From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932AAC3F2D9 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2692086A for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Awop9XOq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727071AbgCBT6C (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:58:02 -0500 Received: from mail-yw1-f65.google.com ([209.85.161.65]:35134 "EHLO mail-yw1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725446AbgCBT5i (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:57:38 -0500 Received: by mail-yw1-f65.google.com with SMTP id a132so1051007ywb.2; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:57:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GKP1xnf+jUUC+vOfFhdMTbNrJBQ854KSrSLYHrZ06Bk=; b=Awop9XOq1i7oNr44YoGmA/aw95RSF8KIPQDXWo+1HSAkfVPLyZ/RyncObWJcPd4laq NzxXrvF8SPPpMcfZV8Luei62eAqaZpvxHJQk18hal4Omfa3ZTpgPybX2vqKC7X5hsQV/ sL71FkPxxFdS1utqODguNaCYJjniAdx39fLE73d0ZVIHjqbXQ96iIO+whXm/XoWqoHOC wkX09IwZ7qhUr0xP4hdn/Oxz87kY9U45HEcdRQCutvEzzdnPeiVieD1uaMiCwXSkRBPh 6aWgVRynhzIfrnW6fjyB+eHMv8yyCQ/wniKw7sNUSMagdPkHHZXnTkAs/rUavxHIt9VF layQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GKP1xnf+jUUC+vOfFhdMTbNrJBQ854KSrSLYHrZ06Bk=; b=MoR9ZDhWQVolFXAU9UNvzVF/E8XLDUvffN79Uk7twDwhYGPFMFxU5t1S4FK73WCQQJ tPEM3Q897cWR1SKSUNvXiRIGzBE4dNRpSrGF6VUI9nwVXwfGt+GoQKh5/X6WsX0jbdBn GTSxqmz0qx5ysa05UxTUxJQ7OKXxnaU8N0wUpyokVgz8ur73IJ36KGh6a/pkkOwG+raP bq6Vn5h6P4Jw59Joxx4Zb7ToUde1WUrarldX+37BL3S0eXPr/HWi3cZ5UgO1Aac0VAO5 8gu2N4a1/dz8re/WFB0SPKMhOPMAt6HZcPBeemKyhV29lVhhYC8zDUWckEAARr+dohEj mYeg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ16xMz92iT4pc6OANiqFwCfmeIYSDFmvx3W5+ZCC5LpvGDAIkH5 psvsZaNjCP9JySTCFN9vor0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvSk0t778qUzgJHbIXKFXgek6hyiUQEZELhI0jIaTTa8lYIW9yq45tXspn4bqz2gB7DHU9ozg== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:fc82:: with SMTP id m124mr1013400ywf.174.1583179055311; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.46] (c-73-88-245-53.hsd1.tn.comcast.net. [73.88.245.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h203sm8224852ywb.98.2020.03.02.11.57.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:57:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: of: Extract of_gpiochip_add_hog() To: Linus Walleij Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Rob Herring , Bartosz Golaszewski , Pantelis Antoniou , Mark Rutland , Peter Ujfalusi , Chris Brandt , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux-Renesas , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <20200220130149.26283-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20200220130149.26283-2-geert+renesas@glider.be> From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 13:57:34 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org On 2/28/20 4:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 6:18 PM Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 2/21/20 10:08 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >>> Patch applied with Frank's Review tag. >> >> I created a devicetree unittest to show the problem that Geert's patches >> fix. >> >> I would prefer to have my unittest patch series applied somewhere, >> immediately followed by Geert's patch series. This way, after >> applying my series, a test fail is reported, then after Geert's >> series is applied, the test fail becomes a test pass. >> >> Can you coordinate with Rob to accept both series either via >> your tree or Rob's tree? > > I see Rob already applied the test. > > I do not personally bother much about which order problems > get solved but I guess if Rob can back out the patch I can apply > it to my tree instead, before these patches. for some time, > before I start pulling stuff on top. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij > At this point, if it is a lot of trouble or confusion, I would not bother undoing the commits that have been done. I'll leave it up to you and Rob to coordinate if you do decide to undo. -Frank