From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71660C3F2D3 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EAF246AC for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="i6Mz6v7N" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727401AbgB1Wn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:43:29 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:42429 "EHLO mail-lf1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727146AbgB1Wn3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:43:29 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 83so3247026lfh.9 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:43:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1BxbADyqh67zLR4CkPE+bXFbR7jY3OFFxVQi+eBGBI8=; b=i6Mz6v7Na8BLINyiuQ/hSPnAQQmxYEOfbBcBVFXW97UtP8mWO1dwLWdjpxC9QcQGCg GdGmH5PSCv3zZzOrPrMscGcCVDWEUpcF/bT6gk4hxsNm+jfO9DSU3BDnWl0836NcMsVt AeoxZzXYTmEmRyTbde9eiR8/snn6du/PNUk9R33LMErQxsnUUVCGoyzoCaR7OPs1Lycm KFvIQTf9dTXt9wDtHbgx+sHgl2V0qBKNBlC7Chtn3n2RL5q+hsn2Nku/sT5hzRzxg/Mk GW5LmRNmZk92fK87ghlEjij9rPeSrQnhwdJqJ4cTn9k4ZWcE8oEBFHkcz1F+cG8aVhSU oaUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1BxbADyqh67zLR4CkPE+bXFbR7jY3OFFxVQi+eBGBI8=; b=UM4l0CPOTwZxGzm+dg5TeRoAkFQ1XwLt6ULuI53EROHEalgJ/tiNUN93CDAcgohzwx rVNOJy2CvabsJlEnAtwUSUNuhAp9vV+Vl2g9OAbxULIwrHUsuVZwAsv/LlJL9vPNF3dy YFG0m1jCO4r9pxZiZQm9cBFjLD7IHCdGdIy8EGuUhRxTJh8SJexWOlPFJ2ggT/NlhhQE 6nCMAjxsB/ZormY7pB6PPR4BQh9YCoz5YSL3IyMizM29au1XzQACbd1C9U5ov3oCWTCN 6Q4GNsvpRjNvhuaUWwUenIV8r5xV1EIW5/JcG+kWmYmA/4TmhZQJBb+vrcPx6ieOUkmh tjYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1izn8AfoQtOR520K1TJ/H+uLZBB1hLkZpH5M/3aZLMYnTygemJ jsR2SNm5zBZgETlo6WuDCS5MBVGCAUkT5t9yUNTtcA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvwV+eXKAqc/AH6wyolv56OmLms52Q1I+Lg/sFK1m7+034EZ451eAX8G9p01LxfFc6BXUqFS0ufeeNdx6RY9L0= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:44a5:: with SMTP id c5mr3584341lfm.4.1582929807065; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:43:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200220130149.26283-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20200220130149.26283-2-geert+renesas@glider.be> In-Reply-To: From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog() To: Frank Rowand Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Rob Herring , Bartosz Golaszewski , Pantelis Antoniou , Mark Rutland , Peter Ujfalusi , Chris Brandt , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux-Renesas , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:18 PM Frank Rowand wrote: > On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Patch applied with Frank's Review tag. > > I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches > fix. > > I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere, > immediately followed by Geert's patch series. This way, after > applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's > series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass. > > Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via > your tree or Rob's tree? I see Rob already applied the test. I do not personally bother much about which order problems get solved but I guess if Rob can back out the patch I can apply it to my tree instead, before these patches. for some time, before I start pulling stuff on top. Yours, Linus Walleij