linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com, juri.lelli@arm.com, anup@brainfault.org,
	palmer@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jeremy.linton@arm.com, Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mick@ics.forth.gr,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:28:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <35b92f83-dbbf-fad2-561f-49b0933ffe19@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181120152818.zd4Vz2mNt4nHbe95XyH0xaQo9zC7AKqGv9jeonbY3Ko@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181120111146.GA6497@e107155-lin>

On 11/20/2018 4:11 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:31:33AM -0700, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>
>> I was interested in testing these on QDF2400, an ARM64 platform, since this
>> series touches core ARM64 code and I'd hate to see a regression. However, I
>> can't figure out what baseline to use to apply these. Different patches
>> cause different conflicts of a variety of baselines I attempted.
>>
> 
> Good to know that we can test DT configuration on QDF2400. I always assumed
> it's ACPI only.

It is ACPI only in the production configuration.  I suppose we could 
hack things up to do basic DT sanity, but I expect it would be nasty and 
non-trivial.

> 
>> What are these intended to apply to?
>>
> 
> The series alone may not get the package/socket ids correct on QDF2400.
> I have not yet added support for the same as I wanted to get the initial
> feedback on DT bindings. The movement of DT binding and corresponding
> code should not regress and you should be able to validate only that
> part.
> 

On a cursory glance, it looks like some of the reorganized code would 
also be used in the ACPI path (things that are common between DT and 
ACPI).  I do not expect problems, but I still feel its prudent to do a 
sanity check on actual hardware.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-20 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-09  1:50 [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50 ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50 ` [RFC 1/3] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50   ` Atish Patra
2018-11-17 16:32   ` Rob Herring
2018-11-17 16:32     ` Rob Herring
2018-11-19 17:57     ` Atish Patra
2018-11-19 17:57       ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50 ` [RFC 2/3] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50   ` Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50 ` [RFC 3/3] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2018-11-09  1:50   ` Atish Patra
2018-11-15 18:31 ` [RFC 0/3] Unify CPU topology across ARM64 & RISC-V Jeffrey Hugo
2018-11-15 18:31   ` Jeffrey Hugo
2018-11-19 17:46   ` Atish Patra
2018-11-19 17:46     ` Atish Patra
2018-11-20 11:11   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-11-20 11:11     ` Sudeep Holla
2018-11-20 15:28     ` Jeffrey Hugo [this message]
2018-11-20 15:28       ` Jeffrey Hugo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=35b92f83-dbbf-fad2-561f-49b0933ffe19@codeaurora.org \
    --to=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).