Re: [PATCH 03/20] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Update 'vsps' in example

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Geert,

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 10:00:23PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:50 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:22:03PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> Update the 'vsps' property structure in the documentation example to
> >> reflect what's actually implemented in the device tree sources.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> 
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.txt
> >> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Example: R8A7795 (R-Car H3) ES2.0 DU
> >>                        <&cpg CPG_MOD 722>,
> >>                        <&cpg CPG_MOD 721>;
> >>               clock-names = "du.0", "du.1", "du.2", "du.3";
> >> -             vsps = <&vspd0 0>, <&vspd1 0>, <&vspd2 0>, <&vspd0 1>;
> >> +             vsps = <&vspd0 0 &vspd1 0 &vspd2  &vspd0 1>;
> >
> > The former is simpler to read than the latter in my opinion. Shouldn't
> > we update the .dtsi files instead ?
> 
> Yes, it is easier to read (for humans).
> 
> >>               cmms = <&cmm0 &cmm1 &cmm2 &cmm3>;
> 
> Perhaps we want grouping here, too?

As there's a single entry per CMM it matters less in my opinion. I'm
fine with either options.

> 
> >>
> >>               ports {

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart