linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:47:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318154759.21978-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> (raw)

When working with this driver while debugging something else, I noticed that
there are no in-kernel users of platform_data anymore. Removing the support
simplifies the code and gets rid of quite some lines. The biggest refactoring
went to the regulator driver which could maybe benefit from more
refactorization. However, there is no in-kernel user of that driver, so no
testing. I left it at this stage. I think the changes are still at a level
where review and build-testing will give enough confidence.

Besides the regulator thing, it was tested on a Renesas Lager board (R-Car H2).
No regressions encountered. buildbot was happy, too.

The patches are based on v5.1-rc1. I'd vote for all of them going through the
MFD tree. Looking forward to comments!

   Wolfram


Wolfram Sang (6):
  regulator: da9063: remove platform_data support
  input: da9063_onkey: remove platform_data support
  mfd: da9063: remove platform_data support
  regulator: da9063: move definitions out of a header into the driver
  mfd: da9063: remove leftover platform_data definitions
  regulator: da9063: platform_data is gone, depend on OF

 drivers/input/misc/da9063_onkey.c    |  11 +---
 drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c            |  20 +-----
 drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c             |   1 -
 drivers/mfd/da9063-irq.c             |   1 -
 drivers/regulator/Kconfig            |   2 +-
 drivers/regulator/da9063-regulator.c |  61 +++++++++++++------
 include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h     | 114 -----------------------------------
 7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h

-- 
2.11.0


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-18 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-18 15:47 Wolfram Sang [this message]
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] regulator: da9063: remove platform_data support Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:49   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 10:57   ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] input: da9063_onkey: " Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:49   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 10:58   ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-03  9:24     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] mfd: da9063: " Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:25   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-25 20:22     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:49   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 10:58   ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-03  8:02   ` Lee Jones
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] regulator: da9063: move definitions out of a header into the driver Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:49   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-19 13:01   ` Mark Brown
2019-04-03  9:22     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-03 10:07       ` Mark Brown
2019-03-29 11:00   ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] mfd: da9063: remove leftover platform_data definitions Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:49   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 11:00   ` Steve Twiss
2019-04-03  8:07   ` Lee Jones
2019-04-03  8:50     ` Wolfram Sang
2019-04-03  9:03       ` Lee Jones
2019-03-18 15:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] regulator: da9063: platform_data is gone, depend on OF Wolfram Sang
2019-03-19 12:50   ` Simon Horman
2019-03-29 11:01   ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-18 16:34 ` [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data Steve Twiss
2019-03-29 11:02 ` Steve Twiss
2019-03-29 11:27   ` Wolfram Sang
2019-03-29 11:28   ` Steve Twiss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190318154759.21978-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).