, *ttmp;
@@ -1315,6 +1315,7 @@ static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	rproc_coredump_cleanup(rproc);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_resource_cleanup);
 
 static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index cf5e31556780..7c0567029f7c 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc);
 int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc);
 void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc);
+void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc);
 
 struct rproc *devm_rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 			       const struct rproc_ops *ops,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 08/11] remoteproc: stm32: Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw() in two parts, the first one
to parse the memory regions and the second one to load the
resource table.  That way parsing of the memory regions can be
re-used when attaching to the remote processor.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index cbeb5ceb15c5..9ab58fae252f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
+static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
@@ -266,6 +266,16 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 		index++;
 	}
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+	int ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	return stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
 }
 
@@ -693,15 +703,20 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_rproc;
 
-	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
+	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN) {
 		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
 
+		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
+		if (ret)
+			goto free_resources;
+	}
+
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
 	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
 	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
 		dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto free_rproc;
+		goto free_resources;
 	}
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
@@ -720,6 +735,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
 free_wkq:
 	destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
+free_resources:
+	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
 free_rproc:
 	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 		dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 09/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly handle the resource table when attaching

[Mathieu Poirier]

Properly set the remote processor's resource table based on where it was
loaded by the external entity when attaching to a remote processor.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 9ab58fae252f..882229f3b1c9 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
 #define STM32_MBX_VQ1_ID	1
 #define STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN	"shutdown"
 
+#define RSC_TBL_SIZE		1024
+
 #define M4_STATE_OFF		0
 #define M4_STATE_INI		1
 #define M4_STATE_CRUN		2
@@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ struct stm32_rproc {
 	struct stm32_mbox mb[MBOX_NB_MBX];
 	struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
 	bool secured_soc;
+	void __iomem *rsc_va;
 };
 
 static int stm32_rproc_pa_to_da(struct rproc *rproc, phys_addr_t pa, u64 *da)
@@ -669,6 +672,74 @@ static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
 	return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
+				u64 da, phys_addr_t *pa)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct stm32_rproc_mem *p_mem;
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ddata->nb_rmems; i++) {
+		p_mem = &ddata->rmems[i];
+
+		if (da < p_mem->dev_addr ||
+		    da >= p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->size)
+			continue;
+
+		*pa = da - p_mem->dev_addr + p_mem->bus_addr;
+		dev_dbg(dev, "da %llx to pa %#x\n", da, *pa);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	dev_err(dev, "can't translate da %llx\n", da);
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct platform_device *pdev,
+					    struct rproc *rproc,
+					    struct stm32_rproc *ddata)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	phys_addr_t rsc_pa;
+	u32 rsc_da;
+	int err;
+
+	err = regmap_read(ddata->rsctbl.map, ddata->rsctbl.reg, &rsc_da);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err(dev, "failed to read rsc tbl addr\n");
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	if (!rsc_da)
+		/* no rsc table */
+		return 0;
+
+	err = stm32_rproc_da_to_pa(pdev, ddata, rsc_da, &rsc_pa);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	ddata->rsc_va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ddata->rsc_va)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %pa+%zx\n",
+			&rsc_pa, RSC_TBL_SIZE);
+		ddata->rsc_va = NULL;
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The resource table is already loaded in device memory, no need
+	 * to work with a cached table.
+	 */
+	rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+	/* Assuming the resource table fits in 1kB is fair */
+	rproc->table_sz = RSC_TBL_SIZE;
+	rproc->table_ptr = (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
@@ -709,6 +780,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
 		if (ret)
 			goto free_resources;
+
+		ret = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(pdev, rproc, ddata);
+		if (ret)
+			goto free_resources;
 	}
 
 	rproc->has_iommu = false;
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 10/11] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new attach() operation

[Mathieu Poirier]

Introduce new attach function to be used when attaching to a
remote processor.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 882229f3b1c9..7145cd49616e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -460,6 +460,13 @@ static int stm32_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true);
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	stm32_rproc_add_coredump_trace(rproc);
+
+	return stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true);
+}
+
 static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
@@ -525,6 +532,7 @@ static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
 static struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.start		= stm32_rproc_start,
 	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
+	.attach		= stm32_rproc_attach,
 	.kick		= stm32_rproc_kick,
 	.load		= rproc_elf_load_segments,
 	.parse_fw	= stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v5 11/11] remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop()

[Mathieu Poirier]

Update the co-processor state in function stm32_rproc_stop() so that
it can be used in scenarios where the remoteproc core is attaching
to the M4.

Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index 7145cd49616e..f4da42fc0eeb 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -504,6 +504,18 @@ static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
 		}
 	}
 
+	/* update coprocessor state to OFF if available */
+	if (ddata->m4_state.map) {
+		err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->m4_state.map,
+					 ddata->m4_state.reg,
+					 ddata->m4_state.mask,
+					 M4_STATE_OFF);
+		if (err) {
+			dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set copro state\n");
+			return err;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

Hi Mathieu,

On 7/7/20 11:31 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Introduce the required mechanic to set the state of the M4 in order
> to properly deal with scenarios where the co-processor has been
> started by another entity.
> 
> Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].
> 
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 961a53f67ec5..cbeb5ceb15c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@
>  #define STM32_MBX_VQ1_ID	1
>  #define STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN	"shutdown"
>  
> +#define M4_STATE_OFF		0
> +#define M4_STATE_INI		1
> +#define M4_STATE_CRUN		2
> +#define M4_STATE_CSTOP		3
> +#define M4_STATE_STANDBY	4
> +#define M4_STATE_CRASH		5
> +
>  struct stm32_syscon {
>  	struct regmap *map;
>  	u32 reg;
> @@ -636,12 +643,30 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(struct stm32_rproc *ddata,
> +				     unsigned int *state)
> +{
> +	/* See stm32_rproc_parse_dt() */
> +	if (!ddata->m4_state.map) {
> +		/*
> +		 * We couldn't get the coprocessor's state, assume
> +		 * it is not running.
> +		 */
> +		state = M4_STATE_OFF;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return regmap_read(ddata->m4_state.map, ddata->m4_state.reg, state);
> +}
> +
> +
nitpicking:  multiple blank lines here

>  static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	unsigned int state;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> @@ -664,6 +689,13 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto free_rproc;
>  
> +	ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto free_rproc;
> +
> +	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
> +		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
> +
>  	rproc->has_iommu = false;
>  	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
>  	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] remoteproc: stm32: Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw()

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

On 7/7/20 11:31 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw() in two parts, the first one
> to parse the memory regions and the second one to load the
> resource table.  That way parsing of the memory regions can be
> re-used when attaching to the remote processor.
> 
> Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].
> 
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index cbeb5ceb15c5..9ab58fae252f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +static int stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
>  	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> @@ -266,6 +266,16 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  		index++;
>  	}
>  
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +	int ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	return stm32_rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>  }
>  
> @@ -693,15 +703,20 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto free_rproc;
>  
> -	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
> +	if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN) {
>  		rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>  
> +		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto free_resources;
> +	}
> +
Here you do more than the split, you add the memory registration in the probe
i think updating the commit title and message should be sufficient

>  	rproc->has_iommu = false;
>  	ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
>  	if (!ddata->workqueue) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> -		goto free_rproc;
> +		goto free_resources;
>  	}
>  
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
> @@ -720,6 +735,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>  free_wkq:
>  	destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
> +free_resources:
> +	rproc_resource_cleanup(rproc);
>  free_rproc:
>  	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
>  		dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> 

Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] remoteproc: stm32: Add support for attaching to M4

[Arnaud POULIQUEN]

On 7/7/20 11:31 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This set applies on top of [1] and refactors the STM32 platform code in
> order to attach to the M4 remote processor when it has been started by the
> boot loader.
> 
> New to V5:
> 1) Added Bjorn's reviewed-by to patch 06.
> 2) Removed Loic's reviewed-by from patch 08, it has changed too much.
> 
> Patches that need to be reviewed: 7, 8, 9 and 10.
> 
> Tested on ST's mp157c development board.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=314523
> 
> Mathieu Poirier (11):
>   remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from memory translation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform device
>   remoteproc: stm32: Decouple rproc from DT parsing
>   remoteproc: stm32: Remove memory translation from DT parsing
>   remoteproc: stm32: Parse syscon that will manage M4 synchronisation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching
>   remoteproc: Make function rproc_resource_cleanup() public
>   remoteproc: stm32: Split function stm32_rproc_parse_fw()
>   remoteproc: stm32: Properly handle the resource table when attaching
>   remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new attach() operation
>   remoteproc: stm32: Update M4 state in stm32_rproc_stop()
> 
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c |   3 +-
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c     | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 

I tested the series with the [1] 
Minor remarks on patch 6 & 8. After fixing them, for the series:

Acked-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>

Thank you very much for your work on this feature.

Arnaud

Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching

[kernel test robot]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3607 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.8-rc5 next-20200714]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-stm32-Add-support-for-attaching-to-M4/20200708-053515
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 9ebcfadb0610322ac537dd7aa5d9cbc2b2894c68
config: arm-randconfig-r011-20200714 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 02946de3802d3bc65bc9f2eb9b8d4969b5a7add8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:697:18: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RPROC_DETACHED'
                   rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
                                  ^
   1 error generated.

vim +/RPROC_DETACHED +697 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c

   661	
   662	
   663	static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
   664	{
   665		struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
   666		struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
   667		struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
   668		struct rproc *rproc;
   669		unsigned int state;
   670		int ret;
   671	
   672		ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
   673		if (ret)
   674			return ret;
   675	
   676		rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
   677		if (!rproc)
   678			return -ENOMEM;
   679	
   680		ddata = rproc->priv;
   681	
   682		rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
   683	
   684		ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
   685		if (ret)
   686			goto free_rproc;
   687	
   688		ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
   689		if (ret)
   690			goto free_rproc;
   691	
   692		ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
   693		if (ret)
   694			goto free_rproc;
   695	
   696		if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
 > 697			rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
   698	
   699		rproc->has_iommu = false;
   700		ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
   701		if (!ddata->workqueue) {
   702			dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
   703			ret = -ENOMEM;
   704			goto free_rproc;
   705		}
   706	
   707		platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
   708	
   709		ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
   710		if (ret)
   711			goto free_wkq;
   712	
   713		ret = rproc_add(rproc);
   714		if (ret)
   715			goto free_mb;
   716	
   717		return 0;
   718	
   719	free_mb:
   720		stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
   721	free_wkq:
   722		destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
   723	free_rproc:
   724		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
   725			dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
   726			device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
   727		}
   728		rproc_free(rproc);
   729		return ret;
   730	}
   731	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 32633 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching

[Mathieu Poirier]

Hi Robot,

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 14:31, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.8-rc5 next-20200714]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-stm32-Add-support-for-attaching-to-M4/20200708-053515
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 9ebcfadb0610322ac537dd7aa5d9cbc2b2894c68
> config: arm-randconfig-r011-20200714 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 02946de3802d3bc65bc9f2eb9b8d4969b5a7add8)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
>         # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:697:18: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RPROC_DETACHED'
>                    rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>                                   ^
>    1 error generated.

This patchset depends on this one [1], something that is clearly
stated in the cover letter.  Compiling this set on top of [1]
generates no error.

[1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=318275

>
> vim +/RPROC_DETACHED +697 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>
>    661
>    662
>    663  static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>    664  {
>    665          struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>    666          struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
>    667          struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>    668          struct rproc *rproc;
>    669          unsigned int state;
>    670          int ret;
>    671
>    672          ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>    673          if (ret)
>    674                  return ret;
>    675
>    676          rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
>    677          if (!rproc)
>    678                  return -ENOMEM;
>    679
>    680          ddata = rproc->priv;
>    681
>    682          rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
>    683
>    684          ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
>    685          if (ret)
>    686                  goto free_rproc;
>    687
>    688          ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
>    689          if (ret)
>    690                  goto free_rproc;
>    691
>    692          ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
>    693          if (ret)
>    694                  goto free_rproc;
>    695
>    696          if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
>  > 697                  rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>    698
>    699          rproc->has_iommu = false;
>    700          ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
>    701          if (!ddata->workqueue) {
>    702                  dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
>    703                  ret = -ENOMEM;
>    704                  goto free_rproc;
>    705          }
>    706
>    707          platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>    708
>    709          ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
>    710          if (ret)
>    711                  goto free_wkq;
>    712
>    713          ret = rproc_add(rproc);
>    714          if (ret)
>    715                  goto free_mb;
>    716
>    717          return 0;
>    718
>    719  free_mb:
>    720          stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>    721  free_wkq:
>    722          destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
>    723  free_rproc:
>    724          if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
>    725                  dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
>    726                  device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
>    727          }
>    728          rproc_free(rproc);
>    729          return ret;
>    730  }
>    731
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v5 06/11] remoteproc: stm32: Properly set co-processor state when attaching

[Rong Chen]

On 7/16/20 6:19 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Hi Robot,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 14:31, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mathieu,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.8-rc5 next-20200714]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use  as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mathieu-Poirier/remoteproc-stm32-Add-support-for-attaching-to-M4/20200708-053515
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 9ebcfadb0610322ac537dd7aa5d9cbc2b2894c68
>> config: arm-randconfig-r011-20200714 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: clang version 11.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 02946de3802d3bc65bc9f2eb9b8d4969b5a7add8)
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>          wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # install arm cross compiling tool for clang build
>>          # apt-get install binutils-arm-linux-gnueabi
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c:697:18: error: use of undeclared identifier 'RPROC_DETACHED'
>>                     rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>>                                    ^
>>     1 error generated.
> This patchset depends on this one [1], something that is clearly
> stated in the cover letter.  Compiling this set on top of [1]
> generates no error.
>
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=318275

Hi Mathieu,

Thanks for the feedback, the bot can't parse the base which links to another patchset,
and we can get the base commit if using 'git format-patch --base' to submit patch.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

>
>> vim +/RPROC_DETACHED +697 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
>>
>>     661
>>     662
>>     663  static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>     664  {
>>     665          struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>     666          struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
>>     667          struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>>     668          struct rproc *rproc;
>>     669          unsigned int state;
>>     670          int ret;
>>     671
>>     672          ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>     673          if (ret)
>>     674                  return ret;
>>     675
>>     676          rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
>>     677          if (!rproc)
>>     678                  return -ENOMEM;
>>     679
>>     680          ddata = rproc->priv;
>>     681
>>     682          rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
>>     683
>>     684          ret = stm32_rproc_parse_dt(pdev, ddata, &rproc->auto_boot);
>>     685          if (ret)
>>     686                  goto free_rproc;
>>     687
>>     688          ret = stm32_rproc_of_memory_translations(pdev, ddata);
>>     689          if (ret)
>>     690                  goto free_rproc;
>>     691
>>     692          ret = stm32_rproc_get_m4_status(ddata, &state);
>>     693          if (ret)
>>     694                  goto free_rproc;
>>     695
>>     696          if (state == M4_STATE_CRUN)
>>   > 697                  rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
>>     698
>>     699          rproc->has_iommu = false;
>>     700          ddata->workqueue = create_workqueue(dev_name(dev));
>>     701          if (!ddata->workqueue) {
>>     702                  dev_err(dev, "cannot create workqueue\n");
>>     703                  ret = -ENOMEM;
>>     704                  goto free_rproc;
>>     705          }
>>     706
>>     707          platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>>     708
>>     709          ret = stm32_rproc_request_mbox(rproc);
>>     710          if (ret)
>>     711                  goto free_wkq;
>>     712
>>     713          ret = rproc_add(rproc);
>>     714          if (ret)
>>     715                  goto free_mb;
>>     716
>>     717          return 0;
>>     718
>>     719  free_mb:
>>     720          stm32_rproc_free_mbox(rproc);
>>     721  free_wkq:
>>     722          destroy_workqueue(ddata->workqueue);
>>     723  free_rproc:
>>     724          if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
>>     725                  dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
>>     726                  device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
>>     727          }
>>     728          rproc_free(rproc);
>>     729          return ret;
>>     730  }
>>     731
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@lists.01.org