Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP

[Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:28:00PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> > i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP
> > 
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 19:01, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mathieu,
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support
> > > > i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:20:14AM +0800, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > V5:
> > > > >  Add R-b tag
> > > > >  Move the change in detect mode of patch 5 to patch 7 Per
> > > > > Mathieu's comments
> > > > >
> > > > > V4:
> > > > >  Typo fix
> > > > >  patch 4: take state as a check condition  patch 5: move regmap
> > > > > lookup/attach to imx_rproc_detect_mode  patch 6: add
> > > > > imx_rproc_clk_enable for optional clk  patch 8: use switch/case in
> > > > > imx_rproc_detect_mode
> > > > > V3:
> > > > >  Add A-b tag for Patch 1/2
> > > > >  Fix the checkpatch warning for Patch 6,8
> > > > >
> > > > > V2:
> > > > >  Patch 1/8, use fsl as vendor, typo fix  Because patchset [1] has
> > > > > v2 version, patch 5,6,7,8 are adapted that  change.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset is to support i.MX7ULP/8MN/8MP, also includes a
> > > > > patch to parse fsl,auto-boot
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > One of the request I had from the last revision was to explicitly
> > > > list what other patchset this work depends on and what branch it is
> > > > based of, something I can't find here.
> > >
> > > Sorry, that patchset has been merged, so I remove that line.
> > > I should mention that that patchset has been merged into Linux-next tree.
> > >
> > 
> > And what branch this set should be applied to is missing.
> 
> I take latest linux-next/master for my upstream new feature work.
> 
> > 
> > > >
> > > > As such I am dropping this set and won't look at another revision
> > > > before May 22nd.
> > >
> > > Ah. Is it just because that the dependency patchset not been mentioned
> > > or you have issue applying the patchset that delay the patchset for one
> > month?
> > >
> > 
> > Both.
> 
> I replay my flow:
> git fetch linux-next
> git checkout linux-next/master -b master-next-4-24-2021
> pwclient list -w "Peng Fan (OSS)" -s New | grep V5 | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -I {} pwclient git-am {}
> 
> It could successfully apply the patchset.
> Applying patch #12215291 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,1/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add fsl,auto-boot property
> Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add fsl,auto-boot property
> Applying patch #12215293 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,2/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP support
> Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP support
> Applying patch #12215295 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,3/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> Applying: dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> Applying patch #12215297 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,4/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot
> Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot
> Applying patch #12215299 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,5/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for mutilple start/stop method
> Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for mutilple start/stop method
> Applying patch #12215301 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,6/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
> Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
> Applying patch #12215303 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,7/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP
> Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP
> Applying patch #12215305 using 'git am'
> Description: [V5,8/8] remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> Applying: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> 
> 
> If anything wrong my work flow conflicts with Linux remoteproc subsystem upstream flow,
> please correct me, and I'll follow.
> 
> Thanks for your time and patience on reviewing my patches. Sorry for the inconvince
> that I bring in.
> 
> Anyway please share me your flow to apply patches, I will try to avoid unhappy things
> in following patches. 
>

All I asked is that you list the branch your work is based on _and_ any
dependencies, something you did not do.

I review hundreds of patchsets every year and knowing exactly how to work with a
series goes a long way in saving precious time, time that can be used to
review other people's submissions.

I am not angry at you but at the same time I can't review your patches if you
are not ready to help me do so.
 
> Thanks,
> Peng.
> 
> > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Peng.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Peng Fan (8):
> > > > >   dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add fsl,auto-boot property
> > > > >   dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX7ULP support
> > > > >   dt-bindings: remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > > > >   remoteproc: imx_rproc: parse fsl,auto-boot
> > > > >   remoteproc: imx_rproc: initial support for mutilple start/stop method
> > > > >   remoteproc: imx_rproc: make clk optional
> > > > >   remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX7ULP
> > > > >   remoteproc: imx_rproc: support i.MX8MN/P
> > > > >
> > > > >  .../bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc.yaml    |  11 +-
> > > > >  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c                | 196
> > > > +++++++++++++++---
> > > > >  2 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.30.0
> > > > >