On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 02:43:59PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> Mason had submitted a new verison a couple of weeks ago and there'd been
> no replies on the new version so I'd thought that all the prior issues
> had been addressed.  I guess that's not the case?  The thread on the
> version before was a bit long but seemed to peter out, though looking at
> the archives it seems the main issue was that Mason stopped replying.

Following some IRC discussion with Marek and Sergei I've dropped these
for now.  The interaction with the HyperFlash support seems unclear
still and might be a bit more than a simple refactoring, worst case
it'll be binding incompatible though hopefully not.  Mason, if you could
work with them to figure out the MFD that'll be needed the driver looks
fine from a SPI subsystem point of view.

Sorry about the confusion for everyone here.