From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1290C04EB9 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5646820672 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pJX0e/s/" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5646820672 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=a3DCE9FZCd3qm9JdrVfWm6SHM4GjCGimPAwIVXH5VU0=; b=pJX0e/s/U79no9 T6SovuomvA7U9wbaaKRHw3tDKShGa+6BK3OzmweswLMlZmpndr82O8g5fpMMshrZHp8Bae/3E79hK bjHlnaUtTu6vH8+ITiFk3StLMd0T2vxfP+ClUY3QkpRfkixdcg7HLJCAZD1MzkpIkpdYbm2d9MRSN 3CHUO7hlyeuMBdiTh4movwXY3uqaPeGEKnqC9criAfzulqqH7bnjGxQzHpHvm/jSIfM464z9GGc5O /IxcRUP5LGvRmekPJXALvv1Pz41TsoaIrB2nLSXIahPBtJ5XilcMxEiw+9am34p+BscgytElJB/Iq iQljU+Rf0Hfm4DcmxSQg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gTrNO-0004uL-Bg; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:47:18 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gTrNB-0004Wd-Bs; Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:47:06 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB7A1682; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 179773F59C; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 08:46:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:46:43 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Atish Patra Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 1/4] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Message-ID: <20181203164643.GA17883@e107155-lin> References: <1543534100-3654-1-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> <1543534100-3654-2-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1543534100-3654-2-git-send-email-atish.patra@wdc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181203_084705_423256_54A092C5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" , Catalin Marinas , Palmer Dabbelt , Will Deacon , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Morten Rasmussen , Juri Lelli , Dmitriy Cherkasov , Anup Patel , Ingo Molnar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , "moderated list:ARM64 PORT \(AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE\)" , Ard Biesheuvel , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Linton , Sudeep Holla Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:28:17PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote: > From: Sudeep Holla > > The current ARM DT topology description provides the operating system > with a topological view of the system that is based on leaf nodes > representing either cores or threads (in an SMT system) and a > hierarchical set of cluster nodes that creates a hierarchical topology > view of how those cores and threads are grouped. > > However this hierarchical representation of clusters does not allow to > describe what topology level actually represents the physical package or > the socket boundary, which is a key piece of information to be used by > an operating system to optimize resource allocation and scheduling. > > Lets add a new "socket" node type in the cpu-map node to describe the > same. > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla Thanks for picking this up and putting it as part of your unification work. I will try to test the series and review it soon. -- Regards, Sudeep _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv