linux-renesas-soc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com>,
	"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
	Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com>,
	Biju Das <biju.das@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 16/18] ravb: Add Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:27:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82f58946-b88b-8990-8788-a58f8d1468c2@omp.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210923140813.13541-17-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>

On 9/23/21 5:08 PM, Biju Das wrote:

> This patch series adds RX(packet receive) function for
> Gigabit Ethernet found on RZ/G2L SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h      |   1 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> index b0e067a6a8ee..85260f89e1cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> @@ -1092,6 +1092,7 @@ struct ravb_private {
>  
>  	int duplex;
>  	struct ravb_rx_desc *rgeth_rx_ring[NUM_RX_QUEUE];
> +	struct sk_buff *rxtop_skb;

   I'd prefer for this one declared earler in the *struct*, as well. And why not e.g 'rx_1st_skb'?

>  
>  	const struct ravb_hw_info *info;
>  	struct reset_control *rstc;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index a08da7a37b92..867e180e6655 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -705,6 +705,23 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	u8 *hw_csum;
> +
> +	/* The hardware checksum is contained in sizeof(__sum16) (2) bytes
> +	 * appended to packet data
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16)))
> +		return;
> +	hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - sizeof(__sum16);
> +
> +	if (*hw_csum == 0)
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> +	else
> +		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;

   Mhm, what's the point of this whole function then? Why it can't be a copy of the R-Car analog?

[...]
> @@ -720,11 +737,147 @@ static void ravb_rx_csum(struct sk_buff *skb)
[...]
>  /* Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet */
>  static bool ravb_rgeth_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q)
>  {
> -	/* Place holder */
> -	return true;
> +	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	int entry = priv->cur_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q];
> +	int boguscnt = priv->dirty_rx[q] + priv->num_rx_ring[q] - priv->cur_rx[q];
> +	struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->stats[q];

   [q] should be dropped, as we've agreed...

> +	struct ravb_rx_desc *desc;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> +	u8  desc_status;
> +	u8  die_dt;
> +	u16 pkt_len;
> +	int limit;
> +
> +	boguscnt = min(boguscnt, *quota);
> +	limit = boguscnt;
> +	desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry];
> +	while (desc->die_dt != DT_FEMPTY) {
> +		/* Descriptor type must be checked before all other reads */
> +		dma_rmb();
> +		desc_status = desc->msc;
> +		pkt_len = le16_to_cpu(desc->ds_cc) & RX_DS;
> +
> +		if (--boguscnt < 0)
> +			break;
> +
> +		/* We use 0-byte descriptors to mark the DMA mapping errors */
> +		if (!pkt_len)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (desc_status & MSC_MC)
> +			stats->multicast++;
> +
> +		if (desc_status & (MSC_CRC | MSC_RFE | MSC_RTSF | MSC_RTLF | MSC_CEEF)) {
> +			stats->rx_errors++;
> +			if (desc_status & MSC_CRC)
> +				stats->rx_crc_errors++;
> +			if (desc_status & MSC_RFE)
> +				stats->rx_frame_errors++;
> +			if (desc_status & (MSC_RTLF | MSC_RTSF))
> +				stats->rx_length_errors++;
> +			if (desc_status & MSC_CEEF)
> +				stats->rx_missed_errors++;
> +		} else {
> +			die_dt = desc->die_dt & 0xF0;
> +			switch (die_dt) {
> +			case DT_FSINGLE:
> +				skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc);
> +				skb_put(skb, pkt_len);
> +				skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> +				if (ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> +					ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(skb);
> +				napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi[q], skb);
> +				stats->rx_packets++;
> +				stats->rx_bytes += pkt_len;
> +				break;
> +			case DT_FSTART:
> +				priv->rxtop_skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc);

   But don't you need to  copy the data in this case?

> +				skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len);
> +				break;
> +			case DT_FMID:
> +				skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc);
> +				skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(priv->rxtop_skb,
> +							       priv->rxtop_skb->len,
> +							       skb->data,
> +							       pkt_len);
> +				skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len);
> +				dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +				break;
> +			case DT_FEND:
> +				skb = ravb_get_skb_rgeth(ndev, q, entry, desc);
> +				skb_copy_to_linear_data_offset(priv->rxtop_skb,
> +							       priv->rxtop_skb->len,
> +							       skb->data,
> +							       pkt_len);
> +				skb_put(priv->rxtop_skb, pkt_len);
> +				dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> +				priv->rxtop_skb->protocol =
> +					eth_type_trans(priv->rxtop_skb, ndev);
> +				if (ndev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> +					ravb_rx_csum_rgeth(skb);
> +				napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi[q],
> +						 priv->rxtop_skb);
> +				stats->rx_packets++;
> +				stats->rx_bytes += priv->rxtop_skb->len;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		entry = (++priv->cur_rx[q]) % priv->num_rx_ring[q];
> +		desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry];
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Refill the RX ring buffers. */
> +	for (; priv->cur_rx[q] - priv->dirty_rx[q] > 0; priv->dirty_rx[q]++) {
> +		entry = priv->dirty_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q];
> +		desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][entry];
> +		desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(RGETH_RX_DESC_DATA_SIZE);
> +
> +		if (!priv->rx_skb[q][entry]) {
> +			skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev,
> +					       RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX + RAVB_ALIGN - 1);

   ALIGN(RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, RAVB_ALIGN)?

[...]

MBR, Sergey

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-23 14:07 [RFC/PATCH 00/18] Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 01/18] ravb: Rename "ravb_set_features_rx_csum" function to "ravb_set_features_rcar" Biju Das
2021-09-27 19:54   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 14:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 02/18] ravb: Rename the variables "no_ptp_cfg_active" and "ptp_cfg_active" Biju Das
2021-09-23 16:07   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 16:35     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 17:57       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 18:20         ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:34           ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 03/18] ravb: Initialize GbEthernet dmac Biju Das
2021-09-23 17:41   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 18:42     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 19:07   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 19:22     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 19:29       ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:38         ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 04/18] ravb: Enable aligned_tx and tx_counters for RZ/G2L Biju Das
2021-09-23 18:05   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 18:10     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 18:13     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:40       ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 05/18] ravb: Exclude gPTP feature support " Biju Das
2021-09-23 19:00   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 19:13     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 19:41       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 19:45         ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:48           ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 06/18] ravb: Add multi_tsrq to struct ravb_hw_info Biju Das
2021-09-23 20:19   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-24  6:19     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:54       ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 07/18] ravb: Add magic_pkt " Biju Das
2021-09-23 20:42   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-24  6:24     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 13:56       ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 08/18] ravb: Add mii_rgmii_selection " Biju Das
2021-09-24 19:49   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-25  6:23     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 15:49       ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 09/18] ravb: Add half_duplex " Biju Das
2021-09-24 20:07   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-25  6:37     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 15:51     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 10/18] ravb: Initialize GbEthernet E-MAC Biju Das
2021-09-24 20:44   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-25  6:38     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 11/18] ravb: Add rx_2k_buffers to struct ravb_hw_info Biju Das
2021-09-24 19:35   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-26 15:48     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 12/18] ravb: Add timestamp " Biju Das
2021-09-25 20:52   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-26  6:34     ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 16:52       ` Biju Das
2021-09-26 20:45       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-26 20:48         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2021-09-27  6:10           ` Biju Das
2021-09-27  6:04         ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 13/18] ravb: Add rx_ring_free function support for GbEthernet Biju Das
2021-09-27 19:28   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-28  9:24     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 14/18] ravb: Add rx_ring_format function " Biju Das
2021-09-27 20:32   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-29  7:49     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 15/18] ravb: Add rx_alloc helper " Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 16/18] ravb: Add Packet receive function for Gigabit Ethernet Biju Das
2021-10-01 17:27   ` Sergey Shtylyov [this message]
2021-10-04 14:56     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 17/18] ravb: Add carrier_counters to struct ravb_hw_info Biju Das
2021-09-28 20:50   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 14:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 18/18] ravb: Add set_feature support for RZ/G2L Biju Das
2021-09-30 20:39   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-10-01  6:53     ` Biju Das
2021-10-01  9:13       ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-10-01  9:26         ` Biju Das
2021-10-01  8:22     ` Biju Das
2021-09-23 15:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 00/18] Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 15:13   ` Sergey Shtylyov
2021-09-23 15:37   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-23 17:43     ` Sergey Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82f58946-b88b-8990-8788-a58f8d1468c2@omp.ru \
    --to=s.shtylyov@omp.ru \
    --cc=Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com \
    --cc=aford173@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=biju.das@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=sergei.shtylyov@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).