From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
geert@linux-m68k.org, horms@verge.net.au, uli+renesas@fpond.eu,
VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com, airlied@linux.ie,
daniel@ffwll.ch, koji.matsuoka.xm@renesas.com, muroya@ksk.co.jp,
Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@in.bosch.com,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] drm: rcar-du: crtc: Enable and disable CMMs
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 02:23:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190918232336.GB11474@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0f0554d-1bb0-fefa-a5d5-a252f7426c36@ideasonboard.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:19:30AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 12/09/2019 09:07, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:40:27PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >> On 06/09/2019 14:54, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>> Enable/disable the CMM associated with a CRTC at CRTC start and stop
> >>> time and enable the CMM unit through the Display Extensional Functions
> >>> register at group setup time.
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@fpond.eu>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 7 +++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c | 8 ++++++++
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h | 5 +++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> >>> index 23f1d6cc1719..3dac605c3a67 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> >>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >>> #include <drm/drm_plane_helper.h>
> >>> #include <drm/drm_vblank.h>
> >>>
> >>> +#include "rcar_cmm.h"
> >>> #include "rcar_du_crtc.h"
> >>> #include "rcar_du_drv.h"
> >>> #include "rcar_du_encoder.h"
> >>> @@ -619,6 +620,9 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_stop(struct rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc)
> >>> if (rcar_du_has(rcrtc->dev, RCAR_DU_FEATURE_VSP1_SOURCE))
> >>> rcar_du_vsp_disable(rcrtc);
> >>>
> >>> + if (rcrtc->cmm)
> >>> + rcar_cmm_disable(rcrtc->cmm);
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Select switch sync mode. This stops display operation and configures
> >>> * the HSYNC and VSYNC signals as inputs.
> >>> @@ -686,6 +690,9 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> rcar_du_crtc_start(rcrtc);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (rcrtc->cmm)
> >>> + rcar_cmm_enable(rcrtc->cmm);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static void rcar_du_crtc_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c
> >>> index 9eee47969e77..25d0fc125d7a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_group.c
> >>> @@ -147,6 +147,14 @@ static void rcar_du_group_setup(struct rcar_du_group *rgrp)
> >>>
> >>> rcar_du_group_setup_pins(rgrp);
> >>>
> >>> + if (rcar_du_has(rcdu, RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CMM)) {
> >>> + u32 defr7 = DEFR7_CODE
> >>> + | (rgrp->cmms_mask & BIT(1) ? DEFR7_CMME1 : 0)
> >>> + | (rgrp->cmms_mask & BIT(0) ? DEFR7_CMME0 : 0);
> >>> +
> >>> + rcar_du_group_write(rgrp, DEFR7, defr7);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>
> >> What's the effect here on platforms with a CMM, but with
> >> CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_CMM unset?
> >>
> >> Will this incorrectly configure the DU ?
> >>
> >> Will it stall the display if the DU tries to interact with another
> >> module which is not enabled?
> >
> > I recall I tested that (that's why I had to add stubs for CMM
> > functions, as I had linkage errors otherwise) and thing seems to be
> > fine as the CMM configuration/enblement resolve to an empty function.
>
> Yes, I see the stubs to allow for linkage, but it's the hardware I'm
> concerned about. If it passes the tests and doesn't break then that's
> probably ok ... but I'm really weary that we're enabling a hardware
> pipeline with a disabled component in the middle.
>
> > Would you prefer to have this guarded by an #if IS_ENABLED() ?
>
> I don't think we need a compile time conditional, but I'd say it
> probably needs to be more about whether the CMM has actually probed or not
>
> Aha, and I see that in rcar_du_cmm_init() we already do a
> call to rcar_cmm_init(), which if fails will leave rcdu->cmms[i] as
> NULL. So that's catered for, which results in the rgrp->cmms_mask being
> correctly representative of whether there is a CMM connected or not.
Doesn't this result in probe failure ?
> ... so I think that means the ...
> "if (rcar_du_has(rcdu, RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CMM))" is somewhat redundant:
>
>
> This could be:
>
> if (rgrp->cmms_mask) {
> u32 defr7 = DEFR7_CODE
> | (rgrp->cmms_mask & BIT(1) ? DEFR7_CMME1 : 0)
> | (rgrp->cmms_mask & BIT(0) ? DEFR7_CMME0 : 0);
>
> rcar_du_group_write(rgrp, DEFR7, defr7);
>
> Or in fact, if we don't mind writing 0 to DEFR7 when there is no CMM
> (which is safe by the looks of things as DEFR7 is available on all
> platforms), then we can even remove the outer conditional, and leave
> this all up to the ternary operators to write the correct value to the
> defr7.
>
> Phew ... net result - your current code *is* safe with the
> CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_CMM option disabled. I'll leave it up to you if you want
> to simplify the code here and remove the RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CMM.
>
> As this RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CMM flag is only checked here, removing it would
> however simplify all of the rcar_du_device_info structures.
>
> So - with or without the _FEATURE_CMM" simplification, this patch looks
> functional and safe so:
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>
> >>> if (rcdu->info->gen >= 2) {
> >>> rcar_du_group_setup_defr8(rgrp);
> >>> rcar_du_group_setup_didsr(rgrp);
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h
> >>> index bc87f080b170..fb9964949368 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_regs.h
> >>> @@ -197,6 +197,11 @@
> >>> #define DEFR6_MLOS1 (1 << 2)
> >>> #define DEFR6_DEFAULT (DEFR6_CODE | DEFR6_TCNE1)
> >>>
> >>> +#define DEFR7 0x000ec
> >>> +#define DEFR7_CODE (0x7779 << 16)
> >>> +#define DEFR7_CMME1 BIT(6)
> >>> +#define DEFR7_CMME0 BIT(4)
> >>> +
> >>> /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> * R8A7790-only Control Registers
> >>> */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-06 13:54 [PATCH v4 0/9 drm: rcar-du: Add Color Management Module (CMM) Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: display: renesas,cmm: Add R-Car CMM documentation Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 19:04 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-17 17:55 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-18 22:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] dt-bindings: display, renesas,du: Document cmms property Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 16:06 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-17 17:58 ` Rob Herring
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] drm: rcar-du: Add support for CMM Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 15:54 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-12 7:59 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-12 9:49 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-18 22:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-19 8:59 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-20 22:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-10-10 17:46 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-10-14 23:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] drm: rcar-du: Claim CMM support for Gen3 SoCs Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 18:45 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] drm: rcar-du: kms: Initialize CMM instances Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-12 9:27 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] drm: rcar-du: crtc: Enable and disable CMMs Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 18:40 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-12 8:07 ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-12 9:19 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-18 23:23 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2019-09-19 8:08 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-20 22:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] drm: rcar-du: crtc: Register GAMMA_LUT properties Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 18:47 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] drm: rcar-du: kms: Update CMM in atomic commit tail Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-12 9:51 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-20 22:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-30 20:53 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-10-01 19:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-09-06 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: Add CMM units to Gen3 SoCs Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-11 18:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-09-11 19:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190918232336.GB11474@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=Harsha.ManjulaMallikarjun@in.bosch.com \
--cc=VenkataRajesh.Kalakodima@in.bosch.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=koji.matsuoka.xm@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muroya@ksk.co.jp \
--cc=uli+renesas@fpond.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).