linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pwm: Some improvements for legacy drivers
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 12:45:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210701104528.dbnhhswxp6rgzzj3@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWFL42BV9m7Oigvy0m7=-i4W0hnQT8izHdNNiYG0BfiMQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1649 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 10:58:32AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:29 AM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > this is the successor of my earlier patch "pwm: Ensure for legacy
> > drivers that pwm->state stays consistent" that was applied shortly to
> > next until Geert found a problem with it.
> >
> > I split the patch in three parts now: First the legacy handling is just
> > moved to a separate function without any semantic change. Then a glitch
> > is fixed, but without the regression I introduced initially. In the
> > third and last patch the longstanding FIXME about breaking pwm->state if
> > a callback fails is addressed.
> >
> > Uwe Kleine-König (3):
> >   pwm: Move legacy driver handling into a dedicated function
> >   pwm: Prevent a glitch for legacy drivers
> >   pwm: Restore initial state if a legacy callback fails
> >
> >  drivers/pwm/core.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks, works fine on Armadillo 800 EVA!
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>

Thanks for testing.

> > base-commit: 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5
> 
> That's plain v5.13-rc1, which is probably not what Thierry is targeting?

his for-next branch is based on v5.13-rc1 and there are no changes in it
touching drivers/pwm/core.c, so I expect this to be fine.
 
Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-01 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210701072927.328254-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
2021-07-01  8:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] pwm: Some improvements for legacy drivers Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-01 10:45   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2021-07-01 11:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-07-01 12:19       ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210701104528.dbnhhswxp6rgzzj3@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).