From: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Eugeniu Rosca" <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"Yoshihiro Shimoda" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Simon Horman" <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Eugeniu Rosca" <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com>,
"Harish Jenny K N" <harish_kandiga@mentor.com>,
"Andrew Gabbasov" <andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac: Add MMC_CAP_ERASE to Gen3 SoCs
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 23:07:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114220744.GA17678@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFp5iqrFDM1EWnYBwFmQAiAA5FADDLAyuVVBgMu4Sx=x5w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 01:48:41PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
[..]
>
> Let's first take a step back, because I don't know how the HW busy
> detection works for your controller.
>
> I have noticed there is TMIO_STAT_CMD_BUSY bit being set for some
> variants, which seems to cause renesas_sdhi_wait_idle() to loop for a
> pre-defined number of loops/timeout. This looks scary, but I can't
> tell if it's really a problem.
>
> BTW, do you know what TMIO_STAT_CMD_BUSY actually is monitoring?
>
> I have also noticed that MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY isn't set for any of
> the renesas/tmio variant hosts. Is that simply because the HW doesn't
> support this? Or because implementation is missing?
Hopefully Wolfram just addressed that?
> If you want to run a test that stretches the behaviour on the timeout
> path, I would rather use an SD-card (the older the better). For eMMCs
> the erase likely translates to a trim/discard, which is far more
> quicker than a real erase - as is what happens on an old SD card.
Running 'blkdiscard' with different SD cards on H3ULCB, I don't see any
signs of misbehavior:
root@rcar-gen3:~# blkdiscard -V
blkdiscard from util-linux 2.32.1
root@rcar-gen3:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 59.2G 0 disk
mmcblk0boot0 179:8 0 4M 1 disk
mmcblk0boot1 179:16 0 4M 1 disk
mmcblk1 179:24 0 30G 0 disk
# Erasing 32 GiB uSD Card
root@rcar-gen3:~# time blkdiscard -v /dev/mmcblk1
/dev/mmcblk1: Discarded 32227983360 bytes from the offset 0
real 0m1.198s
user 0m0.001s
sys 0m0.122s
# Erasing 64 GiB eMMC
root@rcar-gen3:~# time blkdiscard -v /dev/mmcblk0
/dev/mmcblk0: Discarded 63585648640 bytes from the offset 0
real 0m8.703s
user 0m0.002s
sys 0m1.909s
I guess that by decreasing below erase sizes, I could further increase
the execution time, but these sysfs properties are read-only:
cat /sys/devices/platform/soc/ee100000.sd/mmc_host/mmc1/mmc1:59b4/preferred_erase_size
4194304
cat /sys/devices/platform/soc/ee100000.sd/mmc_host/mmc1/mmc1:59b4/erase_size
512
--
Best Regards,
Eugeniu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 13:48 [PATCH] mmc: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac: Add MMC_CAP_ERASE to Gen3 SoCs Eugeniu Rosca
2019-11-12 20:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-11-14 10:56 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-14 11:37 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2019-11-14 12:48 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-14 20:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-11-15 9:19 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-15 10:12 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-11-15 10:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-14 22:07 ` Eugeniu Rosca [this message]
2019-11-15 9:27 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-11-15 12:51 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2019-11-15 13:54 ` Eugeniu Rosca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191114220744.GA17678@vmlxhi-102.adit-jv.com \
--to=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=harish_kandiga@mentor.com \
--cc=horms+renesas@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
--cc=roscaeugeniu@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).