linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Lukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@samsung.com>
Cc: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	"Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Eric Miao" <eric.miao@nvidia.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Chris Brandt" <chris.brandt@renesas.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: boot: Obtain start of physical memory from DTB
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:30:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200519093005.GX1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dleftjmu645mqn.fsf%l.stelmach@samsung.com>

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:53:52AM +0200, Lukasz Stelmach wrote:
> It was <2020-04-29 śro 10:21>, when Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Currently, the start address of physical memory is obtained by masking
> > the program counter with a fixed mask of 0xf8000000.  This mask value
> > was chosen as a balance between the requirements of different platforms.
> > However, this does require that the start address of physical memory is
> > a multiple of 128 MiB, precluding booting Linux on platforms where this
> > requirement is not fulfilled.
> >
> > Fix this limitation by obtaining the start address from the DTB instead,
> > if available (either explicitly passed, or appended to the kernel).
> > Fall back to the traditional method when needed.
> >
> > This allows to boot Linux on r7s9210/rza2mevb using the 64 MiB of SDRAM
> > on the RZA2MEVB sub board, which is located at 0x0C000000 (CS3 space),
> > i.e. not at a multiple of 128 MiB.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
> > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > Tested-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> > ---
> 
> [...]
> 
> Apparently reading physical memory layout from DTB breaks crashdump
> kernels. A crashdump kernel is loaded into a region of memory, that is
> reserved in the original (i.e. to be crashed) kernel. The reserved
> region is large enough for the crashdump kernel to run completely inside
> it and don't modify anything outside it, just read and dump the remains
> of the crashed kernel. Using the information from DTB makes the
> decompressor place the kernel outside of the dedicated region.
> 
> The log below shows that a zImage and DTB are loaded at 0x18eb8000 and
> 0x193f6000 (physical). The kernel is expected to run at 0x18008000, but
> it is decompressed to 0x00008000 (see r4 reported before jumping from
> within __enter_kernel).

Right, and it's important that the kernel decompresses to 0x18008000
so it doesn't overwrite memory that was being used by the crashing
kernel, and thus can create a true coredump image of the failed
kernel.  Meanwhile, the DTB still needs to describe the full memory
layout so that we know where memory is located in order to coredump
it properly.

So, this is a flaw with this approach, and will need the commit to be
dropped yet again - this patch is fundamentally incompatible with the
way kexec's crashdump works.

Looking back at the history, we've been trying this approach since
February with four patches submitted to the patch system, and problems
eventually found with each of them.  I think this shows that the way
the decompressor works out where to decompress the kernel to today is
relied upon all over the place, and changing it is always going to
cause problems.  So, I don't think we /can/ change it without causing
a regression for someone.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-19  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20200429082134eucas1p2415c5269202529e6b019f2d70c1b5572@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-04-29  8:21 ` [PATCH v6] ARM: boot: Obtain start of physical memory from DTB Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-19  8:53   ` Lukasz Stelmach
2020-05-19  9:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-05-19  9:44     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-19  9:46       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-19 11:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-19 11:28           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-19 12:11             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-19 11:43           ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
     [not found]             ` <CGME20200519122044eucas1p1220e8827c66dd1ace94b0a86a34f9c37@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-05-19 12:20               ` Lukasz Stelmach
2020-05-19 12:27                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
     [not found]                   ` <CGME20200519125008eucas1p2fe9f14c8f785e956a15097d1eca491c7@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-05-19 12:49                     ` Lukasz Stelmach
2020-05-19 13:12                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
     [not found]                         ` <CGME20200519140211eucas1p24dbc0f54594983731a2dcdd4a943ae27@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-05-19 14:02                           ` Lukasz Stelmach
     [not found]           ` <CGME20200519114657eucas1p156e85218074a7656b93b162e6242bc56@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2020-05-19 11:46             ` Lukasz Stelmach
2020-05-19 13:56           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-19 14:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-05-19 14:32               ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200519093005.GX1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=chris.brandt@renesas.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.miao@nvidia.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=l.stelmach@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).