* [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support @ 2019-06-14 13:14 Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-17 9:33 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-18 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-14 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland Cc: Fabrizio Castro, Magnus Damm, linux-renesas-soc, devicetree, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board common device tree. Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> --- This patch depends on: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10986913/ Thanks, Fab arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi index 18763ca..b0bf510 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; }; + leds { + compatible = "gpio-leds"; + + led0 { + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + label = "LED0"; + }; + + led1 { + gpios = <&gpio6 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + label = "LED1"; + }; + + led2 { + gpios = <&gpio6 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + label = "LED2"; + }; + + led3 { + gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + label = "LED3"; + }; + }; + reg_1p8v: regulator0 { compatible = "regulator-fixed"; regulator-name = "fixed-1.8V"; -- 2.7.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-14 13:14 [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-17 9:33 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-18 10:40 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-18 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2019-06-17 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, linux-renesas-soc, devicetree, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:14:35PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > common device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > --- > This patch depends on: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10986913/ Thanks, This looks fine to me but I will wait to see if there are other reviews before applying. Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-17 9:33 ` Simon Horman @ 2019-06-18 10:40 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2019-06-18 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, linux-renesas-soc, devicetree, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 11:33:14AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:14:35PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > > common device tree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > > --- > > This patch depends on: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10986913/ > > Thanks, > > This looks fine to me but I will wait to see if there are other reviews > before applying. I have applied this for inclusion in v5.3. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-14 13:14 [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-17 9:33 ` Simon Horman @ 2019-06-18 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-06-18 15:56 ` Fabrizio Castro 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-06-18 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Simon Horman, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji Hi Fabrizio, On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > common device tree. > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> Thanks for your patch! > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > }; > > + leds { > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > + > + led0 { > + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + label = "LED0"; There's no need for a label property, if it matches the node name (applies to all four LEDs). Note that this GPIO is shared with a switch, like on Salvator-X(S) and ULCB. As currently Linux cannot handle both, describing the LED precludes adding the switch later. (applies to the first 3 LEDs). > + led3 { > + gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + label = "LED3"; > + }; I cannot find LED3. According to the schematics GP0_0 == CS0n is used as the chipselect for the LVDS switch? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-18 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-06-18 15:56 ` Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-19 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-18 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Simon Horman, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji Hello Geert, Thank you for your feedback! > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > Sent: 18 June 2019 16:10 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > Hi Fabrizio, > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Fabrizio Castro > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > > common device tree. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > > Thanks for your patch! > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ > > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > > }; > > > > + leds { > > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > + > > + led0 { > > + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + label = "LED0"; > > There's no need for a label property, if it matches the node name > (applies to all four LEDs). I could have used the actual names on the schematic, but then I realised that would not have been too helpful due to the corresponding switch names: LED0 - GP6_11 - SW2202 - LED2201 LED1 - GP6_12 - SW2201 - LED2202 LED2 - GP6_13 - SW2203 - LED2203 LED3 - GP0_00 - N/A - LED2402 The first 3 LEDs are found next to the micro USB connector for the debug console, the forth LED is found next to the WiFi and BT LEDs. I thought that using "LEDn" as labels would put a remark on the "desired ordering" of the LEDs (even though there is no actual requirement for that), but as you pointed out it's probably a bit confusing? Do you think I should take the label out? > > Note that this GPIO is shared with a switch, like on Salvator-X(S) and > ULCB. As currently Linux cannot handle both, describing the LED > precludes adding the switch later. > (applies to the first 3 LEDs). Thank you for pointing this out. That's desired behaviour in this case. > > > + led3 { > > + gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > + label = "LED3"; > > + }; > > I cannot find LED3. According to the schematics GP0_0 == CS0n is used > as the chipselect for the LVDS switch? My understanding is that CS0n is on GP1_20, could you please double check? (pin name: AJ4) GP0_00 == D0 == ExD0 on the schematic I have, I thought you may have been looking at an older version of the schematic, but after going through the history it seems like that line has always been there. Thanks, Fab > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-18 15:56 ` Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-19 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-06-19 8:16 ` Fabrizio Castro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-06-19 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Simon Horman, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji Hi Fabrizio, On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > > Sent: 18 June 2019 16:10 > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Fabrizio Castro > > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > > > common device tree. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ > > > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > > > }; > > > > > > + leds { > > > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > > + > > > + led0 { > > > + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > + label = "LED0"; > > > > There's no need for a label property, if it matches the node name > > (applies to all four LEDs). > > I could have used the actual names on the schematic, but then I realised that > would not have been too helpful due to the corresponding switch names: > LED0 - GP6_11 - SW2202 - LED2201 > LED1 - GP6_12 - SW2201 - LED2202 > LED2 - GP6_13 - SW2203 - LED2203 > LED3 - GP0_00 - N/A - LED2402 > The first 3 LEDs are found next to the micro USB connector for the debug console, > the forth LED is found next to the WiFi and BT LEDs. > > I thought that using "LEDn" as labels would put a remark on the > "desired ordering" of the LEDs (even though there is no actual > requirement for that), but as you pointed out it's probably a bit > confusing? Do you think I should take the label out? If the LEDs don't have nice labels on the PCB, I would drop the label properties. > > Note that this GPIO is shared with a switch, like on Salvator-X(S) and > > ULCB. As currently Linux cannot handle both, describing the LED > > precludes adding the switch later. > > (applies to the first 3 LEDs). > > Thank you for pointing this out. That's desired behaviour in this case. OK. > > > + led3 { > > > + gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > + label = "LED3"; > > > + }; > > > > I cannot find LED3. According to the schematics GP0_0 == CS0n is used > > as the chipselect for the LVDS switch? > > My understanding is that CS0n is on GP1_20, could you please double > check? > (pin name: AJ4) GP0_00 == D0 == ExD0 on the schematic I have, I thought > you may have been looking at an older version of the schematic, but after > going through the history it seems like that line has always been there. Sorry, my mistake. As there is no GP0_0 in the schematic, I looked up the pin number in the docs, but ended up using the R-Car M3-W SiP pin number, instead of the RZ/G2M FCBGA SoC pin number :-( Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-19 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2019-06-19 8:16 ` Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-19 12:18 ` Simon Horman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-19 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven, Simon Horman Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji Hello Geert, Thank you for your feedback > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > Sent: 19 June 2019 08:34 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > Hi Fabrizio, > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabrizio Castro > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > > > Sent: 18 June 2019 16:10 > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Fabrizio Castro > > > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > > > > common device tree. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > > @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ > > > > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > + leds { > > > > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > > > + > > > > + led0 { > > > > + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > > + label = "LED0"; > > > > > > There's no need for a label property, if it matches the node name > > > (applies to all four LEDs). > > > > I could have used the actual names on the schematic, but then I realised that > > would not have been too helpful due to the corresponding switch names: > > LED0 - GP6_11 - SW2202 - LED2201 > > LED1 - GP6_12 - SW2201 - LED2202 > > LED2 - GP6_13 - SW2203 - LED2203 > > LED3 - GP0_00 - N/A - LED2402 > > The first 3 LEDs are found next to the micro USB connector for the debug console, > > the forth LED is found next to the WiFi and BT LEDs. > > > > I thought that using "LEDn" as labels would put a remark on the > > "desired ordering" of the LEDs (even though there is no actual > > requirement for that), but as you pointed out it's probably a bit > > confusing? Do you think I should take the label out? > > If the LEDs don't have nice labels on the PCB, I would drop the label > properties. Will do. Simon, do you want me to send an incremental patch for this (this patch is on devel branch already) or would you rather I sent a v2? Thanks, Fab > > > > Note that this GPIO is shared with a switch, like on Salvator-X(S) and > > > ULCB. As currently Linux cannot handle both, describing the LED > > > precludes adding the switch later. > > > (applies to the first 3 LEDs). > > > > Thank you for pointing this out. That's desired behaviour in this case. > > OK. > > > > > + led3 { > > > > + gpios = <&gpio0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > > + label = "LED3"; > > > > + }; > > > > > > I cannot find LED3. According to the schematics GP0_0 == CS0n is used > > > as the chipselect for the LVDS switch? > > > > My understanding is that CS0n is on GP1_20, could you please double > > check? > > (pin name: AJ4) GP0_00 == D0 == ExD0 on the schematic I have, I thought > > you may have been looking at an older version of the schematic, but after > > going through the history it seems like that line has always been there. > > Sorry, my mistake. As there is no GP0_0 in the schematic, I looked up > the pin number in the docs, but ended up using the R-Car M3-W SiP pin > number, instead of the RZ/G2M FCBGA SoC pin number :-( > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-19 8:16 ` Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-19 12:18 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-19 14:11 ` Fabrizio Castro 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Simon Horman @ 2019-06-19 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fabrizio Castro Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 08:16:43AM +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > Hello Geert, > > Thank you for your feedback > > > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > > Sent: 19 June 2019 08:34 > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > > > Hi Fabrizio, > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:56 PM Fabrizio Castro > > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > > From: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > Sent: 18 June 2019 16:10 > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:17 PM Fabrizio Castro > > > > <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > > > This patch adds LEDs support to the HiHope RZ/G2[MN] Main Board > > > > > common device tree. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@bp.renesas.com> > > > > > > > > Thanks for your patch! > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/hihope-common.dtsi > > > > > @@ -17,6 +17,30 @@ > > > > > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8"; > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > + leds { > > > > > + compatible = "gpio-leds"; > > > > > + > > > > > + led0 { > > > > > + gpios = <&gpio6 11 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > > > > > + label = "LED0"; > > > > > > > > There's no need for a label property, if it matches the node name > > > > (applies to all four LEDs). > > > > > > I could have used the actual names on the schematic, but then I realised that > > > would not have been too helpful due to the corresponding switch names: > > > LED0 - GP6_11 - SW2202 - LED2201 > > > LED1 - GP6_12 - SW2201 - LED2202 > > > LED2 - GP6_13 - SW2203 - LED2203 > > > LED3 - GP0_00 - N/A - LED2402 > > > The first 3 LEDs are found next to the micro USB connector for the debug console, > > > the forth LED is found next to the WiFi and BT LEDs. > > > > > > I thought that using "LEDn" as labels would put a remark on the > > > "desired ordering" of the LEDs (even though there is no actual > > > requirement for that), but as you pointed out it's probably a bit > > > confusing? Do you think I should take the label out? > > > > If the LEDs don't have nice labels on the PCB, I would drop the label > > properties. > > Will do. Simon, do you want me to send an incremental patch for this (this patch > is on devel branch already) or would you rather I sent a v2? Please send an incremental patch, thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support 2019-06-19 12:18 ` Simon Horman @ 2019-06-19 14:11 ` Fabrizio Castro 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Fabrizio Castro @ 2019-06-19 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Horman Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Geert Uytterhoeven, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Magnus Damm, Linux-Renesas, open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS, Chris Paterson, Biju Das, xu_shunji Hello Simon, > From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> > Sent: 19 June 2019 13:18 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support > > > > > Will do. Simon, do you want me to send an incremental patch for this (this patch > > is on devel branch already) or would you rather I sent a v2? > > Please send an incremental patch, thanks. Great, will send the patch in a minute. Thanks, Fab ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-19 14:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-06-14 13:14 [PATCH] arm64: dts: renesas: hihope-common: Add LEDs support Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-17 9:33 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-18 10:40 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-18 15:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-06-18 15:56 ` Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-19 7:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2019-06-19 8:16 ` Fabrizio Castro 2019-06-19 12:18 ` Simon Horman 2019-06-19 14:11 ` Fabrizio Castro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).