From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:56192 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750916AbeDXQIV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:08:21 -0400
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 17:08:39 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 37/61] perf: simplify getting .drvdata
Message-ID: <20180424160839.GD25964@arm.com>
References: <20180419140641.27926-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
 <20180419140641.27926-38-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180419140641.27926-38-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:06:07PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> We should get drvdata from struct device directly. Going via
> platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> 
> Build tested only. buildbot is happy. Please apply individually.

Thanks, Wolfram. I'll pick this up via the arm perf tree.

Will