[PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Fix MOD_SEL bit numbering

* [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a77995: Fix MOD_SEL bit numbering
@ 2019-01-11 11:50 Geert Uytterhoeven
  2019-01-11 14:12 ` Simon Horman
  2019-01-21 12:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-01-11 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij, Yoshihiro Shimoda
  Cc: linux-renesas-soc, linux-gpio, Takeshi Kihara, Geert Uytterhoeven

From: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@renesas.com>

MOD_SEL register bit numbering was different from R-Car D3 SoC and
R-Car H3/M3-[WN] SoCs.

MOD_SEL 1-bit      H3/M3-[WN]  D3
===============    ==========  =====
Set Value = H'0    b'0         b'0
Set Value = H'1    b'1         b'1

MOD_SEL 2-bits     H3/M3-[WN]  D3
===============    ==========  =====
Set Value = H'0    b'00        b'00
Set Value = H'1    b'01        b'10
Set Value = H'2    b'10        b'01
Set Value = H'3    b'11        b'11

MOD_SEL 3-bits     H3/M3-[WN]  D3
===============    ==========  =====
Set Value = H'0    b'000       b'000
Set Value = H'1    b'001       b'100
Set Value = H'2    b'010       b'010
Set Value = H'3    b'011       b'110
Set Value = H'4    b'100       b'001
Set Value = H'5    b'101       b'101
Set Value = H'6    b'110       b'011
Set Value = H'7    b'111       b'111

This patch replaces the #define name and value of MOD_SEL.

Signed-off-by: Takeshi Kihara <takeshi.kihara.df@renesas.com>
Fixes: 794a67117646 ("pinctrl: sh-pfc: Initial R8A77995 PFC support")
[shimoda: split a patch per SoC and revise the commit log]
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
[geert: Use a macro to do the actual reordering]
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
Untested as we don't know how to test the impact of MOD_SEL bits on
output pins.

Using a macro makes the code easier to write, read, and maintain.
Use "git show --color-words" to see the difference.

I'd love to handle the reversal in the PINMUX_CFG_REG_VAR()
descriptions, but I can't use e.g. REV4(MOD_SEL0_24_23) there, as
MOD_SEL0_24_23 is a single parameter, not 4 parameters.

Can this be improved?
---
 drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c
index 84d78db381e30249..9e377e3b9cb3c20c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r8a77995.c
@@ -381,6 +381,9 @@ FM(IP12_23_20)	IP12_23_20 \
 FM(IP12_27_24)	IP12_27_24 \
 FM(IP12_31_28)	IP12_31_28 \
 
+/* The bit numbering in MOD_SEL fields is reversed */
+#define REV4(f0, f1, f2, f3)			f0 f2 f1 f3
+
 /* MOD_SEL0 */			/* 0 */			/* 1 */			/* 2 */			/* 3 */
 #define MOD_SEL0_30		FM(SEL_MSIOF2_0)	FM(SEL_MSIOF2_1)
 #define MOD_SEL0_29		FM(SEL_I2C3_0)		FM(SEL_I2C3_1)
@@ -388,10 +391,10 @@ FM(IP12_31_28)	IP12_31_28 \
 #define MOD_SEL0_27		FM(SEL_MSIOF3_0)	FM(SEL_MSIOF3_1)
 #define MOD_SEL0_26		FM(SEL_HSCIF3_0)	FM(SEL_HSCIF3_1)
 #define MOD_SEL0_25		FM(SEL_SCIF4_0)		FM(SEL_SCIF4_1)
-#define MOD_SEL0_24_23		FM(SEL_PWM0_0)		FM(SEL_PWM0_1)		FM(SEL_PWM0_2)		F_(0, 0)
-#define MOD_SEL0_22_21		FM(SEL_PWM1_0)		FM(SEL_PWM1_1)		FM(SEL_PWM1_2)		F_(0, 0)
-#define MOD_SEL0_20_19		FM(SEL_PWM2_0)		FM(SEL_PWM2_1)		FM(SEL_PWM2_2)		F_(0, 0)
-#define MOD_SEL0_18_17		FM(SEL_PWM3_0)		FM(SEL_PWM3_1)		FM(SEL_PWM3_2)		F_(0, 0)
+#define MOD_SEL0_24_23	   REV4(FM(SEL_PWM0_0),		FM(SEL_PWM0_1),		FM(SEL_PWM0_2),		F_(0, 0))
+#define MOD_SEL0_22_21	   REV4(FM(SEL_PWM1_0),		FM(SEL_PWM1_1),		FM(SEL_PWM1_2),		F_(0, 0))
+#define MOD_SEL0_20_19	   REV4(FM(SEL_PWM2_0),		FM(SEL_PWM2_1),		FM(SEL_PWM2_2),		F_(0, 0))
+#define MOD_SEL0_18_17	   REV4(FM(SEL_PWM3_0),		FM(SEL_PWM3_1),		FM(SEL_PWM3_2),		F_(0, 0))
 #define MOD_SEL0_15		FM(SEL_IRQ_0_0)		FM(SEL_IRQ_0_1)
 #define MOD_SEL0_14		FM(SEL_IRQ_1_0)		FM(SEL_IRQ_1_1)
 #define MOD_SEL0_13		FM(SEL_IRQ_2_0)		FM(SEL_IRQ_2_1)
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread