From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1346AC433E0 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 14:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38BF619E5 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 14:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230224AbhC0OdR (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:33:17 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:33532 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230294AbhC0Oc5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 10:32:57 -0400 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12REWp1Z023425; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:32:51 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1616855571; bh=kfa+qJtpUE8uUuJRX4nhjzBA6ZEZ4RD2emwsS8UwswI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date; b=JFBPR62x3X6m/r3zHlAzXHNBQMC1tu+eMpRWgAfWo32wsLLVhPpmt1ggni1R18KT0 wTur71Aq+nogDrvEyg/JiyxQvwJ6sg3EHKa9DHR04tlqf/mR5Dfmk7uq3zIUHmObxY GcyBZQzGC7ZlH1bKsFMAtsIZVfNMMsj9w5MudY+c= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 12REWpUA038074 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:32:51 -0500 Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:31:30 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:31:29 -0500 Received: from fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com [10.247.120.73]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12REVTW7034885; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:31:29 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.250.33.213]) by fllv0103.dal.design.ti.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 12REVTAQ038804; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:31:29 -0500 From: Suman Anna To: Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring CC: Lokesh Vutla , , , , , Suman Anna Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] TI K3 R5F remoteproc support on AM64x SoCs Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:31:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20210327143117.1840-1-s-anna@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Hi All, The following series is a minor revision of the K3 R5F remoteproc AM64x support series [1] addressing one review comment from Mathieu. Please see the v1 cover-letter for details about the revised R5F IP in TI AM64x SoCs. Only change is in Patch 2, binding patch is unchanged from v1. Also, corrected the AM46x typo in the cover-letter title :) regards Suman [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/cover/20210318215842.8196-1-s-anna@ti.com/ Suman Anna (2): dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Update bindings for AM64x SoCs remoteproc: k3-r5: Extend support to R5F clusters on AM64x SoCs .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml | 31 +++- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 149 ++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) -- 2.30.1