From: Kieran Bingham <kieran@ksquared.org.uk>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: add simple caching to the 'alias' scanning
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:59:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3308e0c2-34be-0675-1c9a-3fcf6620ed91@bingham.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191231161400.1688-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Hi Wolfram,
On 31/12/2019 16:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Add some simple caching of the last used alias to skip some unneeded
> scanning of the I2C bus. When freeing the device, the cache will be set
> back.
Seems simplistic enough and would do the job, given the current
implementation...
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/i2c.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 5a010e7e698f..0cc4a5c49a15 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -830,6 +830,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_new_device);
> */
> void i2c_unregister_device(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + struct i2c_adapter *adap = client->adapter;
> +
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(client))
> return;
>
> @@ -840,6 +842,14 @@ void i2c_unregister_device(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> if (ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev))
> acpi_device_clear_enumerated(ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev));
> +
> + i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
> +
> + if (client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_ALIAS && client->addr < adap->alias_idx)
Phew, I thought on the first read we were going to end up shrinking the
available alias pool when we unregister devices with high addresses, (I
missed the client->addr < adap->alias_idx statement first)
> + adap->alias_idx = client->addr;
> +
> + i2c_unlock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
> +
> device_unregister(&client->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_unregister_device);
> @@ -1297,6 +1307,7 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> adap->lock_ops = &i2c_adapter_lock_ops;
>
> adap->locked_flags = 0;
> + adap->alias_idx = 0x08; /* first valid I2C address */
> rt_mutex_init(&adap->bus_lock);
> rt_mutex_init(&adap->mux_lock);
> mutex_init(&adap->userspace_clients_lock);
> @@ -2249,10 +2260,12 @@ struct i2c_client *i2c_new_alias_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>
> i2c_lock_bus(adap, I2C_LOCK_SEGMENT);
>
> - for (addr = 0x08; addr < 0x78; addr++) {
> + for (addr = adap->alias_idx; addr < 0x78; addr++) {
> ret = i2c_scan_for_client(adap, addr, i2c_unlocked_read_byte_probe);
> if (ret == -ENODEV) {
> alias = i2c_new_dummy_device(adap, addr);
> + alias->flags |= I2C_CLIENT_ALIAS;
Potential here for a comment to clarify the alias_idx, but it's not
required:
/* Prevent re-scanning occupied addresses */
> + adap->alias_idx = addr + 1;
> dev_dbg(&adap->dev, "Found alias: 0x%x\n", addr);
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index 583ca2aec022..6427c2db5ee0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -309,6 +309,7 @@ struct i2c_driver {
> struct i2c_client {
> unsigned short flags; /* div., see below */
> #define I2C_CLIENT_PEC 0x04 /* Use Packet Error Checking */
> +#define I2C_CLIENT_ALIAS 0x08 /* client is an alias */
> #define I2C_CLIENT_TEN 0x10 /* we have a ten bit chip address */
Unrelated to this patch, but I love that the flag for CLIENT_TEN is 0x10 :-D
> /* Must equal I2C_M_TEN below */
> #define I2C_CLIENT_SLAVE 0x20 /* we are the slave */
> @@ -715,6 +716,7 @@ struct i2c_adapter {
> const struct i2c_adapter_quirks *quirks;
>
> struct irq_domain *host_notify_domain;
> + u16 alias_idx;
> };
> #define to_i2c_adapter(d) container_of(d, struct i2c_adapter, dev)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-31 16:13 [RFC PATCH 0/5] i2c: implement mechanism to retrieve an alias device Wolfram Sang
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] i2c: core: refactor scanning for a client Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:45 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 9:26 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-07 9:58 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07 10:25 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 10:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-07 11:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 15:03 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-07 16:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 16:52 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] i2c: core: add new variant to check " Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 9:42 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] i2c: core: add function to request an alias Wolfram Sang
2020-01-01 16:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-02 18:58 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-02 21:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-02 22:27 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-03 0:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 15:03 ` Luca Ceresoli
2020-01-07 17:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-08 13:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:31 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-08 13:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-01-08 13:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-02 21:03 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-21 9:05 ` Peter Rosin
2020-01-07 9:40 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-07 17:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-01-07 17:14 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-01-08 13:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2020-01-08 13:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2019-12-31 16:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] i2c: core: add simple caching to the 'alias' scanning Wolfram Sang
2020-01-07 9:59 ` Kieran Bingham [this message]
2020-01-21 9:22 ` Peter Rosin
2019-12-31 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] simple test case for the I2C alias functionality Wolfram Sang
2019-12-31 16:27 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] i2c: implement mechanism to retrieve an alias device Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3308e0c2-34be-0675-1c9a-3fcf6620ed91@bingham.xyz \
--to=kieran@ksquared.org.uk \
--cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
--cc=vz@mleia.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).