From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7AFCA9EB0 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1EB222C6 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="oAlES9Ui" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728647AbfKDASp (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2019 19:18:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-f66.google.com ([209.85.222.66]:44447 "EHLO mail-ua1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728645AbfKDASp (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Nov 2019 19:18:45 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f66.google.com with SMTP id r22so1871153uam.11 for ; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 16:18:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+5L2eq9DWTqYID3ithkG+AoL6nhEs7tI6RGB4Dd8Zf4=; b=oAlES9Uid7iSYZ2y6NPfHWjyad0j5hCqs5prmtdgJ2mK997WAVlxzJG3ynZVmC7nVi mB54L2mfLf/Ymo2mr37VdY7P/VmPPDIkSj6dVPXoVoUbv4/bi0abmhjwnmb/FELUCiFe WUmE0cxKBRBV/GLK0T6OlpT++peIpQTvzfheDW+VYHwnVh2WMPfAGGv0Jll4lQ9KmdAX KUTaR0YLzT9+mGViBviY1QVrl63MXjbWJ1L7dXjYhxykfLjDCnezbRw37cjm6t8NlKrx vUEPiPlqJXQVEvz5N1BTYEZa2S6mllw04JXsrNQAwnirXTN3hH91Hd5eJcmUXVJGR71Z pSrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+5L2eq9DWTqYID3ithkG+AoL6nhEs7tI6RGB4Dd8Zf4=; b=LHY8hR2+Mz4gr8dqgxogv9EyIH6t58+MfMfuDmT15iZmNnWwmr/uH6vBNCkKQ9mKgN B7v3SCnFWiQPElwCRDstyLwQNA2LRdOeTyfqYZILK21L73hgxCn+4HbRxb56TqHtOjin WOn3IBJAsgb5YIkAZVCg/FH8S2Xmeo9WvfdtCxk3hhrtYlAH1/m9PcLLWrKbjfk8P0Ff HcpUGVkGMomErl/u/Wil0/xw0/E3tqD2zz+HV9CEBmqm9wWo+8aF/1hcZaDpQoYLJS8S BsVgyEeAQ5lutVbEX1ai5JDLIkwAMBIsXGZviXZ9LjYkmYh3XgMVLFHruYCBSSEA8UIb EMUg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWU0Rozc03jpVsICKCNHUI3+IO3KJlXkvsU5lHKQWrQi6NIzyK /kb5bgUPyoqagRR+MP5KIbw2Xb/TwAiv2Dpbm6epUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxaDMOhPupmDshbsu4K1ddLDJNFp+Loev7XOmTsYtFTpgq7W/3FH8VrI3bEONc6DjxIfdtklet+o4Mib1wkwhc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:70a9:: with SMTP id q9mr4518172ual.84.1572826722501; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 16:18:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191017122640.22976-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20191017122640.22976-2-yuehaibing@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20191017122640.22976-2-yuehaibing@huawei.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:18:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 01/30] pinctrl: pxa25x: use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify code To: YueHaibing Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= , Florian Fainelli , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list , Jesper Nilsson , Lars Persson , Ludovic Desroches , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Baruch Siach , Linux ARM , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-oxnas@groups.io, Linux-Renesas , MSM , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy , Neil Armstrong , Geert Uytterhoeven , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Chen-Yu Tsai , "thierry.reding@gmail.com" , Jon Hunter , Andy Gross Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:48 PM YueHaibing wrote: > Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() to simplify the code a bit. > This is detected by coccinelle. > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing These are too many patches changing too little. One patch should be one technical step. I'd say squash them all into one big patch and resend. You can collect the ACKs you received, but don't put too many people on CC, they will be annoyed. Yours, Linus Walleij