From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
"bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
"ohad@wizery.com" <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 08/13] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 02:15:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB27602C9085027346DE35F3A788020@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200826164529.224476-9-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 08/13] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate()
>
> Align what was done for rproc_detach() by renaming function rproc_actuate().
> That way it is easier to figure out the opposite of each functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index f3943a1e2754..c4b80ce6f22d 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ static int rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc, const
> struct firmware *fw)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> +static int __rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const
> struct firmware *fw)
> * Attach to remote processor - similar to rproc_fw_boot() but without
> * the steps that deal with the firmware image.
> */
> -static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
> +static int rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> int ret;
> @@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ static int rproc_actuate(struct rproc *rproc)
> goto clean_up_resources;
> }
>
> - ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
> + ret = __rproc_attach(rproc);
> if (ret)
> goto clean_up_resources;
>
> @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
> if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED) {
> dev_info(dev, "attaching to %s\n", rproc->name);
>
> - ret = rproc_actuate(rproc);
> + ret = rproc_attach(rproc);
> } else {
> dev_info(dev, "powering up %s\n", rproc->name);
>
> @@ -1893,7 +1893,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
> *
> * @rproc: the remote processor
> *
> - * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_actuate()).
> + * Detach a remote processor (previously attached to with rproc_attach()).
> *
> * In case @rproc is still being used by an additional user(s), then
> * this function will just decrement the power refcount and exit,
> --
Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-15 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-26 16:45 [PATCH 00/13] remoteproc: Add support for detaching from rproc Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] remoteproc: Re-check state in rproc_shutdown() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:28 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 02/13] remoteproc: Remove useless check in rproc_del() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:29 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 03/13] remoteproc: Add new RPROC_ATTACHED state Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:31 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 04/13] remoteproc: Properly represent the attached state Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:33 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 05/13] remoteproc: Add new detach() remoteproc operation Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:37 ` Peng Fan
2020-10-22 21:51 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 06/13] remoteproc: Introduce function __rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:39 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 07/13] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_detach() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 1:52 ` Peng Fan
2020-10-22 21:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 08/13] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_actuate() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:15 ` Peng Fan [this message]
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 09/13] remoteproc: Add return value to function rproc_shutdown() Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:21 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 10/13] remoteproc: Properly deal with a stop request when attached Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:29 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 11/13] remoteproc: Properly deal with detach request Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:30 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 12/13] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:31 ` Peng Fan
2020-08-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 13/13] remoteproc: Properly deal with a kernel panic when attached Mathieu Poirier
2020-10-15 2:28 ` Peng Fan
2020-09-01 16:55 ` [PATCH 00/13] remoteproc: Add support for detaching from rproc Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-09-01 18:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB6PR0402MB27602C9085027346DE35F3A788020@DB6PR0402MB2760.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).