Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Add interrupt-names

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/4] dt-bindings: i2c: renesas,riic: Add interrupt-names
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 16:23:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRPdTiAakb6OBd2k@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1626267422.git.geert+renesas@glider.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]

Hi Geert,

> The Renesas RZ/A and RZ/G2L I2C Bus Interface has no less than 8
> interrupts.  So I think it makes sense to use "interrupt-names"
> property, to make it easier to review the interrupt mappings in DTS
> files.
> 
> Hence this series documents the "interrupt-names" property in the DT
> bindings, adds the property to the DTS files, and marks it required in
> the DT bindings. Obviously the last step cannot be applied until all
> earlier patches are upstream.
> 
> What do you think?

I like it and I'd think it is good to go. It is probably easiest if you
take the series via your tree to avoid merge conflicts and/or subsystem
dependencies. It's unlikely the YAML file will see further updates. So,
for the series:

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Let me know if you think another way is better.

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]