From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB29EC63798 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03FA6128C for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:21:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232170AbhGVNky (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:40:54 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43018 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232332AbhGVNjc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:39:32 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFE616135B; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:20:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1626963601; bh=mJ3JdT0Jl0HeZBBxWkcKK7bwXZcdzgqg5y3jXt3+kZs=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=ENCgLVRWTYWJGmbpAbWSfCDWo21E52HEXh7c50OdL/+YGGo4tdSiNuuo+dOLYkEsX 6QIfpekMB7Dy5uaOoI6/ve7Fg4ujPmH0iVrjeO0O/a88Y+Nhul0jarTbME/G8yYD3j EdVDQnDzwW9ZDYTiD5Xu9lahxyOo63mZDqk1angMstTmSTOPOfy1JREfjZM3A4SdTH u+PA7jaWbcQAcZAgP04bniCthOJbRwKBxHjrNzXVpLk52i7IrBVVpGOAI6x7OXjKM/ ynpK5INQnHPg5ZMtvF7nwE4uiV2uqb2pG5Dxth9b80+AsYiJPCKy/QgPgCfciOU+AN IvtT5iQbHTfQg== Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id qa36so8593607ejc.10; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jrq2ylAhf8X19GC7KWhr62T4XEF5Lkx1MsS07a24Hul/YYAq7 Pq8ecTOrQj/hCXf8S4y72vQ4XuiZbGlluw8DbA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPx2tAkBfnTYAJdL+pjejcJt5SFRuqenmexCc8UCCTJ3rc8BOHTUiTGbeTgwSbLXr4S6GftAjXVwj1/pePKQI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:28d1:: with SMTP id p17mr153498ejd.130.1626963600297; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:20:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210719182001.1573-1-alexander.helms.jy@renesas.com> <20210719182001.1573-2-alexander.helms.jy@renesas.com> <20210719224804.GA2768983@robh.at.kernel.org> <6fbb307e-8835-224e-7912-2b956985a713@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <6fbb307e-8835-224e-7912-2b956985a713@renesas.com> From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:19:47 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: Add binding for Renesas 8T49N241 To: Alex Helms Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Michael Turquette , "open list:MEDIA DRIVERS FOR RENESAS - FCP" , david.cater.jc@renesas.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Boyd , Michal Simek , linux-clk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:58 AM Alex Helms wrote: > > On 7/19/2021 3:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:20:00 -0700, Alex Helms wrote: > >> Renesas 8T49N241 has 4 outputs, 1 integral and 3 fractional dividers. > >> The 8T49N241 accepts up to two differential or single-ended input clocks > >> and a fundamental-mode crystal input. The internal PLL can lock to either > >> of the input reference clocks or to the crystal to behave as a frequency > >> synthesizer. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alex Helms > >> --- > >> .../bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml | 190 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> MAINTAINERS | 6 + > >> 2 files changed, 196 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/renesas,8t49n241.yaml > >> > > > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > > > Thank you for the info. I'm new to the kernel process and appreciate your advice. > > I felt uncomfortable adding your Reviewed-By tag but since there were no changes to the dt > portion of the patch, in retrospect I guess I should have added it. I'll keep this in mind > for the future. Is there anything I need to do for this patch? For v5, no. If there's a v6 posted, then add any tags. Rob