From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com"
<wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v6 5/5] mmc: queue: Use bigger segments if IOMMU can merge the segments
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 07:02:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB3590289F07A53A33296BC9D6D8EB0@OSBPR01MB3590.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617065331.GA5456@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
> From: Christoph Hellwig, Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 3:54 PM
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 06:46:33AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > can_merge seems a little too generic a name to me. Maybe can_iommu_merge?
> >
> > I'll fix the name. Also, only the device_iommu_mapped() condition wiil cause
> > a problem on iommu=pt [1]. So, I'll add another condition here.
>
> Instead of adding another condition here I think we need to properly
> abstract it out in the DMA layer. E.g. have a
Thank you for your comment and sample code! I'll add such functions
on next patch series.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> unsigned long dma_get_merge_boundary(struct device *dev)
> {
> const struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);
>
> if (!ops || !ops->get_merge_boundary)
> return 0; /* can't merge */
> return ops->get_merge_boundary(dev);
> }
>
> and then implement the method in dma-iommu.c.
>
> blk_queue_can_use_iommu_merging then comes:
>
> bool blk_queue_enable_iommu_merging(struct request_queue *q,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> unsigned long boundary = dma_get_merge_boundary(dev);
>
> if (!boundary)
> return false;
> blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, boundary);
> return true;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-13 10:20 [RFC PATCH v6 0/5] treewide: improve R-Car SDHI performance Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/5] iommu: add an exported function to get minimum page size for a domain Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-14 7:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17 5:08 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14 9:41 ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-17 5:23 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/5] block: sort headers on blk-setting.c Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/5] block: add a helper function to merge the segments by an IOMMU Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14 7:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 9:54 ` Robin Murphy
2019-06-17 6:29 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/5] mmc: tmio: Use dma_max_mapping_size() instead of a workaround Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17 4:25 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 20:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-14 7:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 7:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-17 4:54 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-17 6:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-06-17 6:54 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 10:20 ` [RFC PATCH v6 5/5] mmc: queue: Use bigger segments if IOMMU can merge the segments Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-13 19:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17 6:38 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-14 7:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-14 10:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2019-06-17 6:46 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2019-06-17 6:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-17 7:02 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda [this message]
2019-06-13 19:36 ` [RFC PATCH v6 0/5] treewide: improve R-Car SDHI performance Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OSBPR01MB3590289F07A53A33296BC9D6D8EB0@OSBPR01MB3590.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).