From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602E3C433E2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F182068F for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=fpond.eu header.i=@fpond.eu header.b="jPOJ22fJ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728571AbgGMJFA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:05:00 -0400 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([85.215.255.21]:12393 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbgGMJFA (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 05:05:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1594631095; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=fpond.eu; h=Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:To:From:Date: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=XJcRgXwIN4Zhf0ACGBnz0pccsMgYq+8GhJZN/ONtY4k=; b=jPOJ22fJ8JgE/pTenBS3wd2vAjsMAFDKcFq0rRdEnsNlVUHFcEF+tHOydWG6yfYwby Larm6sK4NdWdskru5bXQuXO8Ielx86NYosI1JJftCC2ELpQFegEqIVgZaby+CxBzXA8n WIabfEbx0iUoZjqwBB4t+IgVxMPaeBf2RuUd7MXv0+FXaLOm3qS7akbwd+fu40kvI+eZ BxYWyOsAhF06M7U1L2611KAIspKPuJTEJbbXK80SK3X7Zx4yWv0cx5cvlXV7QSdg08hw 4PcTJiOvE2/V27rYkS+ulkKQPvhyC2fNQ1UYFUvNjPQ6CISyuW8eyJ2jhYpAM+fRe5Lf iaOQ== X-RZG-AUTH: ":OWANVUa4dPFUgKR/3dpvnYP0Np73amq+g13rqGzvv3qxio1R8fGk/2mpg+g=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from oxapp03-03.back.ox.d0m.de by smtp-ox.front (RZmta 46.10.5 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id c08c89w6D94t5B3 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve X9_62_prime256v1 with 256 ECDH bits, eq. 3072 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:04:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:04:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Hecht To: =?UTF-8?Q?Niklas_S=C3=B6derlund?= , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Linux-Renesas , Ulrich Hecht Message-ID: <1915095320.397253.1594631095168@webmail.strato.com> In-Reply-To: <20200713081526.GK1498036@oden.dyn.berto.se> References: <20200704155856.3037010-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> <20200704155856.3037010-2-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> <20200713072455.GJ1498036@oden.dyn.berto.se> <20200713081526.GK1498036@oden.dyn.berto.se> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: gose: Fix ports node name for adv7180 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.2-Rev29 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > On July 13, 2020 10:15 AM Niklas S=C3=B6derlund wrote: > The difference as far as I can tell is only in the bindings. The older=20 > 'adi,adv7180' compatibility string only describes where the adv7180 is=20 > transmitting the data it collects from an undescribed connector. While=20 > the more recent compat string 'adi,adv7180cp' describes both the=20 > destination and the connector. A good example as you point out is to=20 > compare koelsch with gose. From a V4L2 point of view the connector being= =20 > described does not effect the capture operation. >=20 > Ulrich maybe you can help us shed some light on this as you added the=20 > new compat strings? Executive summary: "[Laurent and Hans] agreed that DT should model physical= ports." Full details: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg1= 03799.html The reason why it's only in Gose is that that was the patch series that rai= sed the issue, and we didn't update the existing implementations. CU Uli